|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 23, 2022 3:54:34 GMT
The quoted tweet is worth savouring: She's so right. That guy is wrong -- in my opinion -- that Star Wars doesn't work on the big screen; or stopped working past a certain point (he seems to be another in an endless parade of OT fanboys). It can and does work exceptionally well on the big screen. It has always been an incredibly cinematic thing. That's the meaning behind the Millennium Falcon. Its name is a nod to "The Maltese Falcon", and the MF itself is a gorgeous hunk of agglomerated scrap metal; like the films, which pilfer ravenously from many cinematic sources, but always fly stylishly, erasing all Death Star contenders in the process. On television, Star Wars just looks and feels like 1990s video game cutscenes. Bad.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jun 23, 2022 13:37:48 GMT
1990s video game cut scenes was my first impression of the TFA opening crawl, and opening sequence.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jun 26, 2022 22:40:04 GMT
I'll see this later, but I think that generally people who hate that Lucas didn't meet their expectations, give the other team members credit that they didn't deserved (if I can say so). That's why Kasdan and other are somehow overestimated and Lucas is "the bad" and "non-talented" one that is, of course a total nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Jun 27, 2022 3:17:15 GMT
1990s video game cut scenes was my first impression of the TFA opening crawl, and opening sequence. All I got is what I always get from Try-Hard Abrams, a marmalade of Michael Bayhem dressed up with desperate imitation-Spielberg, which is saying something when that opening sequence is nearly the highlight of the movie.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 28, 2022 17:08:16 GMT
1990s video game cut scenes was my first impression of the TFA opening crawl, and opening sequence. All I got is what I always get from Try-Hard Abrams, a marmalade of Michael Bayhem dressed up with desperate imitation-Spielberg, which is saying something when that opening sequence is nearly the highlight of the movie. All of that can be recognised, and yet... TFA does have some delicacy and nuance to it. It's a little soft and tender; and the whole thing plays like a little dream. I was watching it again last night. Well, the second half. I figured I'd just put the film on after Rey opens the chest and goes through that vision sequence in Maz's castle. "I'll just watch the next 10 or 15 minutes," I said to myself. I watched all the way to the end credits. A fine little film with some cool stuff in it. The one thing that really stands out after the prequels, though, and has since it came out, is the amazing lack of scale and grandeur. JJ definitely threw the gear stick in reverse there. Still, it plays out in something of an enchanting way, and I noticed the beauty of Han's characterisation like never before, having recently watched "Solo" for the first time. The beautiful colours and filmic appearance of the image were also really appreciated after watching the Obi-Wan series. Even the effects work, while never astounding, is controlled and satisfying. The green holograms on the Resistance base actually do look pretty nice; the way JJ has them stretched like a gauze over the actors' faces brings a lullaby feel. And the crust of Starkiller Base rupturing is a pretty cool moment as parked TIEs are swallowed up and a critical alarm wails inside the control room. Slick camera work, JJ. Heck, even the duelling at the end seemed less absurd than it used to. I really noticed this time how Finn and Rey were doing their best to withstand Kylo in his weakened state. Finn does more to wound Kylo early on than Rey manages (she flails more than he does and basically retreats), but Kylo quickly recovers enough strength after thumping his flank to see Finn off. He is comfortably pushing Rey back, all the way to the cliff edge, until he goes a bit soft on her and pledges himself, a bit Anakin-at-the-fireplace-like, to be her teacher. This is when the tables are suddenly turned and Rey goes deep inside and uses the Force to get the better of him. I used to think the film turned the Force into a bit of a joke when Kylo captured Rey and she broke out of her shackles by mind-tricking that stormtrooper. But this time, it seemed more like she was feeling behind her surface emotions, concentrating on a deeper feeling she likely began to grasp more distinctly after Kylo invaded her mind, capitalising on what Maz told her. I dunno. TFA... sorta seemed.... better... this time. Not perfect, not ideal, but better. I've always liked the lush feel JJ gave the movie. The end of the movie with Luke standing at the cliff edge made me think Star Wars is more like some ancient Celtic nature poem or something; all the machinery and technology being, of course, hints of a dystopian onslaught, some strange cosmic transformation, to come. Luke looks very Druidic at the end. Rey holding out Anakin's lightsaber to him is very mythical and very meta. It represents JJ asking a question: "What will you (Rian Johnson and whomever) do with Star Wars now?" *sigh* Then there's the nostalgia angle -- the nostalgia of the movie being a thing in the ocean of time. 2015 already seems like quite a while ago. It's impossible for me to strongly dislike TFA. It evokes a mixture of warm emotions and a sense of comfort I can't quite put my finger on.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 28, 2022 17:30:40 GMT
I'll see this later, but I think that generally people who hate that Lucas didn't meet their expectations, give the other team members credit that they didn't deserved (if I can say so). That's why Kasdan and other are somehow overestimated and Lucas is "the bad" and "non-talented" one that is, of course a total nonsense. Not you specifically, Tony (fair comment there), but... Please let's not go after Lawrence Kasdan. He's a good, kind person. I'm sure he knows he can't measure up to George Lucas. Who can? That's an immensely high standard. At Comic-Con in 2015, he did call George Lucas a "monster genius" (starts at 04:00): Title: STAR WARS THE FORCE AWAKENS Comic Con Panel Channel: Flicks And The City Date: 11 Jul 2015 Kathy looks a bit nervous as he builds George up. LOL. Then take a look at his Wikipedia entry and read his quotes under "Style and inspirations": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_KasdanHe's clearly a smart and talented guy. He speaks like a writer and some of his tastes very much seem to overlap with Lucas'. Some of his responses here are also interesting, and I'll quote one below: www.wired.com/2015/11/lawrence-kasdan-qa/
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jun 29, 2022 9:45:04 GMT
Yeah, I believe that comes up in the story conferences in The Making of Return of the Jedi. I feel Kasdan sometimes comes out as needlessly obtuse and unable to read between the lines. IIRC, George was explaining the difference between the roles of Obi-Wan and Yoda, or the roles of a Jedi Knight and a Jedi Master, which is the same difference between a warrior and a priest. Yoda and the Emperor have the positions of "priests". They teach and preach, they don't necessarily go out there swinging their lightsaber and getting their hands dirty. Their role is more spiritual than physical. That doesn't mean Obi-Wan and Vader are not spiritual or that Yoda and the Emperor are not physical. It's simply the archetype or social role they are meant to play in the story.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 29, 2022 16:20:22 GMT
Yeah, I believe that comes up in the story conferences in The Making of Return of the Jedi. I feel Kasdan sometimes comes out as needlessly obtuse and unable to read between the lines. IIRC, George was explaining the difference between the roles of Obi-Wan and Yoda, or the roles of a Jedi Knight and a Jedi Master, which is the same difference between a warrior and a priest. Yoda and the Emperor have the positions of "priests". They teach and preach, they don't necessarily go out there swinging their lightsaber and getting their hands dirty. Their role is more spiritual than physical. That doesn't mean Obi-Wan and Vader are not spiritual or that Yoda and the Emperor are not physical. It's simply the archetype or social role they are meant to play in the story. On that note, it's interesting that TFA is the first Saga film (at least in a nominal sense) to not feature a major Jedi mentor figure guiding the young heroes at any point. Instead, those duties are shifted onto Han, an unlikely keeper of the Jedi flame. This would seem to reflect Kasdan's view that a Jedi Master is open to the world and active within it. At the same time, kicking Luke out of the film, making him the person everyone is looking for, and saving his appearance for the final scene, may also reflect a certain nervousness or self-aware inadequacy on Kasdan's (and Abrams') part. There is some concession made to the fact that a Jedi Master ought to be a pretty special person, so stoic and removed as to almost not exist, confined to the edge of the known world.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jun 29, 2022 16:54:44 GMT
Yes, I agree for the most part. Abrams and Kasdan weren't brave enough to touch on the spiritual aspects of Star Wars. On the surface, that would be a good thing, considering their ignorance and misunderstanding about the underlying mythology is evident in the many interviews they have given, not just for the movie but over the years. So they played safe and avoided it entirely.
But I think the fact that they placed Han in the role of the mentor (which was meant for Luke) is also part of their decision to play safe and satisfy their own nostalgia.
I've said it before, people can gush for Han all they want and pretend that it's the fan favourite, but (not unlike Han), it's playing a facade. It's a superficial appeal. In the end, Luke is who people really care about. Han was as mistreated as a character in TFA as Luke was in TLJ, but you don't hear people complaining about Han. For the most part, they didn't mind. Some even applauded the u-turn. But you did hear people complain about Luke in a significant scale. Of course, after the damage they've done, they are now using Luke the Jedi as a memberberry in a hollow attempt buy back some goodwill from fandom.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on Jun 29, 2022 17:52:02 GMT
Making use of Luke as a Jedi (I think he will likely feature in Ahsoka’s series as he has so far) rings hollow when his fate is already sealed. I’d be more interested in his journey post ROTJ if a different timeline was being followed rather than the one that leads to the ST.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jun 29, 2022 18:01:53 GMT
Even if they ignored the sequels, it still rings hollow because it's being done just to get a momentary emotional response from the audience, and not because the story asked for it.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 29, 2022 18:59:08 GMT
Yes, I agree for the most part. Abrams and Kasdan weren't brave enough to touch on the spiritual aspects of Star Wars. On the surface, that would be a good thing, considering their ignorance and misunderstanding about the underlying mythology is evident in the many interviews they have given, not just for the movie but over the years. So they played safe and avoided it entirely. But I think the fact that they placed Han in the role of the mentor (which was meant for Luke) is also part of their decision to play safe and satisfy their own nostalgia. I've said it before, people can gush for Han all they want and pretend that it's the fan favourite, but (not unlike Han), it's playing a facade. It's a superficial appeal. In the end, Luke is who people really care about. Han was as mistreated as a character in TFA as Luke was in TLJ, but you don't hear people complaining about Han. For the most part, they didn't mind. Some even applauded the u-turn. But you did hear people complain about Luke in a significant scale. Of course, after the damage they've done, they are now using Luke the Jedi as a memberberry in a hollow attempt buy back some goodwill from fandom. Fans Hated the Kindler Gentler Han in ROTJ Don't they know what Character Development Means?!
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 29, 2022 19:57:34 GMT
Yes, I agree for the most part. Abrams and Kasdan weren't brave enough to touch on the spiritual aspects of Star Wars. On the surface, that would be a good thing, considering their ignorance and misunderstanding about the underlying mythology is evident in the many interviews they have given, not just for the movie but over the years. So they played safe and avoided it entirely. But I think the fact that they placed Han in the role of the mentor (which was meant for Luke) is also part of their decision to play safe and satisfy their own nostalgia. The centrality of Han and the sentimentality surrounding his death certainly show a bias and a deficiency in imagination on the part of Kasdan and Abrams. And yes, having it be Han instead of Luke, when it really should have been Luke, was definitely done for the nostalgia points. On the other hand, Kasdan went on to write "Solo", which doesn't do a half-bad job of trying to lend the character a bit more depth in the OT and in TFA. I could appreciate Han choosing to stay behind and help the Resistance fighters on Starkiller Base with new eyes on my last viewing, as well as his poignant attempt to reach out to his son. Yeah, that could be well be reflected in the poor box office performance of the aforementioned "Solo". Fans were still dealing -- or reeling -- with what happened with Luke, and there just isn't the same appeal to Han, no matter how much they tried to capitalise on his popularity from the OT. Fans developed their devotion to Star Wars because of the Jedi and the Force and the mysticism surrounding both. They can be distracted with other characters and ideas for a while, but in the end, it's the "meat" they're looking for, and all the other stuff is merely a side dish.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jun 29, 2022 23:07:03 GMT
I'll see this later, but I think that generally people who hate that Lucas didn't meet their expectations, give the other team members credit that they didn't deserved (if I can say so). That's why Kasdan and other are somehow overestimated and Lucas is "the bad" and "non-talented" one that is, of course a total nonsense. Not you specifically, Tony (fair comment there), but... Please let's not go after Lawrence Kasdan. He's a good, kind person. I'm sure he knows he can't measure up to George Lucas. Who can? That's an immensely high standard. At Comic-Con in 2015, he did call George Lucas a "monster genius" (starts at 04:00): Title: STAR WARS THE FORCE AWAKENS Comic Con Panel Channel: Flicks And The City Date: 11 Jul 2015 Kathy looks a bit nervous as he builds George up. LOL. Then take a look at his Wikipedia entry and read his quotes under "Style and inspirations": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_KasdanHe's clearly a smart and talented guy. He speaks like a writer and some of his tastes very much seem to overlap with Lucas'. Some of his responses here are also interesting, and I'll quote one below: www.wired.com/2015/11/lawrence-kasdan-qa/The overestimation came from the fans, not from Kasdan himself. My point is that all this is part of the trend "SW is better without Lucas" which apparently is not true. It doesn't mean that Kasdan doesn't have talent, because such arguments are not pro- Kasdan (that would be completely OK for me, of course) but they are in fact anti-Lucas.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 30, 2022 0:57:19 GMT
tonygSo did you watch the video i sent you?
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 30, 2022 22:44:10 GMT
Subtext Mining From Youtube I agree the prequels should have been set earlier. from the OT i got the impression The Clone Wars were 50 Years ago, not 20, and also that the empire existed for much longer, but then where would Vader's children have come from? but all that the Jedi are all but extinct nobody remembers them thing would make far more sense if they had been scare for a long time before that even Lucas wanted to show that for over 1,000 Generations the Jedi Knights were the keepers of Peace in the Old Republic but the timeline was always messed up or people in the Star Wars Universe are extra forgetful
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 30, 2022 22:47:19 GMT
Subtext Mining Now People are Complaining about the Timeline in the movies Thinking The Clone Wars should have been 50 Years ago Instead of 19 People are always complaining about something, Joe.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 30, 2022 22:56:46 GMT
Cryogenic see my new response does he make sense?
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 30, 2022 23:36:18 GMT
Cryogenic see my new response does he make sense? Sort of. You really need to quote whomever you're quoting properly and give a name/source and maybe use a quote box. Either way, don't worry too much about random complaining. It isn't worth it.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 30, 2022 23:40:06 GMT
CryogenicBut is 19 Years not long enough compared to 50?
|
|