|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 8, 2020 23:02:44 GMT
To be fair, there was almost nothing from the OT in that video either. Sure. But you're defending something that starts off with a 24-second ANH/Leia-based intro. Then, admittedly, it does segue to a 14-second scene involving Ahsoka, but that's not prequel movie territory. It then skips ahead to Rey with Han in the Falcon. Then we see Rebels/TCW footage, Leia, Rose, and Qi'ra -- the latter, of course, being a character in a poorly-received OT spinoff movie. We're a minute into the reel and there hasn't been a trace of Padme, Shmi, Zam, young Beru, Jocasta, or any female Jedi Council members yet. We suddenly are treated to literally a one-second shot of Padme, but it's her TCW variant. Then a small snippet of Ahoska and Anakin (and we never see Anakin and Padme together -- so wrong), then it's back to OT footage with Mon Mothma in ROTJ and Leia on Echo Base. We jump forward to a female pilot from TLJ and Holdo. Still not a lick of prequel movie footage. More Rose, then Jannah, stuff from The Mandalorian, more of Ahsoka from TCW. Then Asajj Ventress. A villain before the kind and compassionate Padme is ever shown in her fleshy movie form! And again, now almost half-way into the trailer, we've still only seen TCW Padme for all of one second. More spinoff women before any other glimpse of the mother of Luke and Leia. Then suddenly Jyn appears at 1:50. These next twenty seconds are a mixture of Jyn and Mon Mothma, more females from "Solo", Rey again, yet another glimpse of Ahsoka (she has appeared four or five times now to Padme's single, fleeting appearance), Zam (our first authentic bit of prequel movie footage, even if lasts for no more than one entire second), Rebels characters I don't know the names of, someone from "The Mandalorian" that I've never watched, and hold up... There's Padme. And Anakin! Blow me down. But again, it's as their TCW variants. And they're on-screen for literally two seconds. Then Leia, Phasma, Rey and Leia, Yoda rip-off Maz Kanata talking to Rey, Ahoska AGAIN!... Zorii. Boy, don't get me wrong... It's great to see all these female avatars in Star Wars. The more, the merrier. But snubbing Padme to this extent is absolutely ridiculous. Oh, look! At 2:53, with barely forty seconds left, some prequel footage is used -- only the second time this has happened since the one-second appearance of Zam. But it's female Jedi. Still no Padme. Oh, yay! Padme as Queen Amidala FINALLY SHOWS UP at 2:57. She is dissolved from the screen a second later. Shmi and Anakin at the 3-minute mark. Wow. They actually get FIVE ENTIRE SECONDS together! Amazing. Still more than movie Padme and Anakin get individually, never mind any scene of them together. Outro segment has the audacity to appropriate the triumphant version of the Star Wars theme which was originally used to wonderful effect at the end of the first TPM teaser trailer, but of course: there's no prequel footage in this segment whatsoever. And it has to tediously culminate and climax on Rey. All female characters who aren't Padme Amidala clearly dominate this reel. Padme is conspicuous by her near-total absence. There's just no getting around that. Once again, someone went out of their way to exclude one of the most prominent and important women in Star Wars. Just another virtue-signalling anti-prequel broadcast from your hyper-woke, diversity-loving entertainment industry. Remember the SJW creed: All characters and eras equal. Some characters and eras more equal than others. Pff. Whatever. It's a dumb clip video. There's an emphasis on the newer movies and cartoons. Big deal.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 8, 2020 23:20:13 GMT
For those of you trying to understand Palpatine's return...
LOL. Half of that sounds pretty interesting and exciting. I guess Palpatine simply has a lot of confidence in the Force and the interactivity of others. Pff. Whatever. It's a dumb clip video. There's an emphasis on the newer movies and cartoons. Big deal. It's part of a broader pattern, though. And they still use enough TCW material to make Padme's exclusion seem questionable. The only movie guise that the reel seems to find Padme acceptable in is in her initial appearance as Queen Amidala. Which is interesting. It's like they're saying she failed when she met Anakin and found love. Because women can be smart, feisty, sassy, adventurous, daring, relentless, but coupling with men is putrid and makes them slaves of the patriarchy. I guess "dumb" really is the word.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Mar 8, 2020 23:25:36 GMT
along with dying of a Broken Heart
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 9, 2020 0:33:37 GMT
The "It looks like she's on top of things" scene was a real missed opportunity.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 9, 2020 8:09:27 GMT
The "It looks like she's on top of things" scene was a real missed opportunity. LOL. Well... I don't see what would have been so bad about including some AOTC arena action! And that line of Padme's in TPM when they're bustin' into the hangar: "Get to your ships!" Or, for a more pensive angle, they could have included this beautiful close-up on Coruscant: Or what about Padme just relaxing and being a young woman in AOTC with Anakin? I just don't buy the idea they were keener to emphasise newer Star Wars material. You can do that and still find space for the main attraction: the saga films and the first three that are the backstory to everything. The reel is a bunch of bullshit where Padme and the prequels go, and this (sadly) is "business as usual" for a company that has gone out of its way to avoid promoting them and associating its other products with them.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Mar 9, 2020 9:57:23 GMT
Padme is among my Top 5 favorite characters of Star Wars, well-above any other female character, including Leia; above universal, axiomatic fandom favorite Han Solo, to further stress my point. I reference the above image (from a new novel) for the essences of her character highlighted so recognizably. There is no quirky concession regarding Padme that lastingly appeals to the modern status quo. She's not sassy-brassy Leia or sullen, self-important Jyn Erso or independent, man-ditching Qi-ra or sporty tennis pro Rey. Three of the four of those ladies as an average are modestly attractive while Emilia Clarke in the role of Qi'ra is a bit more old Hollywood pretty but as a character ultimately walks the path of the solitary femme. Padme however is immemorially archetypal to a level almost Arthurian. She's also the most visual, in my opinion. Monolithic. Yes, because young teenage-blossoming-into-adulthood Natalie Portman is so classically beautiful, it's pained, but moreover how her countenance and patiently demure personification of the character is utilized on screen from every aspect of her makeup/costuming and staging/framing. And as a character, does she not encapsulate so much of the Prequel Trilogy as a whole? Formal and resplendent, but always with something of an ellipsis. The three-film narrative is shaped around Padme in such a manner that lures us to infer everything about her arcing disposition that remains untouched by dialogue, yet without the nagging sense that we're simply patching up ourselves a neglectfully storied character. She is rounded, but impressionistic at a certain lengths. She makes for a seductive character that way.
Indeed, though, trendy thinking these days suffers the false-dichotomy that a strong Queen leader of her planet and driven senator negotiator for the Republic nonetheless amounts to very little just because, also, she loses herself within the turbulent emotionality of Anakin, gets knocked up (pregnancy, a condition increasingly, disturbingly associated with passive weakness these days), and often assumes the role of husband-soother. That's all just so unfashionable. Or perhaps the general dismissal of her character comes down to more basic elements, to the effect that, while either direct or playful in a number of instances opposite Anakin, she never once rejects her deep sympathy for him in favor of smug quips/eye-rolls, or is never once depicted amidst peril scowling or grimacing unisexually. Padme is never NOT intrinsically feminine, is what I'm saying. What has been lost in today's pop-culture climate is how classic femininity is a strength equal to classic masculinity in no small part due to its alternate means.
---EDIT---
Oh and, uh, just to keep things loosely in orbit with the thread topic -- and speaking of King Arthur -- I've been recently meditating how, with The Last Jedi and The Rise of Skywalker together, there are flashes of Mordred going on with Kylo Ren. Not to any one completion, but in both broader aspects and random little details here and there. Just a thing bouncing around in my head.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 9, 2020 12:37:02 GMT
Subtext Mining Can we move this Padmé discussion to a new thread, or to one of the prequel ones if you think one of those would be suitable? It could start with Cryo's reply #246 and so be better titled "The women of Star Wars"? lmao This place cracks me up. Seriously.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Mar 9, 2020 17:30:24 GMT
Subtext Mining Can we move this Padmé discussion to a new thread, or to one of the prequel ones if you think one of those would be suitable? It could start with Cryo's reply #246 and so be better titled "The women of Star Wars"? lmao This place cracks me up. Seriously. This time I am serious. Cryogenic has alerted us to yet another round of snubbing of the PT and it's core characters (one of the TROS trailers was another example), and I think that calls for its own thread. There's people out there (fellow prequelists) who've given up on debating the sequels, and are no longer interested in viewing this thread, so we owe to them to make them aware. I just don't buy the idea they were keener to emphasise newer Star Wars material. You can do that and still find space for the main attraction: the saga films and the first three that are the backstory to everything. The reel is a bunch of bullshit where Padme and the prequels go, and this (sadly) is "business as usual" for a company that has gone out of its way to avoid promoting them and associating its other products with them. I couldn't agree more. When you're showing more of an animated character - and in Vendress, far from a leading one at that - you clearly know what you're doing and you deserve every bit of criticism that will come you're way for barely concealed prejudices.
Gotta love the higher rated comments underneath the video. Joint top:
Nailed it:
Somebody thinks very similarly to me in this one:
Adding some humour to the message:
More good stuff:
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 9, 2020 17:50:05 GMT
😆 Now that's funny.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 9, 2020 19:26:22 GMT
lmao This place cracks me up. Seriously. This time I am serious. Cryogenic has alerted us to yet another round of snubbing of the PT and it's core characters (one of the TROS trailers was another example), and I think that calls for its own thread. There's people out there (fellow prequelists) who've given up on debating the sequels, and are no longer interested in viewing this thread, so we owe to them to make them aware. Excellent points. I completely support you in this effort. I'm at fault for not making a unique thread to begin with. I looked down the existing ones and couldn't see a place for the video and the alert I wanted to put out about it. I considered creating a new thread, but had something of a mental block about what to call it and how to frame it. And speaking more generally: (to stampid) What's wrong with diversifying the forum with more threads? Less is more, but sometimes, more is more. Is Arch Duke a bit "trigger happy" when deeming a discussion to be off-topic and deserving of a unique thread? "Possibly." But his general reasoning is sound. Another excellent point. Spotlighting side characters and female villains whilst showing almost nothing of a major female character -- arguably the most significant female character in all of Star Wars -- is ludicrous. They have, as you just said, opened themselves up to criticism, in addition to (counting all their other snubs) suspicion, distrust, censure, detraction; even a major fan exodus. Their bias stinks. Remarkably, after eight years of owning the brand and being savaged in recent times for their output, with many fans now open about their hatred toward the Sequel Trilogy and murmuring newfound respect for the prequels under numerous YouTube videos, they still think they can pull the same tricks and get away with it. Their Stalinist erasure of the prequels is unbelievable; especially when, to many, their own products have been found seriously wanting and lacking in heart, vision, intelligence, gravitas, and direction. Ah! Great stuff, indeed. Can't really improve on the Vader one, but this one (a personal favourite) also comes to mind: Don't go. Your presence is soothing.Sounds like they've been studying at the school of PrequelMemes!
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Mar 9, 2020 20:41:23 GMT
AND SHE'S THE FREAKING MOTHER OF LUKE AND LEIA!
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 9, 2020 20:49:52 GMT
The post volume and membership here doesn't even warrant a forum. This is like a glorified chatroom, with 5 books and 3 people arguing whether they should be listed by author, by title, or by subject and they're all the same subject!
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 9, 2020 21:45:37 GMT
AND SHE'S THE FREAKING MOTHER OF LUKE AND LEIA! Hardly a fact that can be avoided... Unless you're Disney/Lucasfilm, that is. The post volume and membership here doesn't even warrant a forum. This is like a glorified chatroom, with 5 books and 3 people arguing whether they should be listed by author, by title, or by subject and they're all the same subject! I don't know. Threads are like nodes. They allow for more ordered thinking and provide sparking-off points. I don't think it hurts to have a decent number of them, even if it kinda sucks that a lot haven't made it past the first page. The forum itself is a sort of half-way house between a chatroom and a message board. Arch Duke and I have tried to entice a few people and make it a bit more lively. But it's not our fault if people don't want to join or participate. We like to think of this place as being like Naboo, but it's more like Tatooine: sparsely populated. You can't get everything you want in life. Unless, perhaps, you're prepared to wait a long time. Dealing with people is difficult. People are flighty and averse to putting much effort into most things. They have to have a strong inner compulsion; or you have to feed the latent fire within them. I'm sure, in the back of your mind, you're probably comparing this place to TFN, or maybe IMDb. Unfortunately, those sites were better promoted to begin with, and they had a huge head-start over this little board, which is relatively remote and humble. Of course, being small and out of the way also has its advantages. There's no need to constantly divide threads and slice them up like watermelons, but this thread is already of a decent size. In fact, it's by far the lengthiest thread on the board right now. Separating out the discussion pertaining to Padme and the "International Women's Day" video makes perfect sense to me. You're annoyed that this place isn't doing better. So am I. But as long as some people are posting, I can kinda ride it out, for now. I'll admit, I do feel the pull to the light dark of TFN, because Naberrie Fields is boring and the lack of activity and rambunctious dialectic is cheesing me off. I share your basic feeling. However, I try to remember that it was created as a retreat -- a hidden city/sacred place -- and was never meant to be a replacement for a busy discussion space. Perhaps now you understand, when people are starting out with something, they often complain that it's hard, toiling away in obscurity for any number of years, barely getting noticed. Getting a boulder moving is really hard. As long as you keep your expectations in check, you can never really be disappointed in life. That's how I try to see it, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 10, 2020 1:43:26 GMT
I'm surprised you're missing the obvious metaphor. This is not Tatooine. It's Ach-To. You've even shut yourself off from theForce(.net) This place is an Ach-To Puss's Garden. There. I said it.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 10, 2020 2:33:35 GMT
I'm surprised you're missing the obvious metaphor. This is not Tatooine. It's Ach-To. You've even shut yourself off from theForce(.net) This place is an Ach-To Puss's Garden. There. I said it. Cute. But your metaphor doesn't hold up too well. Here's why: i) Prequel fans were censored and some -- including myself -- were banned from TFN: for the simple crime of refusing to surrender their free thought and bow to the whims of nakedly autocratic, duplicitous (and, in some cases, pathological) moderators, who consciously imposed rules discouraging/forbidding certain lines of discussion, which was functionally equivalent to their silencing criticism against Disney. This also happened at a very specific time: In 2017, the year of Star Wars' 40th anniversary, after the combined and apparently unquestionable success of TFA and "Rogue One" at the box-office, with "The Last Jedi" in its final stages of post-production. There was an implicit distaste of "minority" backlash against Disney at this time, and a focused attempt at stamping it out (no pun intended). Order 66 would be a more apt analogy here. Sadly, it tends to be the way humans behave, when they believe they are in the right and have the backing of a (false) consensus. Very little tolerance is usually extended to minority viewpoints; even when -- of all things -- "diversity" is supposedly the sacred value here in need of protecting/respecting/enlarging. ii) I petitioned for an explanation regarding my ban, on three separate occasions, and none was ever supplied to me. I was also completely locked out of the "unban request forum" -- a sort of message board purgatory that moderators constantly threaten members with (another pathetic tactic) -- so I had to resort to alternate means of sending my three aforementioned requests. Again, I never heard back from anyone. Much later, PT moderator Seagoat contacted me on Facebook. I forgot that he was in my friends list on there. He saw some comments I made on my wall and piped up out of nowhere. Note that I am speaking in the past tense. We had a collegial conversation, and Seagoat, though denying there was anything authoritarian about TFN, promised he would help get my account restored if that was my wish. Though, he told me, it would require me making a case that I'm not a "problem". While I felt he probably meant well, I found this notion rather offensive; not least because I never received an official explanation for my ban in the first place. Later, I was alerted by a Naberrie Fields member that Seagoat publicly lied when asked about several suspicious disappearances of prominent members (he claimed no bans had taken place and reassured the person asking that the disappearances could be chalked up to people moving on). I decided to terminate my association with him after that. iii) I still visit TFN for the quality fan insight offered in the ST forum(s), just as it used to be offered in the PT forum(s). The conduct of various members of the Star Wars/TFN community should, as best as possible, be kept separate from the Stalinist repression of the thought police that watch over the forums there at all times. What makes TFN what it is is, and such a boon to read (and add to -- assuming you haven't been banned or personally left in disgust), are the deep and fine-grained insights that sometimes fall out of a particular thread or mini-exchange within a thread. It's still a delight to see fans engaging with these films and having such insights. Of course, the territory has shifted. By and large, it's no longer prequel fans having these insights. A lot of them seem to dislike the ST and some manifest a passive-aggressive bitterness toward it. So it's other members I'm reading today. But I still treasure those earlier discussions on the prequels -- many of which occurred before I joined. In fact, like many who later began posting there, I was a lurker before I made an account. TFN has always excelled when it comes to fan discussion, and I'm happy to see that continuing with the ST films. Even though, boy, there are a lot of unhappy bunnies there. If I were to return, I'd want some guarantee that the existing mods involved in my banning do one of two things: a) Catch the coronavirus. b) Throw themselves off a cliff. I'm generous, see. I believe in freedom of choice. And there, I guess, is your "Ahch-To" metaphor, right where it should be.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Mar 10, 2020 2:55:27 GMT
I'm not seeing how your beef with the mods makes the metaphor less applicable. I don't blame you for giving up though. Frankly, I don't have the patience to deal with the rabble there anymore either. HeavyDevy seems to have taken up the torch.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 10, 2020 3:22:09 GMT
I'm not seeing how your beef with the mods makes the metaphor less applicable. I don't blame you for giving up though. Frankly, I don't have the patience to deal with the rabble there anymore either. HeavyDevy seems to have taken up the torch. You're going to the wrong trilogy, in this case, for the metaphor. Us prequel fans are more like Obi-Wan and Yoda. Luke chooses to go the island. His Jedi forebears are more or less cast out of the society by the machinations of evil. There's quite a rabble on TFN, and that's draining, in and of itself. However, said rabble wouldn't necessarily hold me back, if I felt I could speak at will. But that's not the case, as very recent evidence shows where other prequel fans are concerned. Even ST fans. I'm loving HevyDevy's posts and his earnest enthusiasm for the new films. He is definitely one of those exceptions to the rule. We need more of those people in life. Good on him.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Mar 10, 2020 13:02:03 GMT
The post volume and membership here doesn't even warrant a forum. This is like a glorified chatroom, with 5 books and 3 people arguing whether they should be listed by author, by title, or by subject and they're all the same subject!
Tell me, Stamp, what efforts have you put into promoting this forum?
Oh, and by the way, your cynicism isn't entertaining anyone. A lot of people have worked hard to get this forum to the modest place it's at now, and I for one do not appreciate people who seek to delegitimise all that.
Keep your tired sardonic tricks away from this forum.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on Mar 10, 2020 18:48:50 GMT
On this same topic, I have lately avoided talking about the ST or my views on it at TFN. I occasionally do, but only when I know it is safe.
Not because of mod censorship, but because I have made friends there with people who like the ST. It's all too easy to be labeled a "hater" or "part of the problem". I like to keep peace with fellow users.
I don't like the idea of "fan wars" or "trilogy wars". We all like which movies we like. The marketing by Disney doesn't help extinguish the flames. They seem to be as engaged in the trilogy wars as the Reddit meme subreddits
(tangent- I don't like the argument that memeability makes a movie or movie trilogy good. It can stand on it's own without memes)
I hate the Padme thing too. I've lately come to realize the truth about Disney's snubs of the PT, and by extension, all of Lucas's saga and the precedent he built.
I've voiced opinions before about Padme's arc, but I do not think she is a weak woman, or became weak as a result of marriage. Another Star Wars love story has also put that one in perspective, as I've explained before. Even the closest behavior Padme demonstrates to fitting that category pales compared to another Star Wars female lead bending over backwards for a stranger who showed nothing to say he deserved it.
This would lose me some credibility elsewhere, but I'm honestly not interested in more of The Mandalorian, or anything else. It will all tie into a canon that disrespects what it has built off of. The only thing I'm at all excited for is Kenobi because of Ewan.
TROS sealed that for me. I tried. Sorry to vent.
And yes, it does seem as though the same parts of Star Wars are still the "punching bag".
|
|
rayo1
Ambassador
Posts: 65
|
Post by rayo1 on Mar 10, 2020 18:57:05 GMT
Not sure where else to put this (someone may advise). I may have done my best to invest in the Sequel Trilogy over time, starting with a re-examination of TLJ last year, but don't think that makes me a fan of all things Disney. It most certainly does not. Here is another example of their pathetic bias and deplorable cowardice toward all things prequel. Note how little prequel footage is used in their just-released "International Women's Day" celebratory reel: The fact that this is still happening in 2020... You know what... screw them. Me: Where the hell is Padmé and why is Rey (the character that went against her dying wish of having the twins on Naboo and not Tatooine) on the thumbnail? Disney: We can explai-- Me: My apologies. You do have a great many things to explain.
|
|