Post by Seeker of the Whills on Nov 20, 2022 18:34:45 GMT
That's very nice of you to say, Cryo. I do try to add something. The five year anniversary as well as the recent Rian Johnson interview got me to think about this movie again, and the whole development of the sequel trilogy has been on my mind recently. To me it's an interesting topic.
I was outright negative on TLJ on release like I was on TFA, but I could at least appreciate some of the prequel-esque moments more. I've since softened up on the movie, and now enjoy it mostly due to aesthetic reasons. TFA is the one Star Wars movie I still have a difficult relationship with, and I sometimes give it a hard time like in that post. But even TFA I can enjoy as a sort of rollercoaster ride if I remove it from the larger context of the rest of the saga.
I was going over familiar ground, but that post was really meant as a prelude to another post in The Rise of Skywalker thread. TRoS hasn't been picked apart quite as much as TLJ, though you have made many excellent posts on it, so maybe I could tap into something more original with it.
I really like the Rey-Kylo connection, especially as presented in TLJ. It created a cool new ability that added to the repertoire of the Force, and it was done purely through editing, which is very Lucasian. It was a similarly bold choice as the "Padmé's ruminations" scene in RotS. I feel like Johnson extrapolated it from there. I see the Anakin-Padmé connection as the precursor to the whole dyad between Rey and Kylo. As Padmé dies, Anakin is reborn. I also see a dyad between Anakin and Obi-Wan. As Anakin is reborn, Obi-Wan dies and is reborn as Ben.
I was also thinking that there was a push-pull tension between Abrams and Johnson's movies. I think that still somewhat exists in TRoS, which in some ways responded to TLJ by restoring things from TFA, like Kylo's mask and the Knights of Ren, etc. But to me, TRoS was the anchor that grounded the ST in the rest of the saga. Snoke was just a clone puppeteered by Palpatine, and the First Order, including the Knights of Ren, were just a front for the Sith who were behind everything since the beginning. After TLJ pulled the veil on all the empty "mystery boxes" from TFA, TRoS then revealed that it all connected to Lucas' saga in the end. A bit last minute, but I liked it.
The funny thing is that Rian has Luke Force Project with Anakin's lightsaber...So, was Rian really rejecting the lightsaber and what it represented in the end? Or is Luke projecting with the lightsaber simply because that is what the immature Kylo Ren expects? The fact that Luke says, "I will not be the Last Jedi" seems to indicate Rian isn't really rejecting the lightsaber.
I walked out of the theatre the first time confused as to what Rian was going for, and am still kinda confused.
My reading of that is that Rian was rejecting just the fetishized image of the saber seen in TFA, not what it meant in Lucas' saga. Anakin's saber was never really that special in Lucas' films, it was just a lightsaber. Yes, it's an important passing of the baton when Obi-Wan gives it to Luke in ANH, but it wasn't the sort of be-all and end-all item that could trigger visions like it was in TFA. Luke just builds a new lightsaber after losing it, which is in contrast to Rey having rebuilt the saber in TRoS, which is again Abrams kind of clinging to the past. I wish Rey had the new yellow saber right from the beginning in TRoS and fought Palpatine with it. That would've been cool.
Granted, I haven't said a great deal, either, but my attitude on this is: at least get involved before bitching.
"It's all a machine, partner. Live free, don't join."
...Seeker, if you seek a possible metaphorical, uber-ironic dig from Johnson...
That is the kind of line I'm seeking. To me, these meta lines seem to be targeted at TFA and Disney, not Lucas' saga. A lot of people have thought that TLJ is irreverent towards Star Wars as a whole, but I don't think so. I think it's making commentary on the state of Disney's Star Wars specifically.