|
Post by tonyg on May 1, 2017 20:43:20 GMT
We discussed this a lot in another places, but still what bothers me is why this relationship is so rejected or misunderstood by so many fans. So here I would discuss some reasons that I think could explain this. In short, in my opinion, many fans extrapolate over the relationship of Ani and Padme their vision of what a love relationship should be instead of try to understand what that relationship really is. Is not surprising, but the biggest problem for me is that they expect of it to be an example of contemporary relationship and Lucas made it romantic (not in the sense of dreamy but in the sense like it was in the past and in the this case, the classic love stories from the past). I should again say that I’m talking about their relationship before Anakin’s fall (there is love eve after that but so many things become so complicated that deserve another thread). So let see why I think that the fans expect modern or more precisely said, postmodern relationship. First, many times I heard and read that the Ani-Padme love is unhealthy which was a shock for me. Is not that the relationship should be pain and suffering or obsessive or something like that, not at all. The problem is why of all possible definitions to describe a relationship is chosen the opposition healthy-unhealthy. It could be happy-unhappy or strong-weak or whatever, yet something related to health is chosen? Why? what love has to do with health? It is some disease or something bad for people's life? The explanation for me is that in the postmodern world people try to deal with things from a point of view if these things are safe or not. If they are, the people can control them so everything is fine and the life is as it should be. So if they are safe, tamed, they are healthy i.e. good for the person. If not, they are unhealthy. But the love cannot be safe. The love is wild and uncontrolled (in a good sense of this word) is not tamed, is insecure, is not ordinary. The big love stories of the past are the opposite of that, so is the love of Anakin and Padme: against the odds, against many things, yet full of life and hope.
But in the same time is uncomfortable. I think this is the other name of the thing that many fans name as unhealthy. Is, the real love is uncomfortable because is unusual, strange feeling that cannot be closed in everyday’s life mood as is Padme-Ani love story. If this love story was quiet, ordinary ., i.e. usual, maybe I could be thought as healthy, i.e. good. But why should it be usual? Not every unusual thing is bad for the person yet today it is considered as untamed, unsafe, i.e. unhealthy. And last but not least, healthy is something generally (while not always) related first to the body and then to the soul. I’m afraid that the contemporary people think too much about their bodies and rarely about their souls, that’s why the health becomes even more important that it looks. Of course, it is important but today it becomes a real perspective to define the things that has little to do with it. There are another aspects in the same direction but I’ll talk about theme later.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on May 6, 2017 7:19:30 GMT
Great food for thought here, lots to chew on, contemplate and go over.
It's true that the love story of Padme & Anakin has been dismissed or written off by a sizable portion of the general audience, which I find unfortunate because it is richly embedded with wellsprings of depth and humanity - bounteously filled with beauty, humor, turbulence and tragedy. It is styled in the classic sensibilities, yet it's one of the most profound movie love stories of our time.
I always felt the misunderstanding was due to the audience's failure to just look deeper, but you helped me realize the other symptom, with your use of the word extrapolation; that they are looking at it through post-modern lenses & expectations, thus missing the bigger picture and misinterpreting the essential tonal expression, which also results in a failure to understand what is at work here.
By "unhealthy" I get the sense they are referring to psychological conditions such as codependency, obsessiveness, enabling, wanting a mommy figure, wanting a bad boy, someone to fix, etc. Perhaps audiences are too quick in putting modern psychoanalytical labels on the behaviors they see in the characters, and stopping there, without looking deeper into the innermost workings of the characters or the story of the galaxy, which are both symbiotically intertwined into one, another masterful touch.
Is that what you meant by the body? The mind/psyche kind of falls into an area between the body & the soul, but as far as love, the body/soul difference is between lust and a soul connection. Perhaps fans determine that they only lusted after each other - and only because Lucas knew they needed to fall in love. Which I see as a shortchanging of Lucas' intention in the scope of his marvelous work here.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on May 6, 2017 8:49:28 GMT
Audiences may have found the execution confusing or hard to read. It is layered in nuance and does require a reading between the lines. This style may not be for everybody, which is fine, but to turn around and call it bad, simply because it’s not to one’s taste is itself in... bad taste.
Perhaps the awkwardness & uncertainty reminded them of their own lives, hitting too close to home making them feel uncomfortable, which is not something they want to see on screen and experience with a movie. They want something larger than life; The Hollywood streamlined romance. But Padme & Anakin’s story is much larger than that, and also much more similar to real life. (And Lucas ain't Hollywood!)
It is larger, more real, yet also tastefully epic and fantastical.
Now I will extrapolate on your points; adding a prognosis that today’s people are afraid to allow themselves to be completely vulnerable and let love take them out of the ordinary. Padme & Anakin’s relationship is so raw. So insecure. So powerful. And as forbidden as it was destined. Yes, quite a bit out of today’s palates. But very admirable on Lucas' part and wondrously orchestrated. Subversive in the best way possible.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on May 6, 2017 18:48:53 GMT
I couldn't say it more precise! It is indeed! There are so many prejudices that the audience has (i.e. we know that because it reveals them in this rant against the love story) and maybe the stronger ones are described by you.
About the psychoanalytical labels as you called them, or more precisely said, the pseudo psychoanalytical labels: yes, the viewers do that to explain and moreover to 'tame' and symbolically put in control what cannot be tamed or put in control, i.e. the love. Is like they don't believe that such love can exist so they re-described it and explain it as deviation and all is safe and reasonable again , all is in order because this is just out of space, is unreal (all the opposite) or is not normal at all. In a very strict meaning of the word 'normal' the love of Ani and Padme is not normal as is not everyday thing, as it is larger than life as you said. Is unusual, extraordinary, strong. And for that it cannot be comfortable.
The so called fans whine how Padme and Anakin look awkward and say awkward and weird things. But of course, this is 'the normal' way to react in such situations. I would add more: they know that their love is forbidden and it is not that they don't care about it. Is not like in many contemporary movie romances (even Titanic is that way) where the protagonists actually don't care about the consequences of their actions and don't feel any guilt ('I feel good so I can do whatever I want', that is the principle). Is all the opposite with Ani and Padme: they know. That's why for them was so hard to confess their feeling to each other (for Anakin is less hard as he is more spontaneous and emotional but in the same time, less hard deosn't mean easier). Here comes the underrated aspect with their marriage. Many people just accept it as the usual culmination of the courtly love. Ii is not only that. The marriage is commitment to the death and even after that. So Anakin and Padme refuse to have 'an affair' (which is not strictly forbidden for the Jedi, although is not 'encouraged') they dedicate one to another completely. This ultimate dedication is superfluously explained as obsession by some 'fans'. What a pity that they obviously don't know the difference between both things.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jun 27, 2017 23:08:22 GMT
About soul and body: I meant something more literal here. Many fans describe the love story using very “material“ words that should be connected mostly to body (as is healthy) but love is not just that. But by materializing the description of love they feel.... secure and safe as love can be seen, touched and controlled.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Sept 9, 2017 12:57:18 GMT
Agreed. I feel the disconnect many anti-PTers experience comes from there being so much depth, dimension and intense emotionality in Episodes I-III that it may be too much for the parameters of the average movie-goer. The love story is but one example; others include such things as Jar Jar’s exuberant innocence and child-like wonder, that people mistake for annoying slap-stick without recognizing the tonal significance he holds for the trilogy. And also the unfortunate state of moral dilemmas the characters find themselves in that are mislabeled as “grey areas” or even just misunderstood as bad writing. Even the duels, though often widely praised for their choreography, still tend to be overlooked in regards to their rich emotional textures. The average movie-goer mostly just wants to be entertained for a couple hours; with modern method acting, some action & explosions, and sometimes a few people will also say, “Oh, and the main character had an interesting change of perspective at the end”. A superficial glance at these films is not enough, contemplation and discussion are needed to allow the inner beauty of this saga to blossom in the mind & soul. These films are not meant to be watched once or twice and quickly judged as “good” or “bad”. These are not like most other films. Trying to always transpose the sublime into the mundane is a disservice to the accomplishments Lucas achieved here. I mean, the OT is layered too, it’s just that the upper layers of that trilogy are perhaps more accessible (in a popcorn way?) in contrast to the more elusive nature of the PT. Which is perfectly appropriate, and that’s the thing. They form a beautiful yin-yang in many ways. Now, if I can take this conversation further, another term I feel gets thrown around too haphazardly when talking about the characters and the love story of Episodes I-III is “flaw” or “weakness". Do these have flaws or weaknesses? Well, sure in a manner of speaking, but to just slap that label on it and move on, thinking one has it figured out, is an oversight and a missed opportunity to revel in the layered explorations of human nature these films afford, imo. For starters, were Padmé and her love for Anakin flawed in that she "looked past his red flags" or because she didn’t run after hearing Anakin’s confession of the Tusken slaughter? Like I said in the Anakin thread, she was the only person in the galaxy who was willing (and immediately available) to support him in his crisis and to have faith in him to the end - because she’s a compassionate, strong person, and she saw the immense good in him that was worth nurturing. And her role moving forward was that of continued support in his ambition to be a Jedi and to do good in the galaxy. His decisions regarding the aftermath of the Tuskens and the death of his mother was his to make, alone. (I plan to get into this later). To say, “She just shrugged it off” is missing who Padmé is. There are two ways to look at Padmé's disposition regarding Anakin: her overlooking of his red flags is a weakness and a flaw. Or her love for Anakin was so strong and her faith & trust in him was so deep that they were perhaps too fervid. By that I mean it is exactly in her strength that she focuses on the good in the ones she loves and believes in. This is definitely an noble and understandable virtue, and everybody wants someone to have faith in them… and yet perhaps it is in her infinite faith in Ani to take responsibility for himself and make the right decisions, that an innocent blindspot dwelled. Her role was to be there to understand and support Anakin on a human level. It was not her responsibility to make him do what he had to do. She had the faith, and that’s what Anakin needed, but the question is, could he deliver? She 100+% believed he could. Now on the other side of the coin, one can say Anakin’s fatal weakness or flaw was that he was selfish and possessive of his loved ones. And/or that he didn’t want to face the change of losing them. And that is valid, even George says that in his interviews. But as with Padmé, I would just add by putting forth that this is relatively understandable, and I feel the term "over-extended strength" may apply more fittingly. His desire to love and to protect that love perhaps burned too intensely and personally for one sworn to protect the galaxy from evil. Anakin walked a precarious line in wanting both, and Sidious saw that as the way to maneuver him to his side. Now, I often shake my head when I hear people say “Palpatine exploited people’s weaknesses”. Hm, I would suggest a more appropriate description would be to say that he backs people into corners where they are forced to make decisions they normally wouldn’t make, but by playing to their strengths; getting them to over-extend themselves and open up a vulnerability - or provide him a stepping stone. For example, I recently saw a fellow PT-lover say Palpatine used Amidala’s “weakness” of her devotion to her people to dethrone Valorum. Weakness? Weakness, you say? Not weakness, a strength this is! And not only that, this particular strategy is what sets Palpatine apart from typical villains, he doesn’t exploit people’s weaknesses, he employs their strengths to set them down the path of his design, knowing their natural fortitude is what they will always default to when cornered. He maneuvers them into being complicit in their own downfall while using them as a means to his own gain. Back to Padmé & Ani. I mentioned the boundless faith that is innate within Padme’s strength. One of my favorite scenes in the saga is the balcony scene where she jokes that love has blinded him. This is a powerful moment, but unfortunately, again I feel people walk away from it with too shallow an interpretation. They think, “Oh, their mistake was that they overlooked each other’s flaws and were codependent. See it says it right there”. Not overlooking; Padmé knew Anakin better than anyone, possibly even himself— but in her absolute faith in him, she had what ended up being a misplaced certainty that the good in him would be the compass that would ultimately lead him to do the right things. It is the beauty of their love that makes them feel fulfilled and brings out each other's strengths. But yes, there is a mutual irony in her accusing him of being blinded by his love. And after all, there is a little truth in every joke. But was it just that Anakin’s love was blinding him? I'd say it’s that within that fire and passion they created together also burned the flame of over-attachment and emotions that clouded his judgement, and an unwillingness to let it go so that others could live. Anakin said it himself, that the Sith only think of themselves, Jedi think of others. Conversely, Padmé knew Anakin was rash and made mistakes, but I feel people put an inappropriately heavy a burden on her here. She knew Anakin was a good person, but she wasn't aware, nobody was aware, of the X-factor at play here: Paplatine was a Sith Lord and a master manipulator who was actively seeking to turn this powerful Force-weilder into his imperial enforcer. Who would? Did she suspect that inside Anakin could lay the an inclination to chose her life over others? Again, who would think to look for something like that? But I think through their strong bond this may be something that she was sensing during her ruminations. And of course later in “There’s still good in him.” To her, he’ll always be that heroic, noble boy from Tatooine. Through it all she saw him as ultimately solidly principled. Anakin made the wrong mistakes in the wrong circumstances. Mistakes he might not have made if he’d taken responsibility and faced up to what he did on Tatooine, and seek help for his issues which contributed to that. This scene is worth 10,000 words. I feel this shot epitomizes this quality I'm describing in Padmé. The steadfast, abiding faith. Was she sensing the turmoil in Anakin? Did she recognize the turbulent side of him, within the context of what has been on his mind lately? If so, she didn't falter in her assurance in him. "I can't help it." Though he struggled to be the Jedi he should be, within Anakin lie a smoldering sorrow and a fear of loss and thus a propensity to keep his world intact even if it meant sacrificing the rest. So, was it merely that their relationship was flawed? Again, one could make that assessment, but I would once again suggest that their near-sightedness is based in strengths that burned too bright for their own good, so to speak. Was Padmé's flaw that she had undying trust and hope in Anakin, and loved him in spite of all the danger? If so, it’s the flaw that saw the good in him which was passed on to Luke, which enacted Ani’s fulfillment of the prophesy and saved the Galaxy from the Sith Empire. Padmé was aware that having faith in Anakin could be a gamble, but she felt it was a gamble with good odds worth taking. Padmé lost. But thankfully, Luke later took the same gamble which led to a better outcome. And judging by the outcomes alone, one could say Padmé was wrong, or flawed, but can you really say that? Is she at fault? Wouldn’t Padmé & Luke be equally "flawed”? And again, is flaw really the right word? Is having faith in a good man and a protector a flaw? By his nature, Anakin was a protector and he wanted to be the best one possible. Anakin’s role is to stand up unshakably in the face of death from outside threats. But the fear of “what if” crept into his mind - what if an internal medical issue posed a threat? Something beyond his control. He was willing to do whatever it took to protect those who needed it, by any means necessary. However, it turned out, his instinct to protect Padmé ultimately dominated his desire to protect others and stop evil. Was it inevitable that he would always make that choice? He earlier expressed guilt over his dark pursuit, and he seemed to be weighing the decision while waiting in the Council room. Did he regret it afterwards? I believe that is largely what his tears signify. At the crux of this is that it was a choice. You can’t control change or death, you can only control are your choices. Was Anakin’s dream a vision of an inevitable outcome? Perhaps the message he was supposed to recognize was; You’re walking along a slippery slope; the Sith are after you, and if you continue on with fear of losing your attachments and emotions that cloud your judgment, you will be lured to the dark side. If you don’t focus your perspective, which determines one’s reality: change is constant, things aren’t fair but life can go on amidst loss. This is basically what Yoda tells Anakin. And I think it was Padmé's comment about love blinding him that served as a catalyst for the dream. The brightness of their love was a wonderful thing, but as a Force user it is crucial that Anakin know that that the glare was blinded him, along with the painful sorrow of losing his mother. But though he sought Yoda’s advice, he didn’t like it and without other avenues, he turned to dark sorcery for the answer. And in desperation and his refusal to let go of his intimate connection, he gave up on the values of self-sacrifice and hope. But this was not what Padmé would've wanted and it was the beginning of a path Padmé could not follow, and the rending of their souls broke her heart. And what is poignant, although tragic, about the final chapter of Anakin & Padmé is that it is centered around these three essential human aspects: Intimate connection, self-sacrifice and hope. To bury the pain of his mother’s death and the guilt of failing her, he exploded into rage. But by doing so he became that which he resented most as a protector; an agent of death. And eventually he became a killing machine, as his cybernetic arm symbolized the path he could head down. The cybernetic arm he received because his judgment was clouded over his inability to let go of Padmé. Which also clouded his judgment over what to do about his dream of Padmé dying. Anakin was convinced the Jedi held themselves back. Why not seek stronger powers? Yoda later says “Strong am I in the Force, but not that strong”. Anakin asks, why not, if it works? Anakin was too human to be stoic in the face of brutal personal loss. When faced with the possibility of losing Padmé, and without the aid he was looking for in the Jedi, he became too reliant on the quick & easy solution of forbidden dark knowledge, rather than love and hope, or the Jedi solutions of self-sacrifice and non-attachment. His weakness/over extended strength was that he desired to protect to such a degree that his loved ones became posessions that he did not want to lose. Combined with his way of twisting things to justify his desires. (i.e. look at what poor Anakin had to do to reconcile his nature with the Jedi code on love and attachment, by warping it to suit the way he is wired). His yearning for love was his strength as well as his Achilles heel. Bottom line, the point I’m trying to make here (and I feel Lucas was making) with Padme, Ani, the Jedi etc. was not that they had “stupid weaknesses", but that they were fervent in their values and virtues and strengths, but were missing part of the bigger picture. Most of all they are forced into making choices they normally wouldn’t by unknowingly employing their good intentions to pave the way for the Empire. Lucas stated plainly that Anakin’s undoing was that he "loveth too much.” And I would say the same goes for Padmé and the Jedi. To put it both simplistically and abstractly. TL;DR version: Anakin’s ultimately fatal flaws were that he didn’t take responsibility for his imbalances and was relatively easily seduced/manipulated. Padmé was there to support him. The only flaw I can see in her is that she had perhaps an over abundance of faith & trust in Anakin to actively do these right things and better himself, but nothing she would think to run from. Their love was strong and intensely bright, they had a solid bond, they couldn’t handle a ripping apart. When faced with making a split-second decision Anakin was willing to spare the Sith Lord to save his love at the cost of his soul - the Dark Side consumed him after his pledge. The brutal, tragic irony being that it is this decision that ripped them apart, the result of which he saw in his dream, which led him to his decision. Brilliant story crafting. Massively tragic, but brilliant. Padmé had faith in Anakin’s goodness and in his capacity to ultimately do the right thing - though when in a conundrum, within Anakin dwelled the desire to protect his world above the rest. His family over the Jedi way. Little did either of them know, Palpatine was a master manipulator with his sights set on Anakin. So my final verdict is that the layered nuances here show a deeper humanity than mere flaws or weaknesses; but rather strengths focused inward and strengths Palpatine took advantage of.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Sept 25, 2017 22:49:17 GMT
Amazing observations and much to discuss. First, I have to agree that Palpatine not only uses the others flaws in his advantage, he uses also their strengths making them look as weakness. Is what manipulators like him do in the real life. So the way he works his game is a little bit complicated not as simple as it looks (he uses Padme, i.e. he definitely uses her weaknesses. Is not that in this case).
But also I want to pay attention to another aspect of the misunderstanding of Padme-Ani love story and it is something I call the egoistic approach to love. What I mean is that in the nowadays world the relationships are 'appreciated' by the point view of pleasure (and nothing more): if he/she gives me pleasure and good time to spend I stay. If there are some difficulties, of any kind, I leave, whatever. Now, don't get me wrong again, the relationship shouldn't be pain and suffering, as I said earlier but neither should be egoistical feeling. To love is to give first and then to receive but it looks like today we have forgot this and we think about pleasure, safety, ego and so on but this is not love. Is not a coincidence that in the traditional marital vows of many cultures is said "in good and bad times”. Every relationship has the latter or sometimes the other person has it so in the traditional concept of love the beloved one should stay and try to help (if it is possible). In the egoistic approach it is unthinkable as these moments don't bring pleasure just difficulties and uncomfortable moments. But Padme is not follower of these views. She obviously knows what the real love is: to support, to help, to be there: in good and bad times. And in AOTC, in Tattoine Anakin is suffering a very bad time. Padme is ready to step back not when Anakin made a mistake or step out of the right way and want to come back but when she sees he rejected his own self, his own believes and even his love for power and greed. And even then she doesn't stop loving him, even then she tries to help him ( I mean the end of Episode 3). Now this is real love, like the old stories from the past. Because it has nothing to do with flowers, dinners and love songs. Now many would argue that these were not just bad times but red flags for something even worse. I disagree. The only red flag she received is then on Tattoine: when Anakin came back with the dead body of his mother who died in his arms after unstoppable torture of any kind that those people caused to her and he couldn't do nothing to prevent it. Is obvious that Padme would never approve Anakin's revenge (look at her initial reaction to Anakin's confession in the garage) but she cannot blame him for his rage and lost of control either. And the most important thing is that she is not there to judge him. First, is useless and stupid: he already showed so much remorse and guilt and he judged himself, so there is no need to do that. But second and most important: she didn't come to judge him, because this is not love. Love is help and support and not giving sentences from a higher point of view. I know many fans would prefer to see this but it doesn't fit in her character at all: Padme never judges the others she tries to understand them. And even more with Anakin who she loves more than her life. Of course, to understand that, some should forget the egoistical approach to love and remember what was the traditional one. Lucas insisted various times that this an old fashioned love story : is obvious why and I think many fans forget that fact.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Oct 26, 2018 19:33:51 GMT
I think Anakin realized to a degree what is happening to him. I feel lost, he said to Padme earlier in the movie and moreover he didn't only feel lost but he had lost himself later. To find himself wasn't possible using the Jedi ways they teach him. I understand why he didn't accept Yoda's advice. In that situation this was not a solution but just a cliche in his eyes. Is like if someone come to a teacher to look for a solution in a very particular case and the only solution he receives is theoretical abstract that serves for nothing in that situation. If Yoda even said: stay close to the person and try to protect her/him it would be enough. What Anakin needed was a little hope and he didn't receive any of it. He wouldn't be so desperate if Padme wasn't in danger because she was his life, his breathing air, the only hope he could have. And this hope was given to him by this special gift that Padme left him: his son.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Dec 22, 2019 18:56:31 GMT
Anakin and Padmé by Death Note illustrator, Takeshi Obata
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Dec 31, 2019 11:16:57 GMT
I'm not sure I like this picture. Is very well drawn however it doesn't depict Padme truthfully (I don't have in mind the physical appearance). Anakin here looks closer to his Vader persona and Padme looks too close to him as she needs his protection. Maybe is what Anakin sees in Ep.3. However, emotionally she is the pillar of balance in their relationship, yes being fragile as appearance and never being aggressive. Is another of the misunderstood elements of their relationship.
|
|
|
Post by eljedicolombiano on Jan 8, 2020 1:52:37 GMT
Hello old friends- EJC has arrived Great thread- I must add that it annoys me how fans can't see how Anakin and Padme where meant to be together, even if things did not end well. That is why the story is so sad and tragic, imo. Otherwise, the Luke-Padme connection in ROTJ looses a lot of weight imo. Putting reductionist metrics like "unhealthy" "dysfunctional" etc makes their love story one dimensional when it is anything but.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Jan 8, 2020 15:38:00 GMT
Hello old friends- EJC has arrived Bienvenido Jedi Colombiano!
Or, as a disguised lord of the Sith might say: "A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one"
I wholeheartedly agree with you on the relationship being neither "unhealthy" or "dysfunctional". Those terms, at least in a modern Western-context, tend to imply the man is the problem, and being abusive, but there's no evidence of this in either the films or the animation, until the scene on Mustafar at the end of Revenge of the Sith. To be sure, Anakin, is a risky romantic partner that Padmé chooses in Attack of the Clones, but nobody other than the viewers - who have the advantage of watching the story as a "prequel" - can foresee what will eventually happen. Yes, Lucas is correct in saying, during the commentary track for the wedding scene, that she "married the wrong guy", but ultimately that is a luxury called hindsight that neither she nor any other of our heroes in the trilogy can afford.
As Cryogenic has eloquently said in the past, love isn't always the logical process that we ascribe it as - that we believe it to be. It can often run counter to common sense, behave it extraordinary difficult manners to pin down, and sometimes match two of the most unlikely partners together. To me, the pair are inextricable - it's as if the Force brought them together. If it had to be the son as the one to redeem the father, then this is surely the case. As Anakin saids in what is my favourite scene between Natalie and Hayden, their baby is "a blessing" - and quite right he was, in the long term. At the same time, the couple don't exist as placeholders to usher in their children either: their offspring are a product of their love.
Could Anakin have become a Sith Lord without having fallen in love with Padmé? That is, the two stick to the agreement made during the fireplace scene of parting ways. It's an interesting hypothetical. My answer would be possibly yes, but it would require a whole new turning strategy from Palpatine. What's important to bear in mind here though is that Padmé isn't the cause of Anakin's fall - had Palpatine not been around, things might have worked out very well for the couple. We can argue until the cows come home about the responsibility for his turn to the Dark Side, but what is evidently clear is that were it not for Palpatine's scheming, their relationship would not have blown up so spectacularly.
So that prompts the question: did the Force dictate that the marriage had to run into disaster? Well, I for one refuse to believe this. I think the Force is powerful and capable of a few extraordinary interventions (Anakin's birth), but I don't think it can command the direction of human relationships. That would make The Force a rather evil entity, wouldn't it? Not to get even more theological here, but it seems that evil exists in the galaxy of Star Wars, and it's not so simply for even the greatest good to suddenly vanquish it all. It is a persistent thread, and the best we can do is to be mindful of it and to understand what leads ordinary people into its clutches. Yoda in the PT, though a flawed individual like any other Jedi master, presents a lot of wisdom in this regard.
Lastly, it's important that we remember that relationships portrayed in fiction, especially in these fantasy epics, are supposed to be dramatic. What does that mean? It means that a husband and wife cannot be found in an idealised world where everyone behaves perfectly - there has to be big problems, and that includes their own relationship. Anakin and Padmé are no different, and to suggest that their conversations should not be fraught with the worries, concerns and even disagreements of a couple caught up in a war that is ravaging all before them, is just plain codswallop.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jan 11, 2020 10:21:08 GMT
In another forum one commentator said that Ani/Padme is not "perfect" romance but a tragic one. It struck me how Hollywood somehow made the people expect that the "good" love stories should end as in romantic comedy while in the classic literature there are examples of both and nobody judges the love story for its end but for what it was. Here the tragic end is interconnected with the world's fate so the world fade and both Ani and Padme died while Anakin only symbolically. But it doesn't mean that if the love never happened the world would survive: it was about to fell in one or another (that's why I said inter-connected). So we can speculate what would happen to Anakin if he had never married to Padme but it is clear that the fate of the world was doomed: the Clone wars would happen and the Empire would rise anyway. So the real question is what would happen with their love if the Empire had never risen. I think they would have a chance. And bienvenido El Jedi Colombiano!
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on Jan 11, 2020 19:48:02 GMT
To me, the only thing even appearing “unhealthy” while they were married was something beyond their control, and that is the Jedi Order’s rule about attachments. It is also indicated in the films that Padme is inherently driven to focus on her career, and that this is expected of her
In ROTS, she expresses fear that the Queen will recall her from her duties if the pregnancy gets out. While her political subplot was largely omitted from ROTS, I feel as though that line demonstrates that despite her love for Anakin, Padme is just as devoted to her work as ever (a side of her not seen much in ROTS compared to its predecessors.
I’ve thought about it, and I don’t think that Anakin was so terrible in AOTC either, except maybe the camera joke. The line “Sorry milady” seemed off to me too, but really, Anakin isn’t at all experienced in this field. Neither is Padme.
The only time it does become unhealthy is after he turns to the dark side, which is where the tragedy of the romance unfolds. Otherwise, they were just like a loving husband and wife. Most husbands would do a lot to try and stop their wives from dying, but Anakin took it too far after he turned to the dark side and attacked the Temple.
And I do remember the Clovis arc of TCW’s sixth season.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jan 19, 2020 20:31:12 GMT
Another aspect that is often ignored is that this relationship is developed on screen. Some could argue that is rushed and inexplicable but I don't think so, There is something that some of the viewers maybe ignore in the movies but the prequels are presented mostly by Anakin's point of view. And that happens especially with his connection to Padme, even in Ep.1. For Anakin looks like"suddenly" in the arena tunnel Padme confesses her love to him while for the viewer should be clear that the old childish bond that existed is becoming deep love. For me, the kiss scene, Padme's desire to share personal moments with Anakin, to share thoughts with him are the symptoms of all this. But the crucial scenes are the meadow picnic and the fireplace conversation. It is true that Padme herself is avoiding to confess her feelings to herself (the hardest part, I would say) but for me it was all clear when she had chosen to go with him to Tattoine, ignoring the danger for herself just to be around him in this hard moment. So, no matter that those scenes that revealed more clearly her feelings (the deleted scenes on Naboo that are great, actually) are not included in the movie, it was clear what is going on. Padme and Anakin live in very sophisticated, Victorian type of society where some matters shouldn't be discussed directly (that is way Anakin is like a fresh air with his straight to the point attitude). So everything is much more subtle that in our times but still when it comes to the confession of feelings it is direct but in a way painful. However, we see all this process on screen: neither of this happens in OT, not to mention ST. In OT TESB began with some kind of flirting banter game between Leia and Han that should be developed between the two movies and we should just believe that Leia should developed some attachment to Hand and maybe Han to her. So I don’t understand the complain of everything being rushed in AOTC.
|
|
|
Post by Somny on Apr 8, 2020 22:46:58 GMT
Sorry to butt into this topic but this seemed most appropriate here: In the veranda scene in ROTS where Padme openly yearns for a simpler time with Anakin on Naboo "when there was nothing but [their] love," the following dialogue suggests something peculiar about this moment of felt nostalgia for the seemingly idyllic. As the two embrace following that line, Padme says there was "no politics, no plotting, no war" back then on Naboo. But that's not quite true under close examination. - First, there was politics. Their little meadow-side chat was rife with ideas and particularly dark rumblings of a political nature.
- Second, there was plotting. Anakin faked being injured from a daring ride on a shaak in addition to certain conversational tacks to provocate Padme's affection.
- Lastly, there was war. Padme and Anakin had a serious feud over the prospect of a love affair which reached deeply into their identities as Senator and Jedi, respectively. Anakin came away particularly damaged.
Anyway, this occurred to me a few years ago but I had nowhere to air it. Anyway, what's that they say? "Love is a battlefield"? I think Lucas would agree.
EDIT: Now that I think about it a bit more, I realize Padme may have been referring to their Naboo stay when the two got married. In any case, the possibility of Padme referring to the earlier lakeside retreat was too delicious to pass up.
EDIT (2): Still, the politics, plotting and war line calls back rather directly to the very essence of those earlier events. There are so many other ways that could have been written if that was not the intent.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on May 24, 2020 22:11:13 GMT
Sorry to butt into this topic but this seemed most appropriate here: In the veranda scene in ROTS where Padme openly yearns for a simpler time with Anakin on Naboo "when there was nothing but [their] love," the following dialogue suggests something peculiar about this moment of felt nostalgia for the seemingly idyllic. As the two embrace following that line, Padme says there was "no politics, no plotting, no war" back then on Naboo. But that's not quite true under close examination. - First, there was politics. Their little meadow-side chat was rife with ideas and particularly dark rumblings of a political nature.
- Second, there was plotting. Anakin faked being injured from a daring ride on a shaak in addition to certain conversational tacks to provocate Padme's affection.
- Lastly, there was war. Padme and Anakin had a serious feud over the prospect of a love affair which reached deeply into their identities as Senator and Jedi, respectively. Anakin came away particularly damaged.
Anyway, this occurred to me a few years ago but I had nowhere to air it. Anyway, what's that they say? "Love is a battlefield"? I think Lucas would agree.
EDIT: Now that I think about it a bit more, I realize Padme may have been referring to their Naboo stay when the two got married. In any case, the possibility of Padme referring to the earlier lakeside retreat was too delicious to pass up.
EDIT (2): Still, the politics, plotting and war line calls back rather directly to the very essence of those earlier events. There are so many other ways that could have been written if that was not the intent.
Padme talked about the moment of their honey moon, if I can call it that way but maybe it was a week when they secretly married and stayed on the lake country. From what she said in ROTS is obvious that in the mentioned moment they already had confessed their love to each other (hold me like you did on th lake of Naboo she said, he never did that in AOTC for obvious reasons) . There was no war at this scale at this moment: Yoda forsaw it but even the other Jedi on the room on the final scene of AOTC looked how to say it , unpleasantly suprised when he said that. So the Clone war is not at full speed then, is only a battle of Geonosis.
But anyway, this is not the intention behind Padme's words. What she meant is obivous: they could stay by their own alone on this idylic country, it was only them and their love. In Coruscant is not that way. There politics always tries to stand between them even for the simple reason that they could find less and less time to spend together (but having in mind their previous conversation this is the smallest of all problems). Padme wishes that for a moment they just could pretend to escape from all the present problems in the world and stay toghether as in their happier times.
|
|
|
Post by Somny on May 24, 2020 22:18:49 GMT
A bridge too far. Thanks for your correction and clarification.
|
|
|
Post by Moonshield on May 25, 2020 4:04:42 GMT
Sorry to butt into this topic but this seemed most appropriate here: - Lastly, there was war. Padme and Anakin had a serious feud over the prospect of a love affair which reached deeply into their identities as Senator and Jedi, respectively. Anakin came away particularly damaged.
Anyway, this occurred to me a few years ago but I had nowhere to air it. Anyway, what's that they say? "Love is a battlefield"? I think Lucas would agree.
EDIT: Now that I think about it a bit more, I realize Padme may have been referring to their Naboo stay when the two got married. In any case, the possibility of Padme referring to the earlier lakeside retreat was too delicious to pass up.
EDIT (2): Still, the politics, plotting and war line calls back rather directly to the very essence of those earlier events. There are so many other ways that could have been written if that was not the intent.
It's obvious that she doesn't say about the meadows scene from AOTC, because at that moment even Anakin hadn't still declared of his love.
Even during the clone wars, soldiers (Anakin) or politicians (Padme) can have a vacation. I think, they could have a vacation (a week), they went to Naboo for relax.
|
|
|
Post by Moonshield on May 25, 2020 4:11:42 GMT
For me, the most important, but ignored aspect of their relationship, is Anakin's refusal to save Obi-Wan. At this moment, his light side wins (he makes a right decision) and only after that Padme can say "yes" to him. In simple terms, at that moment he is a Jedi and can "let go", though Obi-Wan is the closest person for him.
|
|