|
Post by mikeximus on Nov 12, 2019 19:34:33 GMT
Well, as a customer of Verizon wireless I get a free year of Disney+. I wouldn't have paid for it otherwise. There is only 1 Episode out so far for the season, and it seems to be titled "Chapter 1" My overall first thoughts are I am intrigued... very intrigued. Of course there is a multitude of nostalgic callbacks to the OT, that for me, gets a bit eyerolly. SPOILERS AHEAD... So the show opens up with... a cantina scene. Some thugs are beating up on some alien (not sure what he is) threatening to remove parts of him to apparently sell. In walks the Mandalorian. What ensues is to be expected. Thugs pick a fight with the Bounty Hunter, and the Bounty Hunter wipes the floor with them, thus revealing that he is actually there to collect the bounty on the same alien that the thugs were beating up. A speeder scene harkening back to ANH, some strange monster attacking the Mandalorians ship, and the Mandalorian freezing his bounty in Carbonite, and we finally get to some lore. The Mandalorian is a Bounty Hunter in the time after the Galactic Civil War. The Empire is gone, or so it seems. The Mandalorian is the best in the parsec. So when he hands in his current bounties and wants more, he is given a special bounty, one that does not use the Bounty Hunter's tracking technology, it's strictly a face to face transaction. So the Mandalorian arrives at the meeting place, and as the doors open, he is greeted by a group of Stormtroopers in old, beat up, armor. Sitting behind the troopers is the man in charge, clearly a holdover from the Empire as he wears a large Imperial Insignia around his neck. He explains to the Mandalorian that the bounty is preferred alive, but, if things get complicated, proof of termination will be needed, at half the bounty. A doctor objects to the possible killing, but is overruled. As a down payment, the Imperial offers the Mandalorian a block of Beksar, the material used to create Mandalorian Armor. The Mandalorian accepts the Bounty, and heads off. The Mandalorian than enters what appears to be a secret enclave for Mandalorians. There is a reference to some kind of purge, so I am assuming this enclave is where the Mandalorinas are trying to rebuild their numbers. He brings the Beksar to the Mandalorian armorsmith, where she makes him a new shoulder pauldron, with the remaining beksar going to help "foundlings" of which we find out that the Mandalorian himself was a foundling. Some flashbacks scenes shows what we are sure to assume is the Mandalorian and his family (sans helmets) running from blaster fire and explosions. So it would be safe to assume that a "foundling" is some one of the Mandalorian race that survived the purge, and was found. With new piece of armor attached, the Mandalorian heads to the coordinates of the last known location of his bounty. After some interactions with one of the locals that helps him, he travels to the compound where the bounty is held up. A battle ensues in which we are introduced to IG-11 whom is after the same bounty. They agree to work together for half the reward each. After toasting all the guards of the compound, the two Bounty Hunters enter the main building, and find their bounty is a 50 year old... BABY.... IG-11 prepares to kill the baby, as he says that his commission clearly stated to kill the bounty. This tells us that at least two different parties knew of this baby. However, before the assassin droid can kill the baby, the Mandalorian blows a hole in IG-11's head... The Baby? That's right a baby from Yoda's species... And I have to admit, that is one cute little bugger. The final shot of the episode is that of the Mandalorian offering his finger to the baby and it reaches out of it's crib to grab his finger! I have to say it was pretty cool to see the little baby Yoda peek from under his blankets. I did get goosebumps. Is this little guy or girl force sensitive? Is the Force making a come back? Obviously there has to be a mom and dad, where are they? As I said, I am very intrigued so far. I really enjoyed the episode. I'm looking forward to the second one when it is released.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 13, 2019 23:37:36 GMT
I've decided to take a peak out of curiosity.
Let's just say that this looked more Star Wars than everything Disney has done so far with the franchise. It doesn't shy away from showing and using aliens (specifically classic aliens from the original saga), it takes advantage of what came before while showing new things.
This is not exactly a compliment but more of a criticism of Disney Wars. Still, it's a plus for a Disney property. On the other hand, this is a blatant Jango/Boba Fett rip-off. And while they were not Mandalorians, they were bounty hunters with that visual image. Now we have a Mandalorian who is a bounty hunter. And every other Mandalorian had his own paint job, making them look even more like Boba Fett wannabes... One could almost get the idea that that armor equals bounty hunter... A big minus.
Also, while we did go to new planets, they all basically look like Tatooine villages. I get that it's TV and budget is limited, but Lucas never shied away from his vision. And while he had limitations, he made an effort to get past them. Here, it seems they have resigned themselves to that limited Tatooine backdrop.
Now, while the episode itself was mostly harmless, it did brought up a lot of lore questions and other relatively "minor" issues:
- what's the deal with bounties being trackable by those silver devices? How does this even work? Are all people trackable? How can that be? This doesn't make any sense considering the original movies. - what's that planet from the flashbacks? Doesn't look like Mandalore as established in The Clone Wars. - why aren't they able to make Star Wars versions of stuff? Not only has this happened with the other Disney movies, but it happened here again. Regular blacksmith tools? Regular glasses? Come on. I know it's not only up to him, but Filoni should know better after all those years working with Lucas. - how the heck does the Mandalorian have a carbon freezing chamber within his ship? - why are they taking the exceptional case of Han in TESB and are treating carbon freezing as a common way to hold bounties? - what have they done with the Trandoshans? They look like Star Trek rejects. - speaking of Star Trek rejects, that blue guy didn't fit Star Wars at all. Specially his dialogue. Also, modern humor, borderline breaking the fourth wall. - did we really need to see a Star Wars toilet?
A few good things:
- IG-11. Both in terms of action and interaction. - The Ugnaught guy was interesting. - The blurrg was well done (but we never got to see why it needed to be ridden). - The riding lesson was a good break of tone. - Again, plently of classic aliens being used. - The action scenes were well shot.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Nov 14, 2019 3:02:22 GMT
Alex: "Let's just say that this looked more Star Wars than everything Disney has done so far with the franchise. It doesn't shy away from showing and using aliens (specifically classic aliens from the original saga), it takes advantage of what came before while showing new things."
I've been trying to think of a place to mention a little something that came to me recently; ever since about RotJ, lucas has put something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue into his Star Wars films.
*(IV is all new, so there's nothing old to put in it. And V doesn't really provide much opportunity for it).
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Nov 14, 2019 4:11:36 GMT
I haven't seen "The Mandalorian", apart from some pre-release footage and a couple of trailers -- or one trailer? -- so I can't really comment on the show at present. It looks pretty well-made, and I wouldn't want to overly trash it in advance. That said, it probably won't be to my taste; and I did give it a bit of a pounding (at least, in passing) on Naboo News some months back. To be perfectly honest, little of Star Wars holds great appeal for me, outside of the saga films. Then again, this is an interesting and rather transitional (some might say phasic) time for Lucas' baby. All is open to change. Alex: "Let's just say that this looked more Star Wars than everything Disney has done so far with the franchise. It doesn't shy away from showing and using aliens (specifically classic aliens from the original saga), it takes advantage of what came before while showing new things." I've been trying to think of a place to mention a little something that came to me recently; ever since about RotJ, lucas has put something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue into his Star Wars films. *(IV is all new, so there's nothing old to put in it. And V doesn't really provide much opportunity for it). The Elvis song sprang immediately to mind -- it's one of my favourite recordings of his. And I like alternate takes. "...and a sixpence in her shoe." But anyway, I think Episode IV (and V) perfectly fits your idiomatic analogy. There is much, for example, that is old and borrowed in the original film: www.moongadget.com/origins/index.htmlOn more than one occasion, Lucas has also spoken about how humanity hasn't moved on much in the past 30,000 years -- since the dawn of human civilisation. Outwardly, perhaps. But inwardly? We basically still have the same brains and the same genes. Anthropology, as you know, is one of Lucas' prime fascinations. He studied it at college and it is clearly a lifelong interest; and it's of a piece with his curious/seeker nature in general. Why do people do what they do? This essential question frames and animates all of his film art. The "new" and the "blue" of Star Wars also pervade the films. As Lucas argued with Charlie Rose in 2015, Star Wars itself is "something new" in the human emporium. Blue, well: aside from the starting text ("A long time ago..."), we know who best represents blue ("poor little Artoo"). But blue itself has many shades. 55:25 2005 My son is alive.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 14, 2019 9:49:06 GMT
Alex: "Let's just say that this looked more Star Wars than everything Disney has done so far with the franchise. It doesn't shy away from showing and using aliens (specifically classic aliens from the original saga), it takes advantage of what came before while showing new things." I've been trying to think of a place to mention a little something that came to me recently; ever since about RotJ, lucas has put something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue into his Star Wars films. *(IV is all new, so there's nothing old to put in it. And V doesn't really provide much opportunity for it). I remember Lucas saying once that he made it a point in the PT to have around 50% (?) OT aliens and 50% new aliens. Because it was important to carry home the idea that this is all the same galaxy. Something that was promptly ignored in the Disney sequels. Maybe it's for the best. It puts it further apart from the classic saga. I haven't seen "The Mandalorian", apart from some pre-release footage and a couple of trailers -- or one trailer? -- so I can't really comment on the show at present. It looks pretty well-made, and I wouldn't want to overly trash it in advance. That said, it probably won't be to my taste; and I did give it a bit of a pounding (at least, in passing) on Naboo News some months back. To be perfectly honest, little of Star Wars holds great appeal for me, outside of the saga films. Then again, this is an interesting and rather transitional (some might say phasic) time for Lucas' baby. All is open to change. Yeah, I didn't get the "Star Wars rush" from watching this. At the end of the day, it is a Boba Fett fan series (with their own Boba Fett wannabe) feeding on the western vibe (even though western is but one of the inspirations for Star Wars), and that prevents me from taking it seriously. And they don't hide the fact that they are monetizing from the Fett phenomenon. It's a pity. This could have perfectly worked without it. To be fair, without Lucas (and it didn't have to be considering his ST and Underworld series), dwelling with fringe characters is probably the type of stuff Disney should have focused on as far as Star Wars goes. Don't mess with the mythology, respect and follow the rules, play in the sandbox but without touching the big castle (the saga). Oh, and don't settle for mediocrity.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Nov 16, 2019 0:27:21 GMT
On the other hand, this is a blatant Jango/Boba Fett rip-off. And while they were not Mandalorians, they were bounty hunters with that visual image. Now we have a Mandalorian who is a bounty hunter. And every other Mandalorian had his own paint job, making them look even more like Boba Fett wannabes... One could almost get the idea that that armor equals bounty hunter... A big minus. Not sure what else were they supposed to do? I actually give LFL/Disney credit for not doing the easy thing, which would have been doing a Boba Fett series, which may have ruined the character for a lot of people, as seen with Luke, Leia and Han. If they are to create new content, they have to start somewhere familiar, somewhere that will make people want to watch. Are people going to want to watch a Star Wars show about a Mon Calamari Bounty Hunter? Let's not forget that this show is being over seen by Dave Filoni, who is responsible for a very large amount of the Mandalorian lore that is currently out there. Obviously he was instrumental in The Clone Wars (which had a large Manadalorian story line) as well as Rebels (again more Manadalorian story). So it's not like this show is just coming out of no where, and the main character here is just a rip off for the sake of a rip off. Also, let is not forget, that the whole reason why we get all the Mandalorian lore, even under Lucas, was because of Boba Fett's popularity among the fandom. We aren't getting Rodian Lore, or Hutt lore, etc etc. So one thing feeds the other. Fett's popularity feeds the Mandalorian stories, even Lucas realized this. So is the main character of this show a Mandalorian Bounty Hunter? Yes he is, but, obviously from the first show, there is more going on with him than just him cracking skulls, and collecting bounties. Where as the Fett's were just Bounty Hunters that wore Mandalorian armor, and that is all they were. Nothing else. And I tell ya, after the second chapter I watched today... man... I am all in! For me, it is very well written, and I was on the edge of my seat just waiting to see little baby "Yoda" make himself known. So I honestly don't get why it's OK for Lucas to create whole story lines built off the Boba Fett phenomenon. After all, the Mandalorians of The Clone Wars can all be looked at like Boba Fett Wannabees, even equipped with Jet Packs. Should there never be another Star Wars story about a young Jedi learning the ways of the force because the story might look like a Luke Skywalker wannabee? As critical as I have been of Disney Star Wars, I have to say, I am liking this show. Like I said in my first post, there are some eye rolling things that happen. Some plot devices of convenience, sure.. The Tracking FOBS, all the moisture vaporators etc etc. sure.. but if they keep the characters and story interesting, it's easy to look past those plot devices of convenience and similarities. After all, it's not like the Lucas era movies didn't have such things either (ahem, Anakin having a tracking beacon that told Obi Wan he wasn't on Naboo anymore).
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 16, 2019 15:27:39 GMT
Not sure what else were they supposed to do? I actually give LFL/Disney credit for not doing the easy thing, which would have been doing a Boba Fett series, which may have ruined the character for a lot of people, as seen with Luke, Leia and Han. If they are to create new content, they have to start somewhere familiar, somewhere that will make people want to watch. Are people going to want to watch a Star Wars show about a Mon Calamari Bounty Hunter? They could have done a show about a bounty hunter that isn't a Mandalorian. Or a Mandalorian that isn't a bounty hunter. Of all the bounty hunters George created, do you see two that are alike? No. The only two that are alike are Jango and Boba and that's justified by their connection, relationship and story. Let's not forget that this show is being over seen by Dave Filoni, who is responsible for a very large amount of the Mandalorian lore that is currently out there. Obviously he was instrumental in The Clone Wars (which had a large Manadalorian story line) as well as Rebels (again more Manadalorian story). So it's not like this show is just coming out of no where, and the main character here is just a rip off for the sake of a rip off. Also, let is not forget, that the whole reason why we get all the Mandalorian lore, even under Lucas, was because of Boba Fett's popularity among the fandom. We aren't getting Rodian Lore, or Hutt lore, etc etc. So one thing feeds the other. Fett's popularity feeds the Mandalorian stories, even Lucas realized this. The Mandalorians were created when the character of Boba Fett was being developed. His armor is salvaged and customized Mandalorian armor, but he wasn't a Mandalorian. Mandalorians were supercommandos from Mandalore (a militaristic and spartan society), Boba is neither. As further proof that one doesn't rely on the other, in TCW, Boba Fett and the Mandalorians have their own distinct and separate storylines. So is the main character of this show a Mandalorian Bounty Hunter? Yes he is, but, obviously from the first show, there is more going on with him than just him cracking skulls, and collecting bounties. Where as the Fett's were just Bounty Hunters that wore Mandalorian armor, and that is all they were. Nothing else. And I tell ya, after the second chapter I watched today... man... I am all in! For me, it is very well written, and I was on the edge of my seat just waiting to see little baby "Yoda" make himself known. I don't have a problem with him cracking skulls and collecting bounties. He's a bounty hunter. I don't have a problem with his character being developed, he is one. I have a problem with ripping off the Boba Fett concept for cheap publicity, that's all. So I honestly don't get why it's OK for Lucas to create whole story lines built off the Boba Fett phenomenon. After all, the Mandalorians of The Clone Wars can all be looked at like Boba Fett Wannabees, even equipped with Jet Packs. No, they didn't. Filoni made it clear how George envisions them, and they are very distinct from Boba Fett or the EU interpretations. As he said so himself: Ironically, that was all ignored for The Mandalorian: - Vagabond; - Customized armor; - Bounty hunter; Should there never be another Star Wars story about a young Jedi learning the ways of the force because the story might look like a Luke Skywalker wannabee? The story would only look like Luke's if they want to, not because it's about a young boy learning the ways of the Jedi. That's a premiss that all Jedi share since it's part of their ways. As critical as I have been of Disney Star Wars, I have to say, I am liking this show. Like I said in my first post, there are some eye rolling things that happen. Some plot devices of convenience, sure.. The Tracking FOBS, all the moisture vaporators etc etc. sure.. but if they keep the characters and story interesting, it's easy to look past those plot devices of convenience and similarities. After all, it's not like the Lucas era movies didn't have such things either (ahem, Anakin having a tracking beacon that told Obi Wan he wasn't on Naboo anymore). I never said the show is bad. It's not. Even though it's not saying much, it's miles better than everything Disney has done with the franchise put together. But I have issues with it, and I think the issues could have been avoided, specially when Filoni (who knows better) is involved.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Nov 17, 2019 11:52:01 GMT
There is something I don't understand. Is this part of the new cannon: I mean Jango/Boba not being Mandalorians? If so, then Disney cornered themself with this. I honestly always considered Jango as real Mandalorian who became bounty hunter later for I don't know what reasons. But I don't see how making Jango a non Mandalorian helps "making a good impression" about this planet. The Mandalorians are fierce warroirs that's why they become good bounty hunters altough this is ahem, complicated profession.
Many thanks for Mike for making this review. Disney + is too far away from my country now and I cannot watch the show.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 17, 2019 12:54:02 GMT
There is something I don't understand. Is this part of the new cannon: I mean Jango/Boba not being Mandalorians? If so, then Disney cornered themself with this. I honestly always considered Jango as real Mandalorian who became bounty hunter later for I don't know what reasons. But I don't see how making Jango a non Mandalorian helps "making a good impression" about this planet. Jango not being a Mandalorian is something that came directly from George Lucas and ended up being established years ago in The Clone Wars. From his inception, he never saw him (or Boba) as a Mandalorian. Jango being a good warrior doesn't mean he was a Mandalorian either, since being a good warrior is not something exclusive to Mandalorians. Jango was simply a bounty hunter who wore salvaged Mandalorian armor. This goes all the way back to the development of Boba Fett and the concept of being a bounty hunter, in the sense that he picked and refurbished stuff along the way. Hence the attachments and modifications, Wookiee fur, etc... Mandalorian armor hapened to be one of those things. It would be like calling Grievous a Jedi just because he had lightsabers. He has lightsabers because he killed Jedi and collected their weapons, not because he was one. Jango/Boba had Mandalorian armor because they salvaged it, not because they were Mandalorians.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Nov 17, 2019 14:31:01 GMT
No, it is not. Is all the opposite: even if the Mandalorians don't specialize in bounty hunting, this especially does. And why not? As I said every good warroir would become great boutny hunter with the specific of the morale of course. Is not that is obligatory, is possible.
If you show the Madalorian to someone who is not hardcore SW fan he/she would say: same armor, same profession so is like Boba Fett. He even has the Boba Fett "gun". This association is absolutely inevitable. Yes, not everyone who has lightsaber and Jedi clothes is a Jedi (although Griveous never wore Jedi uniform and although TC14 from the Phantom Menace recognized Obi Wan and Qui Gon exactly by their "uniform" ) but the Jedi are also Force sensitive which is their dinstictive quality and it cannot be associated with Grievous. Anyway, the Mandalorian armor is too peculiar and long associated with Jango and Boba and except if someone is not a TCW fan is inevitable to associate Boba/Jango with every other Mandalorian. I personally made it every time I saw Sabine in Rebels. Anyway, I think is Filoni's "fault" to make this character of the show as he is as Filoni is the great Madalorian fan regarding to today's Lucasfilm.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 17, 2019 21:52:24 GMT
No, it is not. Is all the opposite: even if the Mandalorians don't specialize in bounty hunting, this especially does. And why not? As I said every good warroir would become great boutny hunter with the specific of the morale of course. Is not that is obligatory, is possible. Nobody said that it's not possible for a Mandalorian to become a bounty hunter. It's possible. Just like it's possible for a Mandalorian to be a mercenary, or even to see those two professions as lesser or unbefitting to a proud warrior race. Anything is possible as long as a logical explanation is provided. If you show the Madalorian to someone who is not hardcore SW fan he/she would say: same armor, same profession so is like Boba Fett. He even has the Boba Fett "gun". This association is absolutely inevitable. That's correct, which is one of my criticisms as I've stated on this very thread. Yes, not everyone who has lightsaber and Jedi clothes is a Jedi (although Griveous never wore Jedi uniform and although TC14 from the Phantom Menace recognized Obi Wan and Qui Gon exactly by their "uniform" ) but the Jedi are also Force sensitive which is their dinstictive quality and it cannot be associated with Grievous. You're missing my point. Grievous and the Jedi share commonalities, but one can't extrapolate that commonality and pretend they are one and the same. It's the same case with Jango/Boba and the Mandalorians. Just because they wear Mandalorian armor, it doesn't make them Mandalorians. The Mandalorians, at least as George established, are different from Jango/Boba. Unlike them, they are not bounty hunters but a warrior race of supercommandos.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Nov 21, 2019 15:39:06 GMT
They could have done a show about a bounty hunter that isn't a Mandalorian. Or a Mandalorian that isn't a bounty hunter. Of all the bounty hunters George created, do you see two that are alike? No. The only two that are alike are Jango and Boba and that's justified by their connection, relationship and story. With that thinking, Jango should not have been a Bounty Hunter either, because all Jango is now is a rip off of Boba Fett's popularity. If you are going to complain about not being original enough, than that complaint should definitely file right down onto Jango. He could have been anything other than a Bounty Hunter. And again, as I have already said once, the entire reason we have Mandalorians at all is because of Fett's popularity in the fandom and Lucas decided that was enough to develop a pretty extensive story for them in The Clone Wars, the entire Mandalorian story is a rip off of Boba Fett. By Lucas's own admission we can conclude that Yoda was a rip off of Obi Wan because Lucas killed off the mentor in ANH, and now needed for ESB. Thus enter the old Jedi Master, in seclusion, that is going to teach Luke the ways of the Force, only to have something happen that cuts Luke's training short... I just think the complaint of the main character being too derivative is ignoring the fact that even Lucas saw fit to base an entire culture and planet on a character that had less than 5 minutes of screen time in 3 movies, solely because he had bad ass armor. It is not some stretch that there were Mandalorian Bounty Hunters out in the galaxy doing their own thing, while the events of the characters we know were doing their thing. I much prefer to follow a character that already has a history that I know thru the exploration of his planet and culture in other aspects of Star Wars lore. As I said before, following a Mon Calamari Bounty Hunter is not really up to snuff, or following a Mandalorian Accountant is really not my cup of tea either. The Mandalorians were created when the character of Boba Fett was being developed. His armor is salvaged and customized Mandalorian armor, but he wasn't a Mandalorian. Mandalorians were supercommandos from Mandalore (a militaristic and spartan society), Boba is neither. As further proof that one doesn't rely on the other, in TCW, Boba Fett and the Mandalorians have their own distinct and separate storylines. How the Mandalorians came to be as a Lucas concept is very much in the air. I know some sources tie Boba Fett's conception to actually being a Mandalorian, however, the problem with that is there are also sources, even from Lucas himself, where Fett was conceptualized as a rogue Stormtrooper, or super commando stormtrooper, hence his initial concepts are with all white armor. This attachment to the Stormtroopers is talked about by Lucas in the AOTC DVD Commentary where he says something along the lines that he always felt that Fett was related to the stormtroopers, so that is why he made Jango the source material for the clone troopers, who eventually become the stormtroopers. Boba, by being his fathers genetic rip-off, is now related directly to the stormtroopers in Star Wars lore. I never said Boba and the Mandalorians were the same. However, it is clear, once again, that an entire story line of a TV show for a planet and culture, books, merchandising,etc etc have been built around Boba Fett's armor. So to me it is a bit, curious, that there would be a problem with a Mandalorian Bounty Hunter, when so much other stuff has been built around Boba Fett's popularity and ripped off from him, only for there to be a problem now. We can argue the semantics of what came first, the chicken or the egg, but what should be clear is if Boba Fett does not get the cult following he did from ESB and ROTJ, than there is a good chance that Boba is not in AOTC, and the Mandalorian storyline of The Clone Wars does not get made. I don't have a problem with him cracking skulls and collecting bounties. He's a bounty hunter. I don't have a problem with his character being developed, he is one. I have a problem with ripping off the Boba Fett concept for cheap publicity, that's all. I wouldn't call creating an entire show around a character, cheap publicity. However, if you are going down that road, than again, we have a large chunk of story that was over seen by Lucas in which is clearly built of the popularity of Boba Fett and nothing more. Was it cheap publicity for Lucas to do it was well? Filoni made it clear how George envisions them, and they are very distinct from Boba Fett or the EU interpretations. As he said so himself: Ironically, that was all ignored for The Mandalorian: - Vagabond; - Customized armor; - Bounty hunter; And if you watched the show closely, at least so far, you will realize that the Mandalorian is not customizing his true Mandalorian armor. The cheap knock off armor is customized with colors. It's clear, in the first episode, the Mandalorian's helmet is the only piece of true mandalorian armor. The rest seems to be junk, made to look like Mandalorain armor. When he gets the new piece, the pauldron, he doesn't customize it. It goes straight on as the same in the same raw color scheme as his helmet, raw silver. Now, I believe he will eventually customize it. I feel this way because the armorsmith asks if his insignia has been revealed yet. I am willing to bet this means his clan, which if he finds out which clan he belonged too, he will eventually take that clans colors or insignia. For Filonis quote, there was uniformity in the Mandalorians in the Clone Wars show, but there was also customization in the armor as well. Go back and look, helmets had different colors and designs on them. One group had different colors than another group. As Filoni says in your quote, they are "trying to regain" their history, that's because they've been scattered across the galaxy, that's why there is infighting among the Mandalorians in the show. One group wanted peace and prosperity, another wanted revenge and a return to the old warrior ways of Mandalore. I'm pretty sure that's what we are seeing in the current show. It seems in this current show the Mandalorians are still not united. They are still in disarray across the galaxy, trying to find their "mythology". In fact the quote you provided sounds very similar to what we have seen in the first two episodes, except it is boiled down to 1 specific Mandalorian who is trying to figure out who he is. And lastly, Here is Filoni's full quote... which the first sentence you curiously left off... Were they mercenary people? Yes, absolutely they were!! Mercenaries... like you know, Bounty Hunters.... So the Mandalorian in the show is not really not far beyond what was portrayed under what Lucas said to Filoni. Filoni's quote is a rough history of the Mandalorians. Their history of being warriors, mercernaries, conquerers. All that war and fighting led them to fight the Jedi, which in turn caused the cataclysm. Now, just as Filoni says, the Mandaloarins are trying to find their mythology. For this specific Mandalorian we are following in the show, he is a mercenary in the form of a Bounty Hunter, who is trying to connect to who he is through his peoples customary armor that he is slowly piecing together. Is he Boba Fett? No. He is much more. But you are getting stuck on a couple similar aspects of the characters, ignoring the actual show so far in what we have seen, and ignoring everything that even Lucas himself built off the popularity of Boba Fett.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Nov 22, 2019 10:29:02 GMT
With that thinking, Jango should not have been a Bounty Hunter either, because all Jango is now is a rip off of Boba Fett's popularity. No, not at all. Jango is directly tied to Boba, it's part of the same story. The son followed the father. Like I said before: Of all the bounty hunters George created, do you see two that are alike? No. The only two that are alike are Jango and Boba and that's justified by their connection, relationship and story. If you are going to complain about not being original enough, My complaint is that this is a Boba Fett wannabe without any justification for it. It's following the old EU idea of the Mandalorians that don't reflect Lucas' intentions at all. By Lucas's own admission we can conclude that Yoda was a rip off of Obi Wan because Lucas killed off the mentor in ANH, and now needed for ESB. Thus enter the old Jedi Master, in seclusion, that is going to teach Luke the ways of the Force, only to have something happen that cuts Luke's training short... That's a big strawman. If a Jedi Master were to exist in the Empire era, it would invariably have to be in hiding and as a Jedi, he would have the ability to teach someone. That's not a rip off. That's a logical result of the established conditions, not a rip-off. I just think the complaint of the main character being too derivative is ignoring the fact that even Lucas saw fit to base an entire culture and planet on a character that had less than 5 minutes of screen time in 3 movies, solely because he had bad ass armor. It is not some stretch that there were Mandalorian Bounty Hunters out in the galaxy doing their own thing, while the events of the characters we know were doing their thing. No, it's the other way around. Boba's armor was associated with the Mandalorians. Boba wore Mandalorian armor. Not some random one. I much prefer to follow a character that already has a history that I know thru the exploration of his planet and culture in other aspects of Star Wars lore. As I said before, following a Mon Calamari Bounty Hunter is not really up to snuff, or following a Mandalorian Accountant is really not my cup of tea either. You could follow a Mandalorian supercommando, which is what Mandalorians are. But I guess it's easier to rip off Boba Fett, except this time with an actual Mandalorian instead. How the Mandalorians came to be as a Lucas concept is very much in the air. Not really. It has been confirmed to have come from him. I know some sources tie Boba Fett's conception to actually being a Mandalorian, however, the problem with that is there are also sources, even from Lucas himself, where Fett was conceptualized as a rogue Stormtrooper, or super commando stormtrooper, hence his initial concepts are with all white armor. This attachment to the Stormtroopers is talked about by Lucas in the AOTC DVD Commentary where he says something along the lines that he always felt that Fett was related to the stormtroopers, so that is why he made Jango the source material for the clone troopers, who eventually become the stormtroopers. Boba, by being his fathers genetic rip-off, is now related directly to the stormtroopers in Star Wars lore. That the character of Boba Fett evolved in its concept phase in no way means that Mandalorians didn't come from George. Boba Fett was initially conceived as a supercommando (a stormtrooper template). He was later turned into a bounty hunter, but the supercommando armor remained. When George decided to explore the origins of the stormtroopers/clone troopers, he returned to the original idea of Boba being related to it. Only this time, through his father: Jango Fett. But Jango, like Boba, were not supercommandos to whom the armor they wore belonged. They were bounty hunters. And like the bounty hunters in the old westerns, they salvaged and picked stuff along the way. I never said Boba and the Mandalorians were the same. However, it is clear, once again, that an entire story line of a TV show for a planet and culture, books, merchandising,etc etc have been built around Boba Fett's armor. And to George, Boba Fett's armor has always been salvaged and customized Mandalorian armor. So to me it is a bit, curious, that there would be a problem with a Mandalorian Bounty Hunter, when so much other stuff has been built around Boba Fett's popularity and ripped off from him, only for there to be a problem now. Who said it wasn't a problem to me before that? I was glad when in TCW, thanks to George, the whole Boba Fett fan club that were the Mandalorians was completely ignored. I wouldn't call creating an entire show around a character, cheap publicity. However, if you are going down that road, than again, we have a large chunk of story that was over seen by Lucas in which is clearly built of the popularity of Boba Fett and nothing more. Was it cheap publicity for Lucas to do it was well? No, because Lucas never did any of that. The Mandalorians were their own culture, completely unrelated to Boba Fett. The opposite of what Licensing did. For Filonis quote, there was uniformity in the Mandalorians in the Clone Wars show, but there was also customization in the armor as well. Go back and look, helmets had different colors and designs on them. One group had different colors than another group. As Filoni says in your quote, they are "trying to regain" their history, that's because they've been scattered across the galaxy, that's why there is infighting among the Mandalorians in the show. One group wanted peace and prosperity, another wanted revenge and a return to the old warrior ways of Mandalore. In TCW, there was no different colors and designs per group. They were all the same: dark blue and grey. Standardized. And lastly, Here is Filoni's full quote... which the first sentence you curiously left off... I can satisfy that curiosity: the second part that you quoted is completely unrelated to Lucas. It's simply Filoni attempting to tie things up with the EU and its fandom, something that at the time he was attacked for many times. A time when people kept ignoring that Lucas never saw the EU as part of his universe and TCW, being an extension of his, was never bound to EU lore. But you are getting stuck on a couple similar aspects of the characters, ignoring the actual show so far in what we have seen, and ignoring everything that even Lucas himself built off the popularity of Boba Fett. What exactly am I ignoring? Lucas didn't built anything off Boba's popularity. Boba's character, and armor, was built off of concepts that existed in Lucas' head and that he cared enough to inform the concept artists when designing Boba. Something he cared enough to explore decades later in TCW.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Nov 24, 2019 11:52:08 GMT
Forget The Mandalorian, I want to watch The Midichlorians.
And in that vein, and to continue with Cryo's music posts (as he & I often do): I sometimes see people say TPM can be excluded from SW Saga viewings. Well, I think I found a good analogy to help illustrate why it's crucial. It would be similar to The Beatles leaving out the opening bars to If I Fell.
There's even a vital connection to all this with Elvis, Cryo.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Dec 9, 2019 22:57:18 GMT
We are just going around in circles at this point, so I will only respond to this last point of yours and than I will just have to agree to disagree.. As I have said many times, there is only one reason, and one reason only, as to why we are even having this discussion on Mandalorians, that is because of the popularity of Boba Fett. That is all, period, end of story. Lucas's ideas of what is or isn't a Mandalorian and when he thought of them is really irrelevant, because even he recognized that the fans, we the fans, were in love with Boba Fett, and his armor. If that love of Boba Fett as a character in the OT never transpired, than there is nothing that would give Lucas any kind of inspiration to include Boba in AOTC, or to work with Filoni on TCW for the episodes that included Mandalorians. It is a fact that because of the popularity of Boba Fett, that his story, and any story that Lucas may or may not have thought of as part of his back story has stayed in Lucas's thoughts. Lucas has had hundreds, thousands, of different ideas and backstories for all kinds of characters, and beings, and cultures, and planets... but.. Mandalorians, wearing the same armor of a fan favorite character just so happens is the one that Lucas gives the green light too on TCW? It's not hard to believe that because of the fandoms fascination with Boba Fett, that anything that was a part of his story, was always in the back of Lucas's mind. Lucas was constantly giving the green light for the constant Boba Fett stories in the EU, he had to give the green light for the story in the EU (now legends) that allowed Boba to live. Lucas, when he still owned LFL, wanted the video game 1313 to heavily revolve around Boba Fett. Lucas at one point thought about adding a scene to ROTJ which saw Fett crawling out of the Sarlacc. So when Lucas gives Dave Filoni the green light to do episodes about Mandalore and Mandalorians, it is pretty easy to follow the logic that this all is built off of Fett's popularity, that is what you are ignoring... If there is no fascination with Boba Fett, if the fandom looks at him as just another background character, than I feel pretty confident in saying that any kind of Mandalorian story in the Star Wars universe is never made. EDIT: The forums are being a bit uncooperative.. this is the point you made that I was responding too: What exactly am I ignoring? Lucas didn't built anything off Boba's popularity. Boba's character, and armor, was built off of concepts that existed in Lucas' head and that he cared enough to inform the concept artists when designing Boba. Something he cared enough to explore decades later in TCW.
|
|
|
Post by Seeker of the Whills on Jan 1, 2022 20:59:29 GMT
I wasn't interested in this show because the main character seemed like such a bland copy of Boba/Jango, and I was never a big fan of the Mandalorian aspect of Star Wars lore. I decided to check out Book of Boba Fett because I'm at least a little invested in Boba's character, and I was surprised to like it quite a bit, enough to make me take a look at The Mandalorian. This show is the best thing to come out of Disney Star Wars. By far. I like that it feels like Rogue One and Solo, which in turn feel closer to Lucas' Star Wars, than the sequel trilogy. There is a difference, though. Lucas' Star Wars has a mythic quality and a theatricality, which feels like you're reading a fairy tale or indeed the Journal of the Whills. You're witnessing these epic, mythological events transpire over generations. The Mandalorian feels like an ordinary day in the galaxy far, far away. There's a heightened realism. One of the aspects that Lucas talks about in his films is that you're dropped straight into an environment that you don't fully understand and that isn't explained. The Mandalorian, on the other hand, explains every nook and cranny of the world. There is a lot of detail, a lot of which is added for fan service, which can be cool. But I like Lucas' approach, which leaves an air of mystery and magic about the world. The Mandalorian is very matter-of-fact about everything. So there is a little bit of demystification.
One of the feats this show achieved with me, one that I never thought would happen, is it got me to like Ahsoka Tano. I never liked her in the animated shows. I thought it was mostly the voice which I didn't like, and that was confirmed by The Mandalorian. Rosario Dawson is much better as Ahsoka than Ashley Eckstein. Her voice always sounded smug and grating to me. Seeing her in live action, I actually feel like she could have been the padawan of Anakin as played by Hayden Christensen. It would be cool to see a flashback of them together, perhaps in the upcoming Ahsoka show. Can't believe I'm looking forward to that one now.
|
|
|
Post by smittysgelato on Jan 1, 2022 23:09:01 GMT
You're right. The fairy tale aspect kinda isn't there (or is at least de-emphasized) because it seems a lot of fans see Star Wars as only a space western, which this show does very well. I think it is fine in that different tv shows can explore different aspects of what Star Wars can be. However, in my mind, Star Wars is more than just a space western, that is only one aspect of it. Star Wars gets flattened when you decide to focus on only one aspect of it.
This is why The Clone Wars is still my favourite Star Wars TV series, because it captures all of the genres that comprise Star Wars.
However, all of that being said, I think The Mandalorian nails the primary themes of Star Wars very well (confronting fear, fathers & sons, compassion, etc.)
|
|
|
Post by Seeker of the Whills on Jan 4, 2022 15:45:32 GMT
The Mandalorian totally gets the Star Wars universe, and its major themes for the most part. What I think it shares a bit with the Disney movies, is its lack of more contemplative moments and wise characters, which are a staple of Lucas' Star Wars. I think the Disney movies totally lack these things. There's a lot of moving around and action and shouting in those movies (thankfully Mando is mostly silent so no "WHOOPING" in the show). Maz Kanata was meant to be the new Yoda, but turned out to be a joke. The Mandalorian had the Ugnaught character, and Ahsoka, which were great, yet there could have been more of them. Ahsoka's presence reminded me of that of Qui-Gon, my second favorite Star Wars character, which made me fall in love with her in this show. And then of course you had the brief yet impactful appearance of Luke, who just oozes cool and wisdom. I would like more of that sort of thing. I get that Mando is a space western, and shoot outs are to be expected, but the action scenes got a bit repetitive after a while. When you've once seen him take out stormtroopers with reckless abandon, you've seen them all.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Feb 1, 2023 0:49:07 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2023 16:02:12 GMT
|
|