|
Post by emperorferus on Jan 20, 2020 3:34:24 GMT
He’s an interesting character in my opinion. I notice that he is the subject to a lot of debate.
I still wonder how sincere he was in AOTC when he spoke about Qui-Gon, or when he asked Obi-Wan to join him.
I always thought he was intentionally trying to plant mistrust in the Republic into Obi-Wan by mentioning Darth Sidious, but on the other hand, by all appearances he seemed to expect Obi-Wan to die (unless he and/or Sidious expected them to be rescued somehow).
The degree of his personal loyalty to Sidious has varied in different sources from what I’ve seen, including The Clone Wars series.
|
|
|
Dooku
Jan 20, 2020 4:20:51 GMT
via mobile
jppiper likes this
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jan 20, 2020 4:20:51 GMT
In regard to Dooku outright telling the truth to Obi-Wan about Darth Sidious controlling the Senate, it reminds me of the real world occult practitioners hiding things in plain sight, whether it be symbols being disguised as corporate logos, or news stories being published but buried in fluff pieces or relegated to the text crawl at the bottom of the screen. This kind of trick seems very much in line with the character of an elitist like Dooku. You could take it as Dooku rubbing the truth in the faces of the Jedi, or as a way of gaining the karmic permission from the Jedi to create the Evil Empire.
I'm currently listening to the Dooku audiobook so if I have anything to add here, I will.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Jan 20, 2020 4:56:31 GMT
His sincerity is purely selfish.
In the above scene Dooku is using Obi Wan's ignorance of the Sith as a hook to try and get Obi Wan to join him.
Let's not forget, Dooku is a Sith Lord. He is the apprentice. Dooku is trying to recruit a very powerful Jedi in the hopes that this powerful Jedi, Obi Wan, will turn to the Dark Side and help Dooku kill Sidious, thus making Dooku the master.
Dooku obviously knows that Obi Wan is ignorant to him (Dooku) being a Sith Lord, so Dooku tries to pass off his Separatist movement as a means to combat the Sith, when in fact Dooku is a Sith, looking to become more powerful, and looking to consolidate his own power with the help of Obi Wan.
If we step outside of the movie, and break down the scene as written, we see the message that Lucas is trying to send here, and that message is that Dooku is a liar and cannot be trusted for anything he says.
Dooku says Obi Wan's imprisonment is a mistake, when we know it is not a mistake. Dooku tries to play off that he is merely a delegate of some sort, that has to peitition for Obi Wan's freedom. We know, as Obi Wan does, that Dooku is the leader, as Obi Wan overheard the conversations between the Separatists, something that Dooku does not know happened.
Dooku lies about there being a Bounty Hunter on Geonosis. At the end of the movie, we find out that Dooku is Darth Tyranus, and Tyranus hired Jango. So in all likelihood, the moment Jango set foot on Geonosis, Dooku knew he was there.
So in the first few sentences of the interactions between Dooku and Obi Wan, we know Dooku is a liar. Once, at the end of the movie, we find out that Dooku is a Sith, we can now re-contextualize what he says to Obi Wan. Dooku is not trying to destroy the Sith, he is a Sith. He is looking to destroy Sidious, and become the master, as the Sith are want to do all the time. As we see over 20 years later when Vader tries to seduce Luke to help destroy Palpatine under the promise of bringing peace to the galaxy.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Jan 21, 2020 2:27:11 GMT
The most overlooked villain in Star Wars, to date. I'm a big fan of the character.
He is still being honest. He's essentially giving away the secret behind the magic trick, and for that, despite being a Sith Lord, I have a lot of sympathy for him, much like I did for a more well known Sith Lord when he killed Darth Sidious. Was Vader really just trying to overthrow his master? Was there any sincerity in what he did on the Second Death Star? I would say there was, but you can find people who say not.
It's tragic that it went over Obi-Wan's head. I don't blame him for rebuking Tyranus while in captivity, but he really should have followed up on the tip more sooner. Would it have made a difference, you might say? Well, in that hypothetical one must first accept the premise that the Republic was not doomed to failure when Palpatine first became a Senator. But would it? That's the key question: would a discussion with the heads of the Jedi Council on this theory immediately in 22 BBY have made an impact? I'm inclined to say no. The Clone War begins a mere few hours after his capture on Geonosis, which has the profound effect of completely disorientating the Jedi Order, from which they'll never recover. The time for these investigations was, regrettably, gone.
A lot of the discourse in recent years has centred around the Jedi Order's culpability in the emergence of a Sith dictatorship. I don't disagree - as a quasi special police force tasked with keeping the galaxy safe they have no right to blame the victim card. What's spoken of barely at all though, and which even the long running animation didn't cover, is the role of the galactic public. There are a lot of corrupt politicians in the senate precisely because they were voted in by these people, and it is not acknowledged enough. Palpatine is so beloved by the Republican's citizens that Yoda - an altruistic bureaucrat at the Jedi department - can't afford to intervene, least he damage his institution's reputation. Never mind Obi-Wan Kenobi!
All that said, Dooku is not murdered - he is executed. And he is so on the orders of the Republic, which is also, quite neatly, a Sith betrayal. It's difficult to have too much sympathy for him, especially once you watch The Clone Wars and realise how involved he was in the daily operations of the CIS forces, but I cannot forget how he gave away the whole trick to Obi-Wan on Geonosis. It's probably my favourite scene in Attack of the Clones.
Remember though:
One man's separatists is another man's independentists (aka freedom fighters)
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jan 21, 2020 11:20:42 GMT
I like Dooku a lot. I like his character motivations, I like that he was portrayed by the great Christopher Lee and I like his demeanor and style. I also always liked how Christopher Lee spoke of the character. It shows how much he cared about it all. He is still being honest. Mixing truth with lies, which invariably results in lies, is not a sign of honesty. Dooku was being deceitful on purpose. He's essentially giving away the secret behind the magic trick, and for that, despite being a Sith Lord, I have a lot of sympathy for him, much like I did for a more well known Sith Lord when he killed Darth Sidious. Was Vader really just trying to overthrow his master? Was there any sincerity in what he did on the Second Death Star? I would say there was, but you can find people who say not. Wait, there are people who don't believe in Vader's sacrifice in ROTJ? It's tragic that it went over Obi-Wan's head. I don't blame him for rebuking Tyranus while in captivity, but he really should have followed up on the tip more sooner. But in the end, even if they don't fully believe in what Dooku, the Jedi still decide to keep a closer eye on the senate anyway. And throughout ROTS it's established that they had been looking for the Sith Lord.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Jan 21, 2020 13:45:16 GMT
He's one of my favorite characters too.
Unless I'm forgetting something, I feel his loyalty to Sidious in the cartoon is portrayed much like in the films. Even when ordered to kill Asajj Ventress.
The more recent novel Master And Apprentice focuses quite a bit on Qui-Gon's memories of his training with Dooku which is quite good.
I did not like his portrayal in The Dark Rendezvous novel, which had him conflicted over many things including his allegiance to Sidious and the Sith. I think a central point of his character is that he is not.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jan 21, 2020 17:10:39 GMT
I do not think "sincere" applies to Dooku as sincere means telling the truth with pure heart and thoughts and is the last thing Dooku does.
First when Dooku tells the truth to Obi Wan (the truth about Sidious) he "incidentally" forgets to tell that Sidious is indeed his master. So, yeah, Sidious controls the Senate and Dooku really wants to destroy him bit only to take his place as every other Sith would try in his position. (Not to mention that probably Dooku even then knows the true identity of Sidious but hey that are insignificant details!) The most effective way to gain someone trust for something very doubtful is not to lie him but to tell him part of the truth.
Does Dooku truly believes that Qui Gon would join him? As Separatist leader yes, he does. He has no illusions I think that Qui Go would go against the Jedi Code (at least not at first) but against the corrupted Republic, that is completely different matter. I honestly don't know what Qui Gon would do if he was alive at that point speaking about his connection to the Separatist movement and the Clone Wars but obviously he would try to negotiate something. Qui Gon is not a fan of the let's say it standard decisions, but I don't think that he would go straight against the Republic although Dooku thinks that.
|
|
|
Dooku
Jan 21, 2020 18:46:25 GMT
via mobile
jppiper likes this
Post by emperorferus on Jan 21, 2020 18:46:25 GMT
I do not think "sincere" applies to Dooku as sincere means telling the truth with pure heart and thoughts and is the last thing Dooku does. First when Dooku tells the truth to Obi Wan (the truth about Sidious) he "incidentally" forgets to tell that Sidious is indeed his master. So, yeah, Sidious controls the Senate and Dooku really wants to destroy him bit only to take his place as every other Sith would try in his position. (Not to mention that probably Dooku even then knows the true identity of Sidious but hey that are insignificant details!) The most effective way to gain someone trust for something very doubtful is not to lie him but to tell him part of the truth. Does Dooku truly believes that Qui Gon would join him? As Separatist leader yes, he does. He has no illusions I think that Qui Go would go against the Jedi Code (at least not at first) but against the corrupted Republic, that is completely different matter. I honestly don't know what Qui Gon would do if he was alive at that point speaking about his connection to the Separatist movement and the Clone Wars but obviously he would try to negotiate something. Qui Gon is not a fan of the let's say it standard decisions, but I don't think that he would go straight against the Republic although Dooku thinks that. This also raises the question of how personally Dooku and Qui-Gon knew each other, particularly after Qui-Gon became a Knight and Master. Obi-Wan never met him, which suggests that they did not talk often, but Dooku’s line in AOTC suggests that they spoke at least once after Obi-Wan became Qui-Gon’s Padawan. Makes me wonder whether Dooku really knew whether Qui-Gon would have agreed with the Separatist cause or was using that as rhetoric. I cannot speak for any Disney sources that shed light on the matter, but I saw different interpretations from prior EU works.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jan 21, 2020 18:46:36 GMT
I don't think Qui-Gon would join him. Like Dooku said, Qui-Gon was aware of the corruption within the Republic. What he says is that Qui-Gon would join him if he knew the truth (that a Sith Lord controls the Republic), but Dooku is not only a Sith Lord himself but also the apprentice to the Sith Lord that controls the Republic, so Dooku is lying one way or the other about what Qui-Gon would do. Unless I'm forgetting something, I feel his loyalty to Sidious in the cartoon is portrayed much like in the films. Even when ordered to kill Asajj Ventress. It is. He serves Sidious, but always aims (in secret) to take his place with an apprentice of his own.
|
|
|
Dooku
Jan 21, 2020 19:09:10 GMT
via mobile
jppiper likes this
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jan 21, 2020 19:09:10 GMT
This surface level in-universe discussion is nice and relaxing, good for make-believe and escapism, and I'll add to that dimension when I'm done listening to the Jedi Lost audiobook, but what do you guys think Lucas was trying to tell us with this character? He obviously doesn't exist to look cool on the poster and sell action figures, like Darth Mall.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Jan 21, 2020 19:18:05 GMT
Mixing truth with lies, which invariably results in lies, is not a sign of honesty. Dooku was being deceitful on purpose.
Telling the truth, even if the motive behind it is not so benign is, nonetheless, still truthful. He's clearly doing this in the interest of accumulating greater power, yet it's also somewhat of a warning shot to the Jedi who are - like governments and regulators in the run up to the global financial crisis - asleep at the wheel. In the end, of course, it's no good.
If a whistle-blower comes to me tomorrow morning to tell me about some secret nefarious act being carried out in China, I will still value that, even if I know his real goal is to topple Xi and take control of the CCP for himself. I'm not going to deem him righteous, nor hold his hand, but I will investigate his claim because I believe it can be redirected towards the wellbeing of the world itself. I too will - technically speaking - be deceitful in that I will gain the whistle-blower's confidence in purporting this to be all about one corrupt leader, when in reality I want to bring down a fundamentally unfixable tyrannical regime. Neither of us is being fully honest here, but it doesn't mean we're not serving the cause of altruism. Politics is very messy.
Bottom line: revelations like this from Dooku shouldn't immediately be discarded. Value can be gleaned. That's how intelligence agencies in the real world work!
Yes there are, as crazy as it may sound. I came across one a few weeks back on Reddit, on the main Star Wars board. Thankfully, I didn't spend any time dwelling on their message, for I don't believe such people even deserve the time of actual Star Wars fans.
Too little, too late. They were duped and failed spectacularly, just like von Hindenburg and the clowns in the Weimar Republic who thought entrusting Hitler with the chancellorship was a wise move.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Jan 21, 2020 22:35:05 GMT
what do you guys think Lucas was trying to tell us with this character? He obviously doesn't exist to look cool on the poster and sell action figures, like Darth Mall. Something about rich folks vs. big government? But really just using fear and hate to divide the populace and gain political power?
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jan 21, 2020 22:50:23 GMT
Other than establishing that a Jedi can fall, thus setting a precedent for Anakin, I think the "point" is that the legitimate grievances and criticism against the Republic that Dooku exposes (and that motivate his character) don't excuse the path he chose to take to fix the problem. The path of power. That's another aspect that makes the character unique: he chose to fall. Telling the truth, even if the motive behind it is not so benign is, nonetheless, still truthful. He does tell the truth, but he also tells lies along with it. So honesty is not a quality that I would associate with Dooku. He was deceitful, not honest.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Jan 22, 2020 1:50:41 GMT
Nobody has yet mentioned the ROTS novelisation. I think Matthew Stover does a superb job of fleshing the count out, and his betrayal becomes so much more palpable.
What did ye think of its portrayal of Dooku? Or maybe you've more to say about him in the AOTC novel?
Subtext Mining Do you think we should have three individual threads or one dedicated one for the prequel novelisations?
Great question! I'm gonna have a think about that one and come back to you on it. I may even need to rewatch AOTC. Everyone, including Cryogenic should give you an answer to that one. I think there's more to it than what Subtext has offered.
What I'll say for now is that the prequel basher's idea of Dooku as a "placeholder" that should "never have been included" is simply nonsense. Admittedly, it's not trotted out a lot these days (all the wrath goes towards the romance plot instead), but it was common before. Their believe was that Maul should have been in place for the entire trilogy, and they conveniently overlook that Lucas was the guy behind his revival in TCW - not Filoni.
|
|
|
Dooku
Jan 22, 2020 1:53:18 GMT
Post by jppiper on Jan 22, 2020 1:53:18 GMT
@archduke That would be a Good Idea!
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Jan 22, 2020 4:00:58 GMT
One, definitely one.
And I was being facetious, hoping Stamp would catch it, equating Dooku with Trump. When Trump won in 2016 everyone was making comparisons with Palpatine and the "...liberty dies" thing, but I think Dooku is more fitting.
|
|
|
Dooku
Jan 22, 2020 4:38:04 GMT
via mobile
jppiper likes this
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jan 22, 2020 4:38:04 GMT
One, definitely one. And I was being facetious, hoping Stamp would catch it, equating Dooku with Trump. When Trump won in 2016 everyone was making comparisons with Palpatine and the "...liberty dies" thing, but I think Dooku is more fitting. Oh, you didn't mention Trump. I thought the country had already been divided with the Trayvon case, but this is the wrong thread for that.
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Jan 22, 2020 21:15:33 GMT
The most overlooked villain in Star Wars, to date. I'm a big fan of the character.
He is still being honest. He's essentially giving away the secret behind the magic trick, and for that, despite being a Sith Lord, I have a lot of sympathy for him, much like I did for a more well known Sith Lord when he killed Darth Sidious. Was Vader really just trying to overthrow his master? Was there any sincerity in what he did on the Second Death Star? I would say there was, but you can find people who say not.
Dooku's half truths mixed with truths is not him being like Vader in ROTJ. I fail to see the comparison. Vader's actions, were the ending of something, ending evil, by finding his compassion that he had buried deep down a long time ago. Vader did not mix half truths with truths, he acted on his compassion for the man that was his son. Let us not lose sight on what Dooku was doing in AOTC, his actions in AOTC was not ending something, it was starting something. "I have good news for you my Lord, the war has begun" In AOTC Dooku's mission is to start a war. Once the war has started, he goes back to his Master and tells him of the good news. Dooku is heavily involved in the creating of the clone army, he is heavily involved in the creating of the Separatists army. He is involved in trying to assassinate a Senator of the Republic to try and form an alliance with the Trade Federation. He successfully starts a war that kills millions if not billions and ravages entire worlds. Dooku's telling Obi Wan of Sidious is a means to an end, it's part of Sidious's overall plan to isolate the Jedi. It creates and breeds mistrust between the Jedi and the Senate. We see the seeds that Dooku planted start to blossom immediately. At the end of AOTC, we see the Obi Wan has told the Jedi Council on what Dooku said, and while they note that Dooku is now playing in the realm of the Dark Side, they agree that watching the Senate is a priority. So right away the seeds of suspicion are growing. This is further shown in ROTS when those suspicions center on Palpatine, the leader of the Senate and the Republic. So to me, Dooku's telling Obi Wan of Sidious is not Dooku still trying to do good, but, using the truth in order to isolate the Jedi from the Senate. And lets not forget what Sidious says. "Everything is going as planned". Dooku's actions in AOTC are not that of a conflicted man. He is doing his Masters bidding, he is starting a war, he is setting the seeds of mistrust between the Jedi and the Senate, and he is also trying to score points with Obi Wan to see if there is any chance Obi Wan would be turned and help Dooku kill Palpatine so that He (Dooku) can become the new Master. It's tragic that it went over Obi-Wan's head. I don't blame him for rebuking Tyranus while in captivity, but he really should have followed up on the tip more sooner. Would it have made a difference, you might say? Well, in that hypothetical one must first accept the premise that the Republic was not doomed to failure when Palpatine first became a Senator. But would it? That's the key question: would a discussion with the heads of the Jedi Council on this theory immediately in 22 BBY have made an impact? I'm inclined to say no. The Clone War begins a mere few hours after his capture on Geonosis, which has the profound effect of completely disorientating the Jedi Order, from which they'll never recover. The time for these investigations was, regrettably, gone. How did it go over Obi Wan's head? Again, Dooku is not conflicted here, he is not trying to "destroy the Sith", because he is the Sith! Obi Wan's instincts tell him Dooku is not to be trusted, and Obi Wan is right. Dooku is trying to play everything off as if he did this all because of the Sith threat, Dooku was part of the Sith threat. A very important piece of information that he purposefully leaves out when talking to Obi Wan, this is lying by omission. Furthermore, we see that the Jedi do start to "follow up". At the end of AOTC we see that they acknoeldge that the Senate must be watched. They do not just dismiss what DOoku says and forget about it. We in fact see that when ROTS comes along, that they have grown ever more suspicious of the Senate and Palpatine. No doubt, in part of what they learned in AOTC. The Jedi are not idiots. In the intervening years between AOTC and ROTS they surely investigated. However, just because there was am investigation does not mean they would have found any more truth to who Palpatine was. Also, there are things that are simply not in the Jedi's control. For example the Clone Army. Using the Clone Army is not up to the Jedi. It is up to the Senate. The Jedi have no power and no vote to cast in the Senate. This is demonstrated in a very important scene in AOTC where Mace and Yoda have to watch the Senate debate in a doorway, they do not even have the luxury of a pod to sit in, because they have no place in the Senate. It's these little intricate details that so many people miss in AOTC. It is why I love AOTC so much, there are these tiny details that so many people don't pick up on, but, are very important to the story of how the Jedi work. A lot of the discourse in recent years has centred around the Jedi Order's culpability in the emergence of a Sith dictatorship. I don't disagree - as a quasi special police force tasked with keeping the galaxy safe they have no right to blame the victim card. What's spoken of barely at all though, and which even the long running animation didn't cover, is the role of the galactic public. There are a lot of corrupt politicians in the senate precisely because they were voted in by these people, and it is not acknowledged enough. Palpatine is so beloved by the Republican's citizens that Yoda - an altruistic bureaucrat at the Jedi department - can't afford to intervene, least he damage his institution's reputation. Never mind Obi-Wan Kenobi! Well, I do not blame the Jedi one bit for the Rise of Palpatine, nor the fall of Anakin. However, that is for another thread. But yes, the people of the Republic do share some blame in the rise of Palpatine. However, there is something to also be said about what happens when a government becomes so large, so big, it no longer can be controlled by the people. This is what we see in TPM, that the Republic and it's central government, the Senate has become so bloated and so huge, that nothing gets done anymore. Everyone worries about the single tyrant that tries to move in and take over. However, there is also a concept called the "Tyranny of the Majority". Something that can be just as brutal and crushing as a single Tyrant. In 'Tyranny of the Majority" scenarios, governments that rule purely on the basis of majority, over time, diminish the rights, voices and freedoms of those that do not share the majorities values and ideologies. (not to get too political, but this is why the United States Electoral College is such a brilliant and fundamental tool in combating one group from holding power forever). So it can be assumed that even before Palpatine's rise to power, that the Republic, a government that was a thousands years old, was well into a system of "Tyranny of the Majority" where independent voices, like Naboo, are drowned out in the ocean of corruption and majority. All that said, Dooku is not murdered - he is executed. And he is so on the orders of the Republic, which is also, quite neatly, a Sith betrayal. It's difficult to have too much sympathy for him, especially once you watch The Clone Wars and realise how involved he was in the daily operations of the CIS forces, but I cannot forget how he gave away the whole trick to Obi-Wan on Geonosis. It's probably my favourite scene in Attack of the Clones. Remember though:
One man's separatists is another man's independentists (aka freedom fighters)
Well that's just it, he was an evil man, who started a war under the guise of a freedom fighter. He was not in the war to free the Republic, but, to enslave it under Sith control and tyranny.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jan 22, 2020 22:20:51 GMT
Also, there are things that are simply not in the Jedi's control. For example the Clone Army. Using the Clone Army is not up to the Jedi. It is up to the Senate. The Jedi have no power and no vote to cast in the Senate. This is demonstrated in a very important scene in AOTC where Mace and Yoda have to watch the Senate debate in a doorway, they do not even have the luxury of a pod to sit in, because they have no place in the Senate. It's these little intricate details that so many people miss in AOTC. It is why I love AOTC so much, there are these tiny details that so many people don't pick up on, but, are very important to the story of how the Jedi work. It has always been baffling the ammount of misconceptions that exist in fandom, and this particular point of the clone army, the Jedi and the senate is a recurring one. And then they cast judgement on the wrong characters (the Jedi)... - The Jedi serve the senate, they are not part of it. - The senate gave emergency powers to the Chancellor. - The Chancellor created the army. - The army belongs to the senate (represented by the Chancellor).
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Jan 22, 2020 23:31:16 GMT
Also, there are things that are simply not in the Jedi's control. For example the Clone Army. Using the Clone Army is not up to the Jedi. It is up to the Senate. The Jedi have no power and no vote to cast in the Senate. This is demonstrated in a very important scene in AOTC where Mace and Yoda have to watch the Senate debate in a doorway, they do not even have the luxury of a pod to sit in, because they have no place in the Senate. It's these little intricate details that so many people miss in AOTC. It is why I love AOTC so much, there are these tiny details that so many people don't pick up on, but, are very important to the story of how the Jedi work. It has always been baffling the ammount of misconceptions that exist in fandom, and this particular point of the clone army, the Jedi and the senate is a recurring one. And then they cast judgement on the wrong characters (the Jedi)... - The Jedi serve the senate, they are not part of it. - The senate gave emergency powers to the Chancellor. - The Chancellor created the army. - The army belongs to the senate (represented by the Chancellor). Yes, I think the Jedi are at fault angle is a huge misrepresentation of the Prequels, which gets carried on into TLJ. I have always felt that people tend to have issue with the Jedi because the fans themselves want to be Jedi, but, just as Anakin did, do not want the responsibilities or the sacrifices that come with it. We have Lucas himself saying in one of the Commentaries that the reason Anakin falls is because he isn't listening to the Jedi. So this belief that the Jedi are big meanines, gets carried into areas where the Jedi have no control over. ie the Clone Army, or testifying on behalf of Naboo in TPM when no one called them to testify. The Jedi weren't stupid, they knew there were problems in the Republic, they spoke of it many times. They were hand tied as to what they could do.
|
|