The Phantom Menace Analysis
Apr 16, 2022 21:24:23 GMT
Subtext Mining, Cryogenic, and 2 more like this
Post by Pyrogenic on Apr 16, 2022 21:24:23 GMT
The Phantom Menace Analysis
Heads are repeatedly bitten off/ineffective and power is repeatedly lost…
The bigger fish eats the goober fish that was chasing the bongo, discarding its head. The bigger fish serves as unlikely protection for the heroes in the bongo. It lurks in the shadows until “enemy” fish approach. The underwater is representative of the subconscious, where many dangers lurk. The fish is extremely powerful and focused on eliminating its “allies.”
Sebulba eats the street vendor’s frog that was stolen by Jar Jar Binks, starting with its head. Sebulba is a trickster who cheats his way to winning competitions without getting caught. He also disadvantages Anakin’s pod before he gets the chance to race. He takes great joy in destruction, is easily angered, but is skilled at manipulation.
Jabba the Hutt eats the little creature that was hopping on the balcony, using its head to strike the gong starting the Podrace. Jabba is a fat, sluglike crime lord who deals in illegal activities like the slave trade and gambling. He functions as the emperor of Tatooine and is highly respected despite his ridiculous attitude. He is easily bored and presides over frivolity.
Palpatine “eats” the Republic that was overrun by bureaucracy, eliminating its figurehead Chancellor Valorum and taking his place.
“Are you brain dead?”—Trade Federation. Mistake in assuming brain is alive.
“Are you brainless?”—Gungans. Mistake in assuming brain exists.
“They think their brains so big.”—Naboo. Mistake in assuming one has more of a brain than one really does.
Brain=source of power, being mindful.
Power in ships, hyperdrive, ships as Chancellor, government.
DIVERSION.
Displacement.
Speaking.
Asking permission.
“The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.”
“They continually speak to us, telling us the will of the Force.”
Outsiders think they’re smart—Naboo think brains so big, Outlanders think we know nothing.
Order.
Main conflict as trivial, pointless.
“Safe” refuge isn’t really safe.
War as a chess game.
Bringing others with.
Chair as source of power.
Servants as leaders.
Central authority governing all or autonomy among parts?
Running out of time.
Drawing out, revealing.
Barriers and Shields.
Outskirts vs. Cores.
Surface/underwater.
Clothes make the person, person makes the clothes.
Ownership and false ownership.
National representation in pods.
Demanding gods.
Staying close to Qui-Gon.
Naivety.
Life debts, following.
Gambling, Bargaining, and Negotiation.
Confusion about direction.
Masks of Angels and Demons.
Suppressing information—Qui-Gon, TF to Queen and Palpatine.
Greed.
“Accidents.”
Symbiosis.
Appearances vs. Actuality.
Communication and the lack thereof.
Sandstorms, Bureaucracy, and Obfuscation.
Action and Passion/Masters and Apprentices.
Warmth and Cold.
Warm welcomes.
Rudeness and proper etiquette.
Bogs, Mires, and Swamps.
Outsiders.
Councils.
Diversions.
Slavery.
TF ship as Galaxy.
Assumption and Recklessness.
“Going back.”
Seeing through, transparency.
Midi-chlorians.
The body=The government.
The Chancellor/Emperor=The Mind/Person
The Senate=The Midi-chlorians
The midi-chlorians, as a collective conduit of the Force, inform the person they're in to make certain actions like the Senate does. The Person must ultimately make the decision, however, and can override the "ruling" of the midis like an Executive would.
You let the Senate/Midis guide the Chancellor/Human Mind in making decisions, but if there is an imbalance in either side (midis or person), things will get out of "control" or out of "order."
The Force, as the collective moral will of the galaxy, can suggest evil to those sensitive enough if that's what the people wish to do. If one relies solely on the midis in a dark time, one will act on this collective will, and in turn do terrible things (the Jedi). If one relies only on oneself and one's own mind, one will have no "objective" moral basis for doing anything, and in serving one's own interests alone, one would do terrible things as well (the Sith).
The Jedi are presumably SUPPOSED to follow the will of the Force alone, and this is a bad move considering the moral decay of the world (and government) around them. The Sith are presumably SUPPOSED to follow their own will alone, and this is a bad move as it contributes to the moral decay of the world and government around them.
Palpatine wins and the Jedi lose in the PT because Palps understands this notion of balance (even though he's a Sith) and makes sure that it is the will of the people, and not him, who approves of the decisions and leads to the evil will of the Force. He ACTS only in presenting moral decisions that he then PASSES on. He lets people think bad thoughts, and then he goes with the flow (follows the "passions and prejudices of the Senators"). He does, essentially, what the Jedi aim for. The Jedi, on the other hand, are part of the decay in that they fall for Palps' traps without using their minds (literally) to override the nonsense. But when they do override, it turns out badly and goes against their basic notion of democracy in the first place.
Following the midis=democracy.
Following oneself=dictatorship.
It is only through BOTH that everything can be set right, and this is why EVERYONE, the Jedi and Sith included, had to be recycled into the cosmic garbage facility known as "the Force." Anakin is the avatar of this cycle, and Luke finds the right amount of action and passion to help Anakin press the reset button completely.
Another example is the Sith influencing the midi-chlorians--it fits perfectly and helps us to understand the overall situation. The Sith like to force their will on the group. The Jedi like to force their will on the individual. This is nifty because the Sith manipulation (apparently) leads to the creation of the INDIVIDUAL who has to help the COLLECTIVE.
Should the Senate/Midis control what the Chancellor/Person should do?
Or should the Emperor/Mind dictate what the Senate/Midis should do?
Since we will never really know the real-life answer, the SW films provide a solution: We NEED BOTH, in moderation.
This is one of the reasons why I find TPM to be the most interesting of the films--it lays the PERFECT foundation for one of the most complex themes in the entire series AFTER half of the films had been made, but still provides it at the BEGINNING of the story.
THIS is probably the main reason why midi-chlorians were introduced into the story (even though they accomplish other things, too) and THIS is why they are a GOOD part of the story. They don't "ruin" anything. It's actually the EXACT OPPOSITE--they bring everything together.
Heads are repeatedly bitten off/ineffective and power is repeatedly lost…
The bigger fish eats the goober fish that was chasing the bongo, discarding its head. The bigger fish serves as unlikely protection for the heroes in the bongo. It lurks in the shadows until “enemy” fish approach. The underwater is representative of the subconscious, where many dangers lurk. The fish is extremely powerful and focused on eliminating its “allies.”
Sebulba eats the street vendor’s frog that was stolen by Jar Jar Binks, starting with its head. Sebulba is a trickster who cheats his way to winning competitions without getting caught. He also disadvantages Anakin’s pod before he gets the chance to race. He takes great joy in destruction, is easily angered, but is skilled at manipulation.
Jabba the Hutt eats the little creature that was hopping on the balcony, using its head to strike the gong starting the Podrace. Jabba is a fat, sluglike crime lord who deals in illegal activities like the slave trade and gambling. He functions as the emperor of Tatooine and is highly respected despite his ridiculous attitude. He is easily bored and presides over frivolity.
Palpatine “eats” the Republic that was overrun by bureaucracy, eliminating its figurehead Chancellor Valorum and taking his place.
“Are you brain dead?”—Trade Federation. Mistake in assuming brain is alive.
“Are you brainless?”—Gungans. Mistake in assuming brain exists.
“They think their brains so big.”—Naboo. Mistake in assuming one has more of a brain than one really does.
Brain=source of power, being mindful.
Power in ships, hyperdrive, ships as Chancellor, government.
DIVERSION.
Displacement.
Speaking.
Asking permission.
“The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.”
“They continually speak to us, telling us the will of the Force.”
Outsiders think they’re smart—Naboo think brains so big, Outlanders think we know nothing.
Order.
Main conflict as trivial, pointless.
“Safe” refuge isn’t really safe.
War as a chess game.
Bringing others with.
Chair as source of power.
Servants as leaders.
Central authority governing all or autonomy among parts?
Running out of time.
Drawing out, revealing.
Barriers and Shields.
Outskirts vs. Cores.
Surface/underwater.
Clothes make the person, person makes the clothes.
Ownership and false ownership.
National representation in pods.
Demanding gods.
Staying close to Qui-Gon.
Naivety.
Life debts, following.
Gambling, Bargaining, and Negotiation.
Confusion about direction.
Masks of Angels and Demons.
Suppressing information—Qui-Gon, TF to Queen and Palpatine.
Greed.
“Accidents.”
Symbiosis.
Appearances vs. Actuality.
Communication and the lack thereof.
Sandstorms, Bureaucracy, and Obfuscation.
Action and Passion/Masters and Apprentices.
Warmth and Cold.
Warm welcomes.
Rudeness and proper etiquette.
Bogs, Mires, and Swamps.
Outsiders.
Councils.
Diversions.
Slavery.
TF ship as Galaxy.
Assumption and Recklessness.
“Going back.”
Seeing through, transparency.
Midi-chlorians.
The body=The government.
The Chancellor/Emperor=The Mind/Person
The Senate=The Midi-chlorians
The midi-chlorians, as a collective conduit of the Force, inform the person they're in to make certain actions like the Senate does. The Person must ultimately make the decision, however, and can override the "ruling" of the midis like an Executive would.
You let the Senate/Midis guide the Chancellor/Human Mind in making decisions, but if there is an imbalance in either side (midis or person), things will get out of "control" or out of "order."
The Force, as the collective moral will of the galaxy, can suggest evil to those sensitive enough if that's what the people wish to do. If one relies solely on the midis in a dark time, one will act on this collective will, and in turn do terrible things (the Jedi). If one relies only on oneself and one's own mind, one will have no "objective" moral basis for doing anything, and in serving one's own interests alone, one would do terrible things as well (the Sith).
The Jedi are presumably SUPPOSED to follow the will of the Force alone, and this is a bad move considering the moral decay of the world (and government) around them. The Sith are presumably SUPPOSED to follow their own will alone, and this is a bad move as it contributes to the moral decay of the world and government around them.
Palpatine wins and the Jedi lose in the PT because Palps understands this notion of balance (even though he's a Sith) and makes sure that it is the will of the people, and not him, who approves of the decisions and leads to the evil will of the Force. He ACTS only in presenting moral decisions that he then PASSES on. He lets people think bad thoughts, and then he goes with the flow (follows the "passions and prejudices of the Senators"). He does, essentially, what the Jedi aim for. The Jedi, on the other hand, are part of the decay in that they fall for Palps' traps without using their minds (literally) to override the nonsense. But when they do override, it turns out badly and goes against their basic notion of democracy in the first place.
Following the midis=democracy.
Following oneself=dictatorship.
It is only through BOTH that everything can be set right, and this is why EVERYONE, the Jedi and Sith included, had to be recycled into the cosmic garbage facility known as "the Force." Anakin is the avatar of this cycle, and Luke finds the right amount of action and passion to help Anakin press the reset button completely.
Another example is the Sith influencing the midi-chlorians--it fits perfectly and helps us to understand the overall situation. The Sith like to force their will on the group. The Jedi like to force their will on the individual. This is nifty because the Sith manipulation (apparently) leads to the creation of the INDIVIDUAL who has to help the COLLECTIVE.
Should the Senate/Midis control what the Chancellor/Person should do?
Or should the Emperor/Mind dictate what the Senate/Midis should do?
Since we will never really know the real-life answer, the SW films provide a solution: We NEED BOTH, in moderation.
This is one of the reasons why I find TPM to be the most interesting of the films--it lays the PERFECT foundation for one of the most complex themes in the entire series AFTER half of the films had been made, but still provides it at the BEGINNING of the story.
THIS is probably the main reason why midi-chlorians were introduced into the story (even though they accomplish other things, too) and THIS is why they are a GOOD part of the story. They don't "ruin" anything. It's actually the EXACT OPPOSITE--they bring everything together.