|
Post by truestarwarsnerd01 on Dec 26, 2019 18:35:31 GMT
George Lucas would have brought back Palpatine. He did it in the Dark Empire comic. Frankly, any other villain would make it separate from the first 6 movies. An Anakin Force-ghost would have been silly. I was always afraid of that rumor. His grandson helped Rey defeat Palpatine, and imitated his sacrifice, so I don't see how this ending dishonored him. Not sure what's so unbelievable about Palpatine having children. You can say that these criticisms are different from prequel-bashing, but it really always comes down to pointing out what fans call its strengths and calling them flaws. If I had to complain about anything, I'd say Maz Kenada strikes me as a Disnified filler character, and I'm glad she doesn't get too much screen time. But I'm sure some people like her. As for whether or not she looks like a foreskin, that's uh... subjective, I guess.
There is so much nonsense here, let's try to dissect it, shall we?
"would have brought back Palpatine"
This is so typical of the conjecture of Sequel Trilogy fans wherein what we get magically coincides with Lucas's vision. "Still have", "would have" yada yada yada - it's all a load of wishful thinking. We have no concrete proof that Palpatine would have come back, he was simply dead when Ian McDiarmid inquired. Do you know what we do have proof of though? Lucas disliking the direction of TFA.
"He did it in the Dark Empire comic"
Lucas is on record numerous times about the old Expanded Universe being a parallel mythology. Was there some good stuff there? Of course, but let's please not pretend he had any significant role in designing or shaping it. From what I've heard, he barely read any of it.
"Frankly, any other villain would make it separate from the first 6 movies."
Ah, I see you're still falling for the phony "Skywalker Saga" marketeering. This was little more than a convenient afterthought to con fans into seeing another sequel, after the previous one had been so despised. It's quite clear when one watches TFA that there was no intention to try something new that might honour both the OT and the PT. It feels disjointed from Episodes I-VI (the tragedy of Anakin Skywalker) straight from the beginning, and TROS is a desperate, half-heartened, ham-fisted sham of an attempt to do so at the last minute.
You know, the correct thing the do would have been to do just that: a separate trilogy. What is their to be afraid of? All the ingredients were in place: a mysterious Dark-Side villain in Snoke, a trio of young heroes and new droids. But no, that wasn't enough because the overlords at Disney wanted to spit all over the legacy of Anakin Skywalker by fooling us that he was of any relevance to their pitiful trilogy and bringing back the man he definitely killed.
"An Anakin Force-ghost would have been silly"
Oh my word, are you serious? You want a unified 9 film saga, and yet you also want to take a dump on the main character for the first 6 films? Do you have any understanding what the arc of Episodes I-VI even is? Let me show you what the guy who created Star Wars has to say. It follows from logic then that if you want to expand the story, Anakin still has to have a presence in the new films. And how does that happen if he's deceased? A force ghost assisting a troubled member of the new generation, that's how. Anakin would have quite a few words of wisdom from his famous life story, don't you think?
By pandering to OT fanboys with the constant teasing of the Darth Vader mask in all 3 sequel films, and not even referencing "Anakin" as much as ONCE, not to mind a Force Ghost or retelling his victory, the filmmakers are inherently playing down the redemption of Anakin Skywalker. There are no two ways about it when the characters keep talking about Darth Vader, while refusing to remind us how and why he died. The filmmakers do not understand the arc of Anakin Skywalker, and it's tragic.
"imitated his sacrifice"
Ben Solo doesn't strike the killing blow on Palpatine in TROS; Anakin does in ROTJ. That is a significant difference. Legally-speaking one includes a homicide, the other does not. Again, listen to how Lucas defines the fulfilment of the prophecy: "[he] does destroy the Sith - meaning himself and the Emperor." Besides, the "saving" in TROS is in itself very different to the one in ROTJ, as it occurs via a brand new Force power. It is a power that creates a plot hole in the prequels, as I detailed earlier.
"Not sure what's so unbelievable about Palpatine having children"
Many fans believe he was implied as asexual. So not only it is a retcon of the ancestry given for Rey in TLJ, but it is also a retcon of Palpatine's characterisation in the prequel trilogy. I don't feel too strongly on this one, but I do think it comes about through an act of desperation on the screenwriters to justify their preposterous idea of reviving Palpatine. And so why is the Sith Lord back? Because of an unplanned, uncoordinated, careless, make-it-up-as-you-go-along attitude to making Star Wars - that's how. When you've got a producer like Kennedy who doesn't care for Star Wars, you're handicapped from the beginning.
And Maz Kenada is what you gripe about? That is a petty complaint. Do yourself a favour, and look closely at what I've shown to be real problems with this trilogy.
To be fair, there was an idea in Lucas’s scrapped Underworld series where Palpatine would’ve fallen in love with someone but had his heart broken by her after some time. Maybe making Rey a Palpatine would’ve been born out of ideas for that show, but, I don’t think it’s coincidental and felt they did it for no reason whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 26, 2019 18:44:18 GMT
For the record, I am a Trump-supporting Republican, and misogynist, and I loved TLJ.
|
|
M-I-D-1E
Representative
I am...
Posts: 12
|
Post by M-I-D-1E on Dec 26, 2019 18:55:59 GMT
I agree with Pyro. Unless you’ve gathered sufficient visual and linguistic data, commentary about the movie as if you’ve seen is a bit disingenuous. If you're arguing that we didn't gather sufficient data, why don't you expose us by telling which data we've gather is wrong or lacking? Not doing so and accusing us of being disingenuous is disingenuous. All the criticisms made so far are based on content from the movie, not erroneous information, not incomplete information. It's there. Watching the movie will only corroborate what's being criticized. Everyone here is invited to address those criticisms if they disagree with them. But to dismiss them and make ad hominem attacks (while giving us a lecture about how we are being like PT haters) is not only unnecessary, but very hypocritical. For the record, I think we need a thread to discuss the positives of the film. This is a discussion thread about the movie, that includes positives and negatives. But sadly I don't see any discussion about the movie, but a discussion about people who have criticisms against the movie while being accused of whining, ignorance and disingenuousness (and the occasional Pasquali spam posts, but those are easily ignored). If we are that ignorant and disingenuous, then addressing the criticisms we've made should be easy. But I guess ad hominem attacks are even easier. It seems that lately, prequel fans are being exploited by their dislike of Disney by ST fans. And SW fans, never changing in their character, bash the ones involved in the creation of the ST. That includes the actors, who don’t really have much in the way of multiple choice. They are stuck on a binary plane. Which prequel fans have criticized the actors? Not that there's anything wrong with criticizing actors on their performance, but from what I've seen, that's the least of most people's problems with these movies. Let me be clear; I was not referring to you personally or even everyone here. I did say that watching the movie than getting your own opinion should be bare minimum for criticizing the film and as for overtly discussing the negatives of the ST, we tend to become a bit bitter by staying in that mode constantly. And critique or criticisms of any kind is fine in practice. And no, we haven’t really looked at their performances negatively very much. It’s not a problem for me, just everything else lmao.,
|
|
|
Post by truestarwarsnerd01 on Dec 26, 2019 21:32:10 GMT
For the record, I am a Trump-supporting Republican, and misogynist, and I loved TLJ. Not everyone would agree with you, though.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Dec 26, 2019 23:11:39 GMT
Trump supporting Republicans huh...
|
|
|
Post by truestarwarsnerd01 on Dec 26, 2019 23:24:38 GMT
Trump supporting Republicans huh... I’m sorry if I offend you, if you are that. But, the way I’ve seen SW fandom say stuff like “SJW”, “NPC” or “Get Woke, Go Broke” support my point.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 0:25:30 GMT
I don't think TLJ implies that all rich people are evil, or that all men need a verbal spanking from women with purple hair. Inclusivity is not new or bad for Star Wars. I think the backlash against the movie was a lot of hype that made conservatives look petty.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Dec 27, 2019 4:17:16 GMT
In response to the thread: Adherence to/honoring the PT: Nope, JJ threw them a bone at best. Not surprised, but disappointed. The opportunity to bring back Anakin, as was said on this page, was right there. Anakin Skywalker: The voice was the bone thrown to the PT. But it means much less considering it was jumbled with many others (as nice as it was to hear Mace and Qui-Gon). He is the central character of Lucas’s Star Wars, and Disney has intentionally marketed this trilogy as part of the Skywalker saga. They clearly didn’t want to deprive Rey of a heroic moment, but I can think of several ways they could have kept Rey’s role while giving Anakin a heroic return. You know what would make such an event more meaningful in my opinion? Making Rey a birth Skywalker. Writing/Dialogue/Humor: About standard. A mix of laugh and eye roll inducing lines. Music: Probably my favorite aspect of the film. I enjoyed the return of old themes as well as the theme on Exogol. Sound design: Decent enough Art direction: Pretty good actually Visual effects: Wasn’t impressed with Palpatine, but the scenes looked good. Particularly the lair, the planets during the lightspeed hopping scene, and Lando’s fleet. Palpatine’s survival: Not at all adequately explained. I can think of several ways that, if they insisted on bringing him back, they could have explained it. Maybe he’s a ghost instead of a clone looking to be resurrected. I honestly expected his return immediately after seeing TLJ, given that I knew Kylo wasn’t going to work as the next film’s primary antagonist. Palpatine’s characterization: Not deep, which was expected. The loyalist cult wasn’t explained and was underused in my opinion. Snoke: A little disappointing, but the blow was softened by the fact that I had stopped caring about his origin. I guess it would make sense if Palpatine was behind the First Order all along. Makes Snoke seem more like a throwaway villain in the same camp as Zam Wesell and General Grievous (inferior to both). Leia: Footage was mostly convincing except for one scene. I noticed that her silhouette was shown in the scene where she is dying. I will admit that that scene was sad in a way, but annoying considering who she was using her life energy for. Trio adventures: Fun action, but it was harder to care about the principals. Rey being a Palpatine is not the least of the factors, while it felt like they were trying to mimic the Han-Luke-Leia love triangle in ROTJ. The small conflicts between Rey, Finn and Poe ended up going nowhere, and their group dynamic felt wasted. Just filler, mostly. They didn’t seem to matter once Ben Swolo came “back” (we never saw any side of Kylo before except an evil, manipulative one) Rey’s ancestry: Worst thing about the film besides the Reylo kiss. Makes it clear that the term Skywalker saga is no more than a gimmick. Rey adopting the last name means nothing. Just shows that Anakin and Luke were just placeholders. Luke doesn’t have one legacy to be proud of. Lightsaber battles: The Endor duel was admittedly pretty cool, but again, it was hard to care about the principals involved. Anything good about it was ruined when Rey got sappy for Kylo. Why would she feel any more guilt about fatally wounding him than any other villain. That side of him is the only one she ever knew! She never knew Ben Solo as a better person and yet she cries over him and kisses him the minute she sees him for the first time. Space battle: Cool scene, but the reinforcements were meant to imitate the Ewoks. The problem is, we never saw how Lando was able to contact so many people, just that Poe and company were supposed to have faith that they would come. Conversely, the surprise element of the Ewok attack was removed, since we kept hearing about how the reinforcements would come. Han as a Force ghost: I don’t mind Han appearing in theory, and I will admit it served the story. But my personal bias against Kylo makes it hard to appreciate that scene. Han said the same thing in TFA and Kylo looked him cold in the eye before stabbing him. Luke: Nothing unexpected. Efforts to salvage the character after the damage done in TLJ would probably have strayed the narrative. I can think of ways to do this, but they are cheap. The finale: visually impressive, but I felt as though Anakin should have a role in ultimately defeating the villain who we were supposed to think he killed already, which was the climax of all of Lucas’s Star Wars. Kylo got too happy of an ending, and while a happy-ish ending for Rey was expected, it didn’t feel earned. Palpatine’s death went the way I expected. The kiss: Unearned, and ruins any good to Rey’s character. She becomes the love-pet of a man she only met now after only being exposed to his evil alter-ego who may have pretended to show her a better side. Worse, she was all feely for him before this other side was given any hint, and after at the start of TROS, Kylo went back to the same evil BS he had always pulled. About her dismissal of Finn, it was disheartening, but it goes to show what an inconsistent character Rey is. Not because Finn is entitled to her love, but because Kylo deserves it the least of almost anyone she’s crossed paths with. I’m not such a fan of Padme’s story in ROTS, but it’s one flaw in an otherwise great film. There were too many in the ST to overlook. That said, Padme’s sappiness for Anakin even after he turned evil makes far more sense than Rey’s bizarre feelings for Kylo. At least there was a precedent of Padme seeing that Anakin had been a good person. At least she had known and loved the good Anakin before he fell. Rey never knew whatever “Ben Solo” we were supposed to believe existed. Ending: Rey doesn’t deserve to be an honorary Skywalker, not after she threw away the legacy for Kylo.
Great post!
I disagree with you on Padmé's handling in ROTS, but then I'm kind of similar on Anakin's dialogue in AOTC, so I guess we all have our minor quibbles.
Your analysis of the TROS's kiss is spot-on. As prequel fans, I think we're obligated to fight back against the poor interpretations of Anakin and Padmé's romance, which was genuine and only turned into shambles, tragically, at the very end of the latter's life on Mustafar. What we see in ST is equivalent to Padmé meeting Vader in Episode IV and then kissing him in VI just before his death - something so abominable, and so undeserved, that one has to wonder what ever was going on in Abrams mind when he wrote it. Given that the protagonist in this trilogy is female simply to push a female empowerment narrative (all very fine, by the way), it's baffling - it's so hard to believe - that they would self-sabotage, and tear down all that hard work, by making her the rewarder of a serial abuser and mass murderer. I mean, hello, aren't we supposed to be living in an era of #MeToo?
Rey, unlike Padmé, has absolutely no reason to believe Kylo Ren is anything other than the leader (or accessory) of a fascist regime, however conflicted he may be. When Anakin falls in love in AOTC, he may have a temper problem, but his fall is still far from a foregone conclusion (in real-time). So while not an ideal choice of spouse for Padmé, it is still a believable love story in that it echoes what sometimes, regrettably, happens in real life - the man appears all sweet an wonderful at the start, before later becoming a monster. For more on this, I'd recommend reading Becca Benjamin's interpretation of the relationship - a keen SW fan who is also the victim of domestic abuse.
I wholeheartedly agree on Rey's ancestry. If only she'd been Luke or indeed Leia's daughter from the start, it would have saved us all so much bother. It would stand as a healthy compromise between the poles of "Nobody" and "Worst place". There should have been cousin Skywalkers in this trilogy.
Palpatine's involvement should have been hinted at from the beginning (in TFA), if he was the make the slightest bit of sense. It's such an enormous waste, what trouble the filmmakers went to sell us Snoke as the new Dark Side power, only to abandon him so selfishly. I'd never fallen in love with him in the way I had with all the Sith Lords, but after seeing him - or rather, even more belittlingly: many Snokes - in the cloner tubes in TROS I'm now left feeling a great deal of pity for him. I kid you not! They've reduced him to a glorified puppet, which is such a ridiculous transformation from the massive, frightening projection we witnessed before Kylo in TFA. So you could argue that Abrams has flipped the tables on the ST story in much the same way Palpatine did to the galaxy in ROTS - both are devastating, yet it's only the latter that feels earned.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 6:31:31 GMT
When Rey slices the wing of Kylo's tie fighter and he goes tumbling, I almostt yelled "Poodoo!" in the theater.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on Dec 27, 2019 7:18:23 GMT
Archduke, your analogy of Padme meeting Vader in ANH is spot-on.
And having Rey and Kylo be related would give her a marginal reason to care about his redemption, rather than none at all.
To the credit of the Anakin/Padme romance, Padme absolutely has reason to care about Anakin. Even if he killed younglings, that doesn’t necessarily cancel out the love she’s formed for him, nor does it mean she automatically writes him off. Been more wary of him, yes, and maybe someone other than Padme would have approached the situation very differently. It’s just who Padme is and how she interprets her dynamic with Anakin.
I should add that the only issue I really have with this plot development is Padme’s death being of a broken heart. It doesn’t feel right to me, but I respect it as part of Lucas’s story. As I said, it’s one flaw to me among so many things to like about ROTS.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Dec 27, 2019 9:42:33 GMT
This is so sad. Stampid and Trunerd who are too concentrated in offending the others somehow fail to see that since they registered here, personal offenses become frequent in this forum. It was something we tried to avoid and maybe is useless to mention what is said in the general rules as they obviously didn't bother to read it. I didn't change my mind not to participate here and I won't but as it was explained that I'm not part of the bad guys and I shouldn't be offended, I have to reply. Well, is actually worse. Because some of you dare to define who is worthy to speak about the movies and who is not and also based on their attitude to the movie. This is not discussion, this is a First Order reunion and obviously someone thinks he is the Supreme leader and can consider his beliefs as the only ones worthy to be exposed... Sorry, as I said this is not discussion. Discussion is if you discuss the movie and not the other participants. As already this is not the main motif here (sorry Archduke) I won't participate.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Dec 27, 2019 11:35:05 GMT
This is so sad. Stampid and Trunerd who are too concentrated in offending the others somehow fail to see that since they registered here, personal offenses become frequent in this forum. It was something we tried to avoid and maybe is useless to mention what is said in the general rules as they obviously didn't bother to read it. I didn't change my mind not to participate here and I won't but as it was explained that I'm not part of the bad guys and I shouldn't be offended, I have to reply. Well, is actually worse. Because some of you dare to define who is worthy to speak about the movies and who is not and also based on their attitude to the movie. This is not discussion, this is a First Order reunion and obviously someone thinks he is the Supreme leader and can consider his beliefs as the only ones worthy to be exposed... Sorry, as I said this is not discussion. Discussion is if you discuss the movie and not the other participants. As already this is not the main motif here (sorry Archduke) I won't participate. My personal apologies for my part in the derailing of this thread... won’t happen again. I should have known better. Hope you will stay!
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 15:01:54 GMT
This is so sad. Stampid and Trunerd who are too concentrated in offending the others somehow fail to see that since they registered here, personal offenses become frequent in this forum. It was something we tried to avoid and maybe is useless to mention what is said in the general rules as they obviously didn't bother to read it. I didn't change my mind not to participate here and I won't but as it was explained that I'm not part of the bad guys and I shouldn't be offended, I have to reply. Well, is actually worse. Because some of you dare to define who is worthy to speak about the movies and who is not and also based on their attitude to the movie. This is not discussion, this is a First Order reunion and obviously someone thinks he is the Supreme leader and can consider his beliefs as the only ones worthy to be exposed... Sorry, as I said this is not discussion. Discussion is if you discuss the movie and not the other participants. As already this is not the main motif here (sorry Archduke) I won't participate. I've said more about the movie than anyone in this thread. Most criticism of this film is a distraction from discussion of the film itself and I can't take responsibility for it. There are plenty of other places to discuss whether or not the prequels were fairly judged or if Lucas should have had more creative control over the franchise, after he sold it, over six years ago. Those are old and dead topics which have nothing to do with the movie itself, especially if those discussing it have not even seen the movie in question. Now go ahead and call me a troll, for defending this film, which this thread is named for, from purist gatekeepers. Just like I was with the prequels.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Dec 27, 2019 17:26:16 GMT
Oh, now we are corrupt. Is just super. Thanks a lot for poisoning this positive forum with personal offenses that we, the corrupt ones avoided at all cost. Is great holiday present, thanks. As I'm qualified as not worthy to talk here, I'm just leaving. Have a nice time. I won't participate in hierarchical discussion where there are high and low quality fans. The moderator will decide that this should continue or not. I personally think is not. Just ignore Pasquali's sock account. His ignorant/mindless attacks and spam posts are his trademark behaviour. Perhaps Subtext Mining will do something about it. George Lucas would have brought back Palpatine. He did it in the Dark Empire comic. Frankly, any other villain would make it separate from the first 6 movies. An Anakin Force-ghost would have been silly. I was always afraid of that rumor. His grandson helped Rey defeat Palpatine, and imitated his sacrifice, so I don't see how this ending dishonored him. Not sure what's so unbelievable about Palpatine having children. You can say that these criticisms are different from prequel-bashing, but it really always comes down to pointing out what fans call its strengths and calling them flaws. 1. Lucas wouldn't have brought Palpatine as he managed to confirm to Ian McDiarmid. 2. Anakin's Force spirit would have been silly after being needlessly and illogically ignored for two full movies (that's what I'd call silly). But in the context of the sequel trilogy, and saga, no. It wouldn't. 3. Everything that was already explained before: 4. Do you call completely illogical and unexplainable decisions as "strengths"? Can you explain Palpatine's plan? This is a genuine question, by the way. I really want to understand the logic behind it because I see none. Can you explain what's the point of the First Order (which already easily defeated the Republic)? Can you explain why he wants Rey destroyed and at the same time want her to inherit his Empire? Can explain how he even managed to assemble the forces of that Empire without the Republic and the First Order knowing? Can you explain what's the point of Snoke? Can you explain how Palpatine is "all the Sith" and Rey "all the Jedi"? Can you explain what's the basic story of the sequel trilogy? I can do it with the previous trilogies, but I'm yet to understand what this trilogy is about.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 17:32:44 GMT
Turn off your targeting computer and watch the movie. Or don't.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 17:59:26 GMT
Oh and in case anyone forgot, George lies. A lot! He changes his story constantly about what he does and doesn't have planned for these movies. Remember when he publicly admitted to JJ that he made up Star Wars as he went along and tricked people into thinking he had sone grand plan? Remember when he said there WAS no sequel trilogy, AFTER saying that there was, for years? If he told Ian McDiarmid anything about his plans for the sequels, it proves absolutely nothing. He's been going around saying he was going to make a sequel trilogy about microscopic Force-eaters. Cool idea, but was he ever going to do that? Come on. You can't believe anything he says about these things.
|
|
|
Post by truestarwarsnerd01 on Dec 27, 2019 19:39:41 GMT
Oh and in case anyone forgot, George lies. A lot! He changes his story constantly about what he does and doesn't have planned for these movies. Remember when he publicly admitted to JJ that he made up Star Wars as he went along and tricked people into thinking he had sone grand plan? Remember when he said there WAS no sequel trilogy, AFTER saying that there was, for years? If he told Ian McDiarmid anything about his plans for the sequels, it proves absolutely nothing. He's been going around saying he was going to make a sequel trilogy about microscopic Force-eaters. Cool idea, but was he ever going to do that? Come on. You can't believe anything he says about these things. Yes and no. I don’t think he was lying about doing that story.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Dec 27, 2019 22:15:23 GMT
I've said more about the movie than anyone in this thread. Most criticism of this film is a distraction from discussion of the film itself and I can't take responsibility for it. There are plenty of other places to discuss whether or not the prequels were fairly judged or if Lucas should have had more creative control over the franchise, after he sold it, over six years ago. Those are old and dead topics which have nothing to do with the movie itself, especially if those discussing it have not even seen the movie in question. Now go ahead and call me a troll, for defending this film, which this thread is named for, from purist gatekeepers. Just like I was with the prequels.
Alex has said plenty more than you. And Emperorferus and I are having a lengthy exchange where we break the film up into its constituent parts.
Just what exactly is your definition of "discussion" when it comes to film? I think any sensible person would acknowledge that it includes points of criticism. If you want to keep hurling insults at us like "purist gatekeepers" for simply disagreeing with your view, I suggest you leave because you're not making any friends here.
And now you've revealed your true colours. People like you have no place here. This site is and always has been a haven for George Lucas fans, and if you have a problem with that, you're free to "turn off your computer" and go.
I agree with your thoughts. stampidhd280pro and his/her sidekick, truestarwarsnerd01, have railroaded what was a healthy discussion of TROS (from a prequelist perspective) into a place for attacking the creator of Star Wars. I don't think we should tolerate this bad behaviour any longer.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Dec 27, 2019 22:28:43 GMT
It's not an attack on George. I'm just pointing out that he says things that aren't true when it comes to what he has up his sleeve. You can call the mess I walked into "healthy", but it was clear that there was an agenda to deride this movie from the beginning of this is "discussion". Movies arent like message board arguments where you section them off in bullet points and nag about the elements you wish weren't there. It's embarrassing to fandom and an insult to the work of the creators. It's exactly the same lazy, stubborn, miserable mindset that made being a prequel fan such a chore.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on Dec 28, 2019 20:30:48 GMT
I don’t mean to drag this topic out, but I don’t see what George’s honesty or consistency have anything to do with Disney’s or its affiliates.
By being the creator of the Star Wars universe, George doesn’t need to have the same standard applied to him in terms of keeping things the same versus changing/retconning. Now, on the other hand, other people are continuing the story for him. Yes, they do legally own it, and there is the question of whether post-Lucas works count as Star Wars at all, but even if they do, they still have the fans to answer to in terms of respecting the work of the man who created the property they own.
Making Lucas’s two protagonists little more than placeholders in the story of Rey and her evil grandfather is not doing that.
Addressing specific changes George might have made:
When he said he conceived Vader being Luke’s father: Maybe he didn’t have it planned from the beginning, but when he made the first Star Wars, he didn’t know how successful it would be and how many more films were feasible in the series. I’m aware of Leigh Brackett’s draft, but because Lucas felt the story decision was right for the sequel, there’s nothing wrong with changing Vader’s identity. It definitely was a good decision for the series, as far as I can tell.
When he said he conceived the prequels: I don’t believe that Lucas had every detail of the prequels written out by the end of the 1970s. However, I do believe that he always intended to show the CONCEPTS that were ultimately displayed in the PT, specifically in terms of the political realm and especially Anakin’s fall.
Luke and Leia being siblings: I couldn’t tell you exactly when Lucas conceived this, but the twist also works with the two preceding movies (no I haven’t forgotten the TESB kiss). Again, he felt it was the right decision for his universe, so a (slight) retcon is allowable here.
Midichlorians: I’m not personally a fan of them, but I respect that Lucas felt they were a part of his narrative, and I take them as canon. While I like the OT explanation of the Force as it was, the midichlorian concept doesn’t contradict the idea of an energy “penetrating us and binding the galaxy together.” Now we know what causes that to happen and what causes us to feel the mystical energy. No, I don’t literally mean “us.”
|
|