|
Post by Cryogenic on Sept 22, 2022 19:19:58 GMT
In some ways, the better point of comparison for Elizabeth II's reign in Star Wars would be a Jedi knight. Senator and even Queen Amidala would share more similarities with a political figure, especially a tragic one like a JFK or a Gandhi. I believe the late Queen understood her reign as a sacral calling, or a vocation, a selfless devotion to a very old national tradition and nation. It's not unlike a Jedi: someone who is dedicated their whole life to an institution of great antiquity, religious mystique and ties with a state (The Galactic Republic). And a Jedi tends not have a huge say in joining either, as you inherit great Force powers by chance, and are recruited at a young age. It's not a prefect comparison, as there's only one monarch, while there are thousands of Lucas' warrior monks at a time, but when one thinks of the personality of Elizabeth, it's hard not to be reminded of the stoicism of a member of the Jedi Council. Rigid maybe, unelected for sure, and yet still providing a sense of assurance for the people of a large entity. Wonderful point of comparison. We all like the Star Wars Saga (again: I am primarily referring to the original six films) because the films are a tad abstract and post-modern, but they are also unapologetically old-fashioned (some would say timeless) and contain many antique verities. Our Queen Elizabeth II was practically the embodiment of living history; and she provided some genuine, much-needed continuity between the old and the new. Her presence enriched the world, just because she was there: a living, breathing relic of the past, yet someone who perfectly incarnated many of those important values and made them seem like they still had a place in the modern world. A rock of ages. Soaking up all the love for her online has been most edifying. I learned the other night that even my sister, somewhat to my surprise, made it down to London to visit Her Majesty lying in state. I'm no staunch royalist, but our Queen was a high-value person who touched the hearts of many and I think she is going to be dearly missed. Thanks for that article. I guess these would be the three core paragraphs: Ouch. And, I daresay, aiming for a touch of non-jingoistic sobriety, every word of the above is true. What is royalty but a grand performance? The declawing of the monarchy and the withering away of "the divine right of kings" has surely prepared for monarchy's ultimate end -- as a legal institution, at least (shaking away monarchic and dynastic tendencies in the human animal, and royalistic fantasies of one sort or another, may be a harder trick to pull off). This bit got me: In her twilight years, there was a touch of Prequel Yoda about Queen Elizabeth, like in the scene at the start of AOTC of Yoda warmly greeting Senator Amidala (so: the Queen greeting herself):
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Sept 22, 2022 20:07:28 GMT
And yeah, on Andor... I think I might eventually watch Andor, but for now I can't help but ask the question, why? What is the point, what is the purpose? Could it be content for the sake of content? Vapid consumerism masquerading as some kind of vehicle for social justice? It's hard to fathom the reason for much of Star Wars existing, outside of the original six movies. You would, I suspect, greatly enjoy the social critique of Theodor Adorno, AD. Andor! Adorno! Arch Duke! Oh, my. Start here: Title: SOCIOLOGY - Theodor Adorno Channel: The School of Life Uploaded: 5 Jun 2015 Well, Adorno himself furnished us with a useful term: the culture industry. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industryHere's the actual essay (or a part of it): www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htmEssentially, an endless parade of entertainment goods, as if issued from a factory production line, has a chilling effect on individual expression and engagement. Even the content producers under Disney are open about their contempt for the individual. Check out a recent discussion concerning the remarks of Lucasfilm employee Leslye Headland (currently working on "The Acolyte"), who baldly asserted in an interview that everybody in a film or television production is replaceable, even the writer and director. Thus, entertainment is merely capitalistic enterprise; and just as a worker or a defective part is replaced in a factory when it is seen as an impediment to the smooth operation of the factory (i.e., a threat to the bottom line), so anyone who may challenge the existing order or place the image of the company or its pursuit of profits in (real or perceived) jeopardy, will be automatically booted -- i.e., handed their pink slip and dismissed. And these people now running the show (or an area within the factory) are just fine with that. Equivalently, you then get a retinue of content addicts and factory management apologists springing up, ready to defend the content producers and the running of the factory (and the mechanistic capitalistic imperatives it is based on and which are ruthlessly enforced) at a moment's notice. Just like journalists and protestors standing up to a fascist government who are rounded up and beaten by police and security forces loyal to the leader or the state, these jackbooted keyboard warriors are all over you before you can blink, eager to denounce you for your retrograde opinions and subject you to their re-education programme (which normally means being "warned" for violating community standards and then being promptly suspended/removed should you contest the warning or step out of line again). Today, they use the sword and shield (or hammer and sickle) of social justice, bleating about diversity, inclusivity, equality (and other dogwhistle terms) -- ergo, if you speak out and contest the orthodoxy, you are obviously a blaspheming heretic, and whatever punishment you receive is more than merited. That said... I'll wait to see how "Andor" pans out according to its first few episodes, at least (I'm planning to watch them a little later). I was prepared to give "Obi-Wan" a chance and I enjoyed it initially; and while I'm now more cynical about giving modern Star Wars content any more of my time and attention, "Andor" looks at least as worthy as the former. It appears to have higher production values, a more visionary quality, sharper writing; more heft. All in all, it seems more sure of itself, a little more baked in its own grimdark juices, striving to perhaps be the "Babylon 5" or "Deep Space Nine" (for sci-fi nerds) of its respective in-house genre. While that seems to be the basic tone/flavour of many television series these days, it's still somewhat uncharted territory for Star Wars. It kinda feels wrong: boundary-breaking. But done with an authority and a level of artistic consistency wherein it might just get away with its moody conceits. If this series is a con, or a misfire, I'm probably done with all things Disney Star Wars, but I'll let it land where it may and speak whatever truths it's capable of speaking before deciding what's to be done.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Sept 23, 2022 1:38:06 GMT
Ouch. And, I daresay, aiming for a touch of non-jingoistic sobriety, every word of the above is true. What is royalty but a grand performance? The declawing of the monarchy and the withering away of "the divine right of kings" has surely prepared for monarchy's ultimate end -- as a legal institution, at least (shaking away monarchic and dynastic tendencies in the human animal, and royalistic fantasies of one sort or another, may be a harder trick to pull off). This bit got me It's all amateur, tabloid, wishy-washy, celebrity drivel these days. Glorified ambassadors. Go big or go home. To hell I say with all this theatrical pretence! Vive le république!
But a certain Star Wars alumni knew what the real European monarchs were about.
*apologies to any offended Saxons, but you are the foundation of the Anglo-Saxons, and thus all the evils of the modern world according to the media, so you had it coming.
The Charles our Christopher Lee sings/re-enacts in this heavy metal album (actually he made 2) is the namesake of the new King of England. Charlemagne, literally Charles the Great, crowned "Emperor of the Romans" in the year 800. What's more is that Lee is a confirmed direct descendent of him, arguably one of the most powerful figures in European history, whom all the royal houses of Europe trace their lineage, and who is even referenced (it's not a real quote) in Ingram's beloved Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade by Henry Jones: "I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne: 'Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky.' The first renaissance occurred under his reign. He could legitimately claim "I am The West". Biden & Trump are amateur knockoffs
Unfortunately his empire split up after his death, and kept fragmenting as his grandsons started squabbling typical medieval half-wits. But the curious thing is that territory of the founding members of the European Union looks almost identical. His capital of Aachen is a hop, skip and jump from Brussels. The legacy is still there.
All that being a long-winded way of saying that Christopher Lee is proper royalty I mean, can Harry and Megan say any of the following? All they have is a podcast and Netflix special pfffff....
He also fought for Finland against the Soviet Union in the Winter War. And oh so much more...
|
|
|
Post by smittysgelato on Sept 23, 2022 1:47:46 GMT
Princess Ann, AKA SMITTY, is the most legit royal of all time.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Sept 23, 2022 3:05:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Nov 12, 2022 17:07:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Dec 24, 2022 19:09:33 GMT
'Tis the season for rewatching the prequels! This trailer gets me particularly excited:
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Mar 26, 2023 21:23:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Apr 18, 2023 15:31:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Apr 18, 2023 20:07:28 GMT
'Tis the season for rewatching the prequels! This trailer gets me particularly excited:
Not to be a jerk, but, I hate this. I hate modern trailers with an inner burning white-hot flame of Norman invading, berserker rage passion. I hate modern trailers with their stupid, loud hammering, Audiomachine strings & synth choirs synced with repeated hard cuts to black. I hate modern trailers more than I hate grown men who stroll around a hotel lobby barefoot. I hate modern trailers more than I hate people who keep pressing the crosswalk button over and over again, as if that's going to somehow speed up traffic. I hate modern trailers more than I hate fortune cookies minus their actual fortunes—you had ONE job, lowly factory girl! I hate modern trailers more than I hate zoomers who get offended watching Ghostbusters for the first time when Peter Venkman asks the librarian if she's menstruating—that's the point of his character: he's a sarcastic smartass who doesn't want to be there. God. Lighten up. I hate modern trailers more than I hate beets. Who the hell likes beets?!
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Apr 19, 2023 0:12:37 GMT
Thank you, AD. Like Palpatine, I have returned.
|
|
|
Post by smittysgelato on Apr 19, 2023 3:58:18 GMT
Thank you, AD. Like Palpatine, I have returned. You will have to regale us with your convoluted cloning program involving Grogu, The Zillo Beast, Omega, midi-chlorians, and everyone's favourite....aborted Snokes!
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Apr 19, 2023 5:52:05 GMT
Thank you, AD. Like Palpatine, I have returned.
'Sup, Cryo.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Apr 22, 2023 13:19:15 GMT
Thank you, AD. Like Palpatine, I have returned.
No, no, I meant it more like Palpatine discovering the burned-to-a-crisp Vader on the volcanic shores of Mustafar in 19 BBY.
"He's still alive!"
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Apr 22, 2023 13:26:21 GMT
Not to be a jerk, but, I hate this. I hate modern trailers
Well, the old school trailers of the 2000s gave away the whole movie. Were those really any better?
The quality of cinema has dramatically plunged since the 2010s, that's the real disaster. Give the trailers a rest.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Apr 22, 2023 14:31:09 GMT
I like what you did here. The Sextet may indeed "diminish" in the eyes of future Star Wars fans who may prefer the newer iterations, and therefore the Sextet will be "passed over" for the second sibling. That being said, only the truly worthy get to sail into the West. Maybe there will be some Gimlis and Frodos who will join the Sextet in the West...but not many. And of course, Gimli REVERED Galadriel, so too must any future Star Wars revere the Lady Padme.
Nuff said.
|
|
|
Post by smittysgelato on Apr 22, 2023 19:23:53 GMT
That belongs on my wall.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Apr 22, 2023 19:42:23 GMT
That belongs on my this forum's wall.
Mods... dew it!
We need faces on the banner
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Apr 23, 2023 2:39:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Apr 23, 2023 3:07:23 GMT
I'd like to give Padme a pearl necklace. What?
|
|