|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Aug 23, 2019 23:05:57 GMT
One question that often springs to my mind as I rewatch the PT is to what extent Sheev Palpatine engineered the events that took place across the three films - the Galactic Republic's final 13 years. An unlucky 13 years, to say the least. We all know the hidden Sith Lord was behind the origins of the Republic-CIS War, and the invasion of Naboo via his Trade Federation vassal before that, but just how much else had he his hands in? Many mysterious things take place across the PT and it’s quite ambiguous as to what happened.
I will propose a list of key events from the trilogy, and I'd like to hear whether you believe Palpatine was behind them, or not: maybe it was someone (or something) else or just a “coincidence”. Please feel free to explain your reasoning, and to cite other analysts.
- Anakin's birth
- Anakin’s nightmares of Shmi
- The capture and torture of Shmi Skywalker
- Anakin’s visions of Padmé dying in childbirth
- The death of Padmé
If you think there are other important events that I haven't mentioned, do share them with us.
Please note: keep the ST and OT out of this conversation, they are not relevant. This is Palpatine in relation to the PT.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Aug 24, 2019 8:27:33 GMT
I think Palpatine had nothing to do with any of those. But he definitely took advantage of all of them (except Anakin's nightmares of Shmi).
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Aug 24, 2019 13:11:35 GMT
Well, a similar sort of question is: Who or what is behind the terrible "war of nature", to use Charles Darwin's stark wording, that seems to define all sentient existence? The Earth alone is a dense biological staging ground on which almost all the life that once respired and replicated itself within or beneath its thin haze of atmosphere is now extinct. And all the creatures "lucky" to be born at all must fight to survive against starvation, predation, dehydration, hypothermia, drowning, pestilence, natural disaster, genetic variation and mutation (or the phenotypic and physiological impact of such variation and mutation), rape, mutilation, senescence, and ultimately, cellular death, to stake their momentary place on a fraction of dot, lost in the forbidding ocean of space and the gaping immensity of time, in the face of a universe that seems indifferent, at best, and often downright hostile, to their coming into being at all. And this incredibly violent, utterly pitiless chamber drama may be happening throughout the universe, on trillions of worlds, ceaselessly, without intervention or relief, to seemingly no particular end. Who are to blame for that? God? Satan? The Demiurge? Some kid in his basement who got a bit carried away and created a small computer simulation for his or her own amusement? I think Palpatine is the closest thing we've yet seen in Star Wars to the Platonic Demiurge. He's the dark creator, destroyer, and sustainer of the architected reality of Star Wars -- imprisoning yet giving odd life to the characters we see on the screen, and having a direct impact in our world (our personal and cultural addiction to the series), too. It's definitely a little weird to think about. If you don't think so, maybe you haven't thought enough about it! ------------------------ It's plausible that Palpatine basically affects and/or effects every particular outcome, but the outcomes where he's having a more overt and comprehensible effect would be all those times he prods a character into doing something by effectively (haha) whispering poison in their ear. Of course, that's because you can see and hear him doing these things and going to work like a pro, but he might be having "other" effects, elsewhere on the story, too. To that end, you might want to adduce his strong hinting to Anakin that he had something to do with his conception or birth in Episode III, or his boasting to Luke that "everything that has transpired has done so according to [his] design" in Episode VI. The latter remark would seem to be more for the benefit of the audience (all of Palpatine's lines have this dimension, in fact), since any viewer who has seen the prequels is more filled-in on galactic history than Luke, and can fancy that this boast applies to all of Palpatine's machinations (and not merely his leading the rebels, in the final battle, into a trap). The idea of Palpatine designing events and causing things to come to pass according to his will also has deistic and demiurge-istic implications. It is also notable, or it may be apropos of nothing, that TPM bears a lot in common with Shakespeare's play "The Tempest", as well as demonstrating a few visual resonances with "The Forbidden Planet", the classic 1956 science-fiction film that is a re-telling of the same play (it made the science-fiction genre into a more artistic and meaningful film genre: a precursor to both modern science-fiction cinema and to Lucas making the B-movie a more serious thing with Star Wars and Indiana Jones). "The Tempest" features a character called Prospero: the main protagonist and the Duke (!!) of Milan within the story (sort of how Palpatine is almost the Duke of Naboo!!!!), who uses magic and controls a great deal of the narrative. As Spark Notes puts it: www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/tempest/character/prospero/Not unlike the way Palpatine (both names begin with the same letter and have the same number of syllables) has such an enormous impact as to -- in his case, perhaps, unwittingly -- bring about a happy end at the close of the main saga. The extract goes on to say: Palpatine, while he may be the arch villain of the saga, ends up having a similar function. He seems to be Lucas' surrogate in the story, and through the lessons that Palpatine teaches -- albeit: with twisted intent -- we are meant to feel or sense some of the creative tensions and difficulties involved in cohering the artwork into a single piece: a unified six-part experience. In addition, Lucas is furnishing us with his own framework on morality and justice, using the dark mentor of Palpatine to establish a firm sense of "right" and "wrong". Palpatine even says to Luke at the end of the saga that he is looking forward to completing his training. And, by extension, he is completing the training of the audience, whose members have been quietly apprenticed to Palpatine as they have sat and watched the saga unfold and build to conclusion. ------------------------ A few years ago, I wrote out this brief meditation on Palpatine on that other Star Wars website. The one that likes to censor and ban prequel fans whenever they start running their mouth about the Disney transition, or when they take to complaining about unequal treatment vis-a-vis those that tear into the prequels and their fans and troll for Disney. Anyway, here it is: Palpatine is really the "Dark Side" of the characters' internal misgivings, indiscretions, and vanities being reflected back on them. Palpatine invites the characters to embrace their turmoil; and in that way, he's only really returning what they send out -- as if he weren't really "there" (as a separate character) at all... Some chosen lines and a little breakdown for each: - "Wipe them out. All of them."
Go on, you know you want to... - "I love democracy. I love the Republic." Thinks Jar Jar contentedly and uncritically for finally finding acceptance after his little speech gains uproarious applause. - "I can feel your anger. It gives you focus. Makes you stronger." Hey, I'm allowed to be mad and awesome. This anger thing could really take me places, after all... - "You could call for a Vote of No Confidence..."
I could, couldn't I? - "Master Yoda, do you really think it will come to war?" This whole Jedi-serving-the-Galactic-Republic thing; I always knew it would end in disaster... - "The Dark Side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural." Yeah, to hell with the likes of Obi-Wan and Yoda. I can write my own destiny... The Phantom Menace, indeed.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Aug 26, 2019 3:17:54 GMT
As far as Anakin's birth, Lucas intentionally left it a mystery and open to interpretation which is how I think it should be. Not much need to develop theories on it except for fun. The other four, I certainly so no. I mean, I'm open to the ideas, but I just don't see it. They're too convoluted and they're not what I see as Lucas' style. If one day he did say that one or more were true I might be able to reconcile that in my head, but I'm not holding my breath I do have to admit though, I've wondered a couple times about Palpatine having something to do with Anakin's dream of Padmé, before I'd heard anyone else suggest it. But I highly doubt it. Now, as far as Shmi, I'm firmly in the no camp, but still, there is one thing I can't seem to shake. And I've never mentioned this at TFN because I don't want people to run with it The music cues. The rescue sequence begins as Padmé walks out to see Anakin off, and we hear a haunting rendition of the Kamino melody. Which to me denotes among other things, Palpatine's machinations. Then during Anakin's confession we hear The Emperor's Theme. I can understand Vader's Theme for foreshadowing, but The Emperor's Theme? Eh, It's probably nothing. And in the vein of Cryo's post: if you think about it, Palpatine crafted the invasion of Naboo, which brought Qui-Gon to Naboo and then to Tatooine where Anakin met him and Padmé. Anakin was freed from slavery leaving Shmi free to do as she pleased with her life. And so on and so on. So indirectly yes, I suppose you could trace things back casually to Sheevster. But again, yes, it all ended up contributing to his ultimate undoing. If he had just left well enough alone, he could've gone on living for who knows how long (Seems the harder the Sith push to accomplish their goals, the more they consequently end up pushing the good guys into a solution to overcome it).There should be a Star Wars special version of: It's A Wonderful Life starring Palpatine, where he sees what the GFFA would be life if he had never been born. But seriously, while invoking Darwin; while part of evolution is driven by competition and cruelty, it's important to remember it's also equally driven by cooperation and compassion (in it's many animal & human variants), precariously balanced. Sidious representing the former and The Old Republic/Jedi, Padmé and the Rebellion representing the latter. And remember, who do we see as Anakin enters the theatre? O, brave new world, that has such people in it.
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Aug 31, 2019 22:27:00 GMT
Felicity Jones from R1. But here in another role Some remarks on the main topic: my big problem with these theories (they are rather popular amongst fans)is that they represent Palpatine as almighty Sith lord that can do everything, can foresee everything and can win in any situation. Only is not that at all: even in OT we see examples of Emperor's mistskes and his big mistake is to think that he can overcome the love of the father to his son of course, we see also examples that he cannot foresee everything (he couldn't feel Luke's presence on Endor) and so on. We could see this even in Episode 1: I want this treaty signed! Yes we could speculate that Sidious is lying to Nute Gunrey but then again why sending Maul to search for the queen and bring her back to Naboo to sign the treaty?? So he is expecting the plan f the treaty to go as he predicted but it doesn't . So what Palpatine does? He changes the tactics. Because, the unfortunately evil genius of Palpatine is that he is brilliant strategist and opportunist. If he had a slogan, it would be: We can use this in our advantage (something that he not only repeats several times but constantly applies in his schemes, yes, even in OT). Is what the real opportunists do: they use every consequence in their advantage even when it looks like they are loosing: the queen refuses to sign the treaty and succeeds to come to Coruscant but Palpatine changes the tactics and decided to use the fact that the queen is in Coruscant. Like in OT, in Episode 5 where at first he said that Luke should be destroyed aхd then when Vader proposes to try to convince him to come to their side Palpatine again changes the tactics and decides that Luke should be neutralized by joining their side (he made a mistake with Luke but I give this as example how is possible to change the tactics in a completely different direction and stay with the same goal). And the good strategists do exactly this: they change the tactics and the meaning used as often as is necessary but they never change their main goal. Is indeed the way that they achieve the goal, changing the details in their plan according to the circumstances; exactly because they can’t foresee everything. What happened in Ep.1 is a perfect example for this. The main purpose here is to cause the crisis of Naboo and if this treaty is signed this would make the position of Valorum even weaker, in the following turmoil Palpatne could accumulate more power and be closer to the position of Supreme Chancellor (and of course he could be elected, he would arrange that). When the queen comes to the capital he changes completely the tactics and he succeeds in the elections (first with the vote of no confidence and then when the crisis continues as he arranged that with his election of Chancellor). He looses Maul in the process but he succeeds in the main goal and covers his tracks well. But if he could foresee everything , he wouldn't say: wipe them out, all of them (as Anakin is included in "all of them"). Same with Episode 2.
Some viewers even speculate that he arrange the meeting of Anakin and Padme but that theory that he invented such sophisticated plan only to make Anakin and Padme meet again is far from truth for me. Even more, this would diminish the role of Padme here. Because again, let’s ask the main question: which is the primary goal of Sidious plan at that moment? Establishing the Empire, yes, but in that moment this includes starting a war. And the big obstacle here is the so called Military Creation act (i.e. if it is stopped). And the big rival of the Act is senator Amidala. In the beginning Palpatine uses the personal hate of Gunrey who hires bounty hunters to kill the senator but then when the attempt fails, Palpatine changes the tactics. You can see his ability to change his mind so quick in the little moment when Yoda express his concerns for Padme. Exactly then Palpatine proposes that the Senator should be guarded by the Jedi (so now they cannot refuse). And why he does that? For two main reasons: 1. The additional security indeed would be disruptive for Padme, as he said: in the end if the attempts continue every normal bodyguard would propose hiding (as eventually the Jedi do too) and this means that she would be away from Coruscant 2. If Padme is killed then again she cannot stand against the military creation act and also a “bonus”: this would be Jedi’s failure (and in these circumstances is very important that the Jedi should have failures) and he would act like the good guy again. So no matter what the result is , Palpatine would win. This is his twisted talent: to elaborate the situation in such way that no matter the result is he would take advantage of it. P.S. I could accept that the Chancellor chooses Kenobi for the task to protect Padme not only because Padme knows him for very long time (so she would accept him as bodyguard) but also because is like an opportunity for Anakin to shine amongst the Jedi if they succeed. But if they fail, then it would be Kenobi fault as he is the master and this indeed would diminish his “status” in Anakin’s eyes so this again would work for Palpatine.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Sept 1, 2019 3:34:27 GMT
Time for me to start answering my own questions!
No, I am not one of those crazy theorists who believe Palpatine had his paws in everything thing that occurred over the 3 films and the animated series. I can certainly understand why some might feel this way, as it does seem that he is unstoppable in key parts of the Trilogy: like his dictatorship is only inevitable.
"Everything that has transpired has done so according to my plan"
- The Emperor, 4 BBY
Yet, according to my own philosophy of history, nothing is inevitable. Everyone has agency, and can and do effect, and are affected by, the events of their time. Then there is our environment, which means we all have to adapt in the appropriate ways in order to achieve our goals. Palpatine, in the case of our mythology - our supernatural version of history - is a special individual: not only does he command The Force, but his abilities in its Dark Side far outweigh anything that the rival Jedi Council has to offer.
Prequel paradox
Looking back from the Original Trilogy, we know that Palpatine couldn't have become emperor overnight. If the the Jedi were "The guardians of peace and justice in the Galaxy" for "over a thousand generations" as Kenobi tells us, then they must have suffered a spectacular defeat at some point. That immediately calls for not only a powerful villain, but one who must have carried a lot of intelligence to subvert a Republic which had endured a millennia of peace.
If the story of Palpatine's rise to power was going to be told then, he couldn't just be any ordinary plotter, while his opponents, the Jedi, couldn't wield unfathomable power - they would need to be very flawed in order to make it work. In short: it would have to be a freak event, a Black Swan (Also a film about Padmé's ballet career)
In must have been quite a riddle for Lucas back in the mid-late 90s, when he started devising an outline for his new trilogy. How do I make my villain's path to power believable, yet also not seem inevitable? How do I give the Jedi and the Republic's politicians a chance, how do I show that they made critical mistakes that allowed it to happen? How do I make it appear that, in real-time, for the people inside the SW universe, the Galactic Empire was neither predictable nor completely unseen. And, moreover: how do I get my audience invested, without feeling doomed by the horror they all know will come? That is the age old dilemma of telling a tragedy!
The genius of Lucas was to have his villain hiding in plain sight, appearing as a mere politician of the Senate. Therefore Palpatine wasn't going to come out of nowhere in a coup d'état, for his victory was going to come from within, as he would twist, degrade and slowly undo the Republic from right under its nose. Like Hitler then, the Dark Lord would gain his legitimacy by the will of the people. Scary stuff.
Palpatine as it turns out would both puppeteer events, and take advantage of exceptional circumstances. So let's return to answering the key events I highlighted above:
Anakin's Birth
No, I don't believe he was responsible for this. It is a popular fan theory among some, but the truth is that it was the Force itself which conceived him - in reaction to the meddling of the Sith. Palpatine is a serial liar, so it is unsurprising that he wouldn't offer Anakin the full truth in their conversations.
Anakin’s nightmares of Shmi
This one is left deliberately ambiguous. It's not quite clear if it was Anakin generating them, or the influence of a Sith Lord, who let's not forget at that point had long had his eyes on him. Ever since he arrived on Coruscant, in fact. I'm not so certain.
The capture and torture of Shmi Skywalker
If he did so, it would have been done under Dooku who have arranged for the Sand People to kidnap her. We'd already seen a shrewd plan like the creation of the Clone Army take effect in Episode II, so this isn't beyond possibility.
Anakin’s visions of Padmé dying in childbirth
Unlike with Shmi, I'm pretty adamant that it was Palpatine planting these particular visions. We see lots of evidence throughout Episode III that the Sith Lord is capable of extraordinary feats of telepathy and mind-reading.
Before Anakin can even say anything Palpatine knows: "They want you to spy on me, don't they?"
When in a different part of the Galaxy to his new apprentice: "Lord Vader is in trouble".
Given his Darth Plagueis monologue, which, in reality is a concealed way of offering Anakin a solution to his greatest fear, it is very reasonable to suspect that Palpatine instilled that fear in the first place. He knows that he and Padmé are secretly married, so why wouldn't he exploit that? Why wouldn't he use what Anakin has been desperately concealing from the Jedi against him? This is a man who has been preying on Anakin since he was 10 years old, in the hope of one day converting him to his wicked ways. Why would he not take advantage of Anakin's emotional and loving attachment to his wife? So why not blackmail him? Why not put her life at risk, and pretend that he can prevent it? It's no coincidence that Palpatine isn't the slightest surprised about Padmé's life being in danger - he's had a hand in it, and he knows that he's closer to her than he is with the Jedi.
Lucas also has this one deliberately ambiguous, but it doesn't take much to put 2 and 2 together. Palpatine's manipulations and deception are written all over Revenge of the Sith.
The death of Padmé
Absolutely. Padmé is a device he uses to lure Anakin to the Dark Side. Once he's turned, and he's satisfied that Anakin is committed to annihilating the Jedi, his wife is simply disposable. If anything, she is a potential threat to him remaining indefinitely with the Sith, so why wouldn't Palpatine want her out of the picture?
When in a different part of the Galaxy he can tell she's died: "It appears in your anger, you killed her"
Like most of the time, Palpatine is telling a half-truth here, and pinning the blame on his new apprentice is exactly what he needs to do in order to unleash his anger - keeping him deeper and deeper enclosed within the Dark Side. We can also see a guilty smile on the new emperor's face. How does he know Padmé has died? He's played a part in zapping her life force.
Padmé is also a prominent senator, who opposes his actions as Supreme Chancellor. If you don't think he's prepared to assassinate her, you need to rewatch Episode II more closely. Any would-be emperor needs to have to hit-list of enemy politicians.
A medical droid is not force-sensitive, and the one that does speak to Obi-Wan & Bail even admits to not knowing the full truth, "We don't know why". The explanation it gives for her dying is "lost the will to live" but this comes off as guesswork to me. Does Padmé really look like she's unprepared to keep living when she sees her newborn children? Look at her hands move, and the excitement in her eyes as Obi-Wan brings her newborn children to her, she even names them. She is not giving hope here - there is something supernatural at play.
The "died of a broken heart" solution, though possible in extreme circumstances in the real world, comes from angry fans taking a line of dialogue out-of-context to suit their own dissatisfaction. If you'd heard you're good husband had suddenly done terrible deeds why wouldn't you be heartbroken? Twisting that then as a cause of death is ridiculous, and it's astonishing how many believe it.
So what are "The reasons we can't explain"? None other than the mystery that is The Force, and Palpatine has manipulated it. To understand how the Sith Lord would have achieved this you need to study the heartbeats of Anakin and Padmé, which not coincidentally stop at the very same time
For more on this theory, check out this very good video:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-km9S_1rwo
TL;DR
A: NO
B: Maybe
C: Maybe
D: YES
E: YES
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Oct 24, 2019 2:29:53 GMT
A) Anakin's Birth- I know Lucas toyed with this idea, and in fact removed a line of dialogue that pretty much said that Palpatine created Anakin. I was never a big fan of this. I think of the saying evil begets evil. Basically, if Anakin is created by evil, than his choices are made for him in the grand scheme of things. I like it more that the Force created Anakin, and thus his choices were his own.
B and D) I never really felt Anakin's nightmares either of Shmi or Padme were created by Palpatine. We see this power is handed down to Luke, when in ESB, he is able to see the future where his friends are in pain. Now here's the kicker though that will cook your noodle. Now we know how Vader knew to torture Han and Leia. He knew that there was a good chance his son would see the visions of his friends and loved ones in pain, and would want to do something about it. So he knew his trap for Luke would work and bring Luke to him. Vaders used his experiences as Anakin to trap his son.
C) Never crossed my mind that Palpatine was involved.
E) Never crossed my mind Palptine was involved.
Now here is something that i'm surprised never gets talked about. I brought it up on the TFN forums years ago, and it seemed to blow a few peoples minds. How Palpatine laid out his plan in Revenge Of The Sith using General Grievous.
We all know that Palpatines capture at the beginning of ROTS is a staged event. It is setup because Palpatine wants to test Anakin, to see if Anakin is ready to be turned. Once Anakin murders Dooku, Palpatine is now ready to set his endgame in motion.
After being "rescued", Palpatine meets with Mace. This is important, because this sets up the golden goose that the Jedi now have to chase. Mace is under the assumption that now that Dooku is dead, Palpatine will start to hand back powers to the Senate, as this is a sign the war is going to start to wind down. Afterall, the Seps just lost their leader. However, Palpatine informs Mace that he will not be handing back any powers and the war will not end until General Grievous is killed or captured. Mace's reply... finding Grievous will now be the Jedi's top priority. See, Palpatine knows that the Jedi suspect him of something. They want Palaptine to step down.. He knows, that once they find Grievous, they will come looking for Palpatine to step down and give up his emergency powers. Palpatine has made General Grievous a very very very important piece on the chess board.
So what does Palpatine do? Well he starts to really push that wedge between Anakin and the Jedi, he knows Anakin is ripe for the picking, and Palpatine has set his final plan in motion. He knows the Jedi Council want Anakin as close to him (Palpatine) as possible. Palpatine starts moving his pawns to their final positions on the board. He sends the Sep Leaders to Mustafar, and not because he is trying to protect them. After a little time of working on Anakin, Palpatine now does a very important thing. He is the one that gives up the where abouts of General Grievous.. you know, the same General Grievous that he made the extremely important piece that would end the war and would make him give back emergency powers. SO he knows the Jedi will move. So it's Palpatine that sets this all in motion. He gives up General Grievous because he knows the Jedi will send their most reliable battle field general, Obi Wan, and not Anakin, as they want Anakin with Palpatine to spy. Palpatine has set Grievous up for failure.
All Palpatine has to do is wait for Grievous to fall to Kenobi, and that will be it. When Anakin delivers the news to Palpatine that Kenobi has engaged Grievous, Palpatine knows now is the time to make his move on Anakin. He knows it is only a matter of time before Grievous falls, and that the Jedi will be coming for Palpatine to give up his power. So it is no coincidence when Anakin informs Palpatine of Obi Wan attacking Grievous that Palpatine now decides to tell Anakin that he is the Sith.
This is an awesome plan by Palpatine to initiate the final stage of his plan. He has played everyone perfectly, he has moved his pawns where he wanted them. He used the Jedi as pawns to help drive that wedge between the Council and Anakin, and when he felt it was all ready to pop, he just gives the Jedi Grievous's location. Once he has Anakin, well than it's Order 66, and sending Anakin to Mustafar, where Palpatine sent the Sep Leaders, to be executed and end the war quite easily.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Jan 12, 2020 17:41:32 GMT
A) Anakin's Birth- I know Lucas toyed with this idea, and in fact removed a line of dialogue that pretty much said that Palpatine created Anakin. I was never a big fan of this. I think of the saying evil begets evil. Basically, if Anakin is created by evil, than his choices are made for him in the grand scheme of things. I like it more that the Force created Anakin, and thus his choices were his own.
Well, it would now appear that its been confirmed by the Lucasfilm Story Group that Palpatine isn't behind Anakin's birth. I'm very pleased with this - I thought it was nice for the fans to be able to debate the mystery behind his conception, but ever since a particular comic came out a year or two ago, a large but vocal section of them have been incredibly arrogant and clingy in their conviction that the Sith Lord created him. The comic book was never meant to give them that certainty, and they could do well to head the wisdom of its writer: "The Dark is an unreliable narrator".
You're spot on about the implications were Palpatine behind it: a slippery slope to the death of Free Will itself.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Jan 13, 2020 11:09:29 GMT
I am wont to side with the perspective overall argued by tonyg. Or is it Tonyg? Or is it TonyG? Like, Tony Gangsta. Because my mind for whatever reason likens it exotically as Ton-yig. (I'm never certain whether I should capitalize grammatically proper screen handles that are presented otherwise. Whatever. I'm going lower case)Hence: A. Anakin's birthNo B. Anakin’s nightmares of ShmiNo C. The capture and torture of Shmi SkywalkerNope D. Anakin’s visions of Padmé dying in childbirthNo E. The death of PadméAnd no Palpatine is a literal wizard in his reality. A sorcerer. Of the above events however this grants him not the creation/control, but rather the (finer) perception. He is not influencing their outcomes; it is the outcomes that influences his stratagem—itself ever-fluid, as tonyg elaborates. Yet on the allusions to Shakespeare, perhaps such does indeed apply to Palpatine, just in a more roundabout fashion. Or maybe in a very limited, practical sense per his storied reality, for in addition to being a sorcerer, Palpatine is also an actor. Except, he's not so much an actor performing on a stage of his making and reciting his own script as he is an actor navigating the audience, the streets outside, the world at large ...but always and so perpetually using the thespian craft. And I don't just mean the obvious, either, playing in broad strokes the alter ego of a politician separate from a Sith Lord. It's deeper than that. Script or no script, staged or real, what do all actors do almost reflexively, instinctively? They "read the scene", so to speak. They read the immediate layout, the other people in the room. They gauge, and in turn play their part in real-time. Palpatine, then, is at once the ultimate 'game theory' strategist and the ultimate thespian ...with the added mystic powers of cognition that reach beyond mere sense-data. He doesn't need to be Prospero, just godd ol' Iago; beyond a general plot to upend the Republic and a general intent to ambush the Jedi, he doesn't need to mechanize every single event -- manage every single variable -- spanning a galaxy, just respond-and-reorientate organically by virtue of his exceptional, collective talents. Force prodigy Anakin's visions, of both Mom and Hottie, are first the result of his own emotional dependencies upon the two and by consequence the anxieties therein; the guilt of having left one years ago and, later, in its place, the fear of losing the other to the same devastating effect. Shmi's kidnapping is life on the John Fordian frontier (see: the slaughtering of Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru). It is something that would prove advantages to Palpatine yet, on its own, needs no further catalyst than the very extremes of a Star Wars existence. Storytelling requires drama, space opera requires space tragedy. As a conceit, Palpatine does not create this tragedy; he breathes it—like oxygen to his Machiavellian brain. And as for Anakin's very genesis and Padme's end demise, well, these mark the two most directly metatextual events of the Prequel Trilogy, where any one, literal in-universe explanation for either of which sorta defeats the purpose of Star Wars as anything more than a potboiler narrative; as anything aspiring towards high-romanticism. In other words, the idea that Palpatine or Plagueis through some Dark Side alchemy conjured Anakin into being is all rather, I dunno, two-dimensional. Such powers are referenced nebulously as a lure for Anakin and, for us, an open-ended thematic prospect of the Force as a perversion. Sure, it's neat to toy with an idea that connects aforesaid dots for the sake of geek-speculation but the PT -- Lucas' saga -- as presented is a symphonic work and an outward expression of meanings, not simply a 'fill-in-the-blanks' story puzzle for its own sake.
The immaculate conception of Anakin is meant chiefly to strike the chord of real historical theology & myth, invoking all manner of uniquely personal associations -- intellectual curiosity to outright spiritual investment -- from one individual member of the audience to the next. It's purpose is psychological; it's execution is space opera. This all goes twofold for Padme's departure, the ultimate gesture in classical melodrama. "Will" is mentioned in the scene, the loss of. Consider the significance of this, its full spectrum. Is it not enough that the Force itself is a ubiquitous, universal agency? Everyone in this world is connected to it, a part of it, Jedi or no. The Force is real, love is real: Is it not enough that Anakin's spiritual death constitutes a psychic blow so umbilically focused as to trigger Padme's physical death? The language of cinema certainly communicates as much during this sequence. To hell with Palpatine and whatever interstellar life-draining bullshit. That's for a CW show. This is Star Wars, the stuff of lofty ridiculous tokens. When your "heart breaks" in real life, you just get drunk or maybe binge on some ice cream—go to work the next day less than 100%. In a Star Wars movie? Volcanoes erupt, the Republic falls, Vader rises, a trilogy ends.
Remember, such a world of the Force and cosmic love is all too real for Padme; at one point, she asks Anakin to come back to it.
|
|
|
Post by maychild on Jan 13, 2020 22:05:06 GMT
I'm reminded here of the scene between Kevin Lomax (Keanu Reeves) and his dad, "John Milton" -- aka Satan (Al Pacino) in "The Devil's Advocate." Kevin, in denial of his own perfidy, accuses Milton of playing him, of putting him in various situations, of making other people lie. Milton roars, "I don't DO that, Kevin!" Really, he's telling the truth, or at least a form of it. He may have set certain things into motion directly, such as Kevin's conception, and he may have nudged things here and there so Kevin could get to where he was, but ultimately, Kevin had free choice, and he chose the self-serving (evil?) path, repeatedly, sacrificing anything in his way -- for example, his wife. Milton shouts at him, "I told you to take care of your wife...what did I say to you? WHAT WERE MY WORDS TO YOU? That maybe it was your time to lose." Kevin bellows, "LOSE? I DON'T LOSE! I WIN! I WIN! THAT'S MY JOB, THAT'S WHAT I DO!" Milton replies, with relative mildness, "I rest my case."
I think that's similar to the case with Palpatine. Lucas leaves pretty much everything open to interpretation, including the much-debated idea that he is Anakin's "father" -- that is, he set his conception into motion, not by seducing Shmi, but by manipulating the Force or the midichlorians or whatever. He plants seeds but is content to let them grow on their own, or mostly so -- he likes to nudge things along here and there, but he doesn't "make" anyone do anything. Maybe it's more intriguing for him that way.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Jan 14, 2020 11:40:18 GMT
Force prodigy Anakin's visions, of both Mom and Hottie, are first the result of his own emotional dependencies upon the two and by consequence the anxieties therein; Exactly! To shift the cause to Palpatine is to ignore not only what these movies are about, but also to dismiss the core problem with Anakin and what he needs to do to succeed. To let go of his fear and attachment. To pretend that it comes from Palpatine is to indulge the idea that by getting rid of Palpatine, he would get rid of his visions. That's not true. The visions he has are, in a way, the equivalent of the cave on Dagobah. What's in them? Only what he takes with him. Palpatine didn't plant fear in Anakin. He took advantage of the fear he had. There's a difference. It's also morally flawed. It promotes the idea that you can blame your fears (and problems) on somebody else, good person or bad, and use them as scapegoats to justify your actions. It's pure cowardice. Just like Anakin blaming Obi-Wan for what happened on Tatooine.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on Mar 12, 2020 19:57:51 GMT
Force prodigy Anakin's visions, of both Mom and Hottie, are first the result of his own emotional dependencies upon the two and by consequence the anxieties therein; Exactly! To shift the cause to Palpatine is to ignore not only what these movies are about, but also to dismiss the core problem with Anakin and what he needs to do to succeed. To let go of his fear and attachment. To pretend that it comes from Palpatine is to indulge the idea that by getting rid of Palpatine, he would get rid of his visions. That's not true. Let me take your own writing from elsewhere as a refutation. Palpatine's role is indeed critical:
Palpatine was right there to exploit it, but in my opinion, Anakin could easily have fallen to the dark side without his influence, but probably later than he did. He would still have been motivated by a desire to save Padme, anger, and hate. I disagree on this. It makes the character a hopeless case and I don't think that's what we should take away from that. I do think Anakin wouldn't have fallen without Palpatine tempting and pushing him in a certain direction, which means he still had room to grow.During Anakin's duel with Dooku, the latter says: "I sense great fear in you, Skywalker. You have hate, you have anger, but you don't use them." This is a testament to Anakin's (fragile) maturity and decision to do the right thing and follow the Jedi way. And we see that in key moments, Anakin would do the right thing had Palpatine not tempted him (execute Dooku, be on the Council and demand for the rank of Master, leave the Council chambers).
Very well said, Alex. The fall of the character is not inevitable.
It's also morally flawed. It promotes the idea that you can blame your fears (and problems) on somebody else, good person or bad, and use them as scapegoats to justify your actions. It's pure cowardice. Just like Anakin blaming Obi-Wan for what happened on Tatooine. Let me ask you this: do you think the child victims of psychological abuse who later experience severe trauma are also cowards? Just looking for a convenient scapegoat? Could have easily brushed it all off? Whatever about people in Star Wars being morally flawed, I think most of us would agree victim shaming certainly is.
|
|
|
Post by Alexrd on Mar 12, 2020 20:19:56 GMT
Let me ask you this: do you think the child victims of psychological abuse who later experience severe trauma are also cowards? No. Cowards are those that don't take responsibility and blame others for their own flaws and misdeeds. Anakin didn't lack rightful counsel. The Jedi offered him plenty. Anakin chose the wrong path, he chose to listen to Palpatine. Even when he knew deep down that it was wrong, he still chose to do it. That choice is his, no one else's. Palpatine didn't force him to anything. Nobody did. Palpatine seduced him, lied to him, but the choice remained Anakin's.
|
|
|
Post by eljedicolombiano on Apr 14, 2020 4:21:21 GMT
I don't think Palpatine was involved in any of the afromentioned events- the thing is, if he did, he would be too powerful of a villain, maybe not to the point of turning into Dr Evil as they made him in TROS, but it would still be too much imo.
Part of the thing that has to be made in fiction tales made with children in mind, is that no matter how powerful the villain is, he ultimately has a weakness that can be exploited, and they tend to be one of the two: either fear, or overconfidence. Palpatine's downfall comes down to his overconfidence, thinking that Luke is as vulnerable as Anakin, that the Ewoks are far too primitive to ever mount a serious threat, and that the Rebel Alliance fleet is simply no match to the firepower of the Death Star and the Imperial Armada. Well, it turns out, he never saw that his apprentice could turn against him to save his son, and that let to his own end.
Also, i'd like to add that during the PT, sure he has interest in Anakin, but he's not that interested. If Anakin survives the events of the Clone Wars, he will become Darth Vader, if he doesn't, he won't and someone else will take the place of Dooku. The guy at the end of the day, only really cares about his own skin.
|
|
|
Post by Moonshield on Apr 14, 2020 5:05:55 GMT
Five times "no".
Users of the force can feel emotions of each other. No more.
Also, I don't like theory of Padme's death by Palpatine's force. It is very stupid and senseless.
She was shocked by Vader's cruelty. She is in the last month, she married him, she's never seen him dark, also, the fault of the Republic, the strain of childbirth...
Seriously, don't you see why did she die?
|
|
|
Post by thephantomcalamari on Jun 16, 2020 19:50:54 GMT
I don't think Palpatine was involved in any of the afromentioned events- the thing is, if he did, he would be too powerful of a villain, maybe not to the point of turning into Dr Evil as they made him in TROS, but it would still be too much imo. Part of the thing that has to be made in fiction tales made with children in mind, is that no matter how powerful the villain is, he ultimately has a weakness that can be exploited, and they tend to be one of the two: either fear, or overconfidence. Palpatine's downfall comes down to his overconfidence, thinking that Luke is as vulnerable as Anakin, that the Ewoks are far too primitive to ever mount a serious threat, and that the Rebel Alliance fleet is simply no match to the firepower of the Death Star and the Imperial Armada. Well, it turns out, he never saw that his apprentice could turn against him to save his son, and that let to his own end. Also, i'd like to add that during the PT, sure he has interest in Anakin, but he's not that interested. If Anakin survives the events of the Clone Wars, he will become Darth Vader, if he doesn't, he won't and someone else will take the place of Dooku. The guy at the end of the day, only really cares about his own skin. I've always said that Palpatine accumulates and maintains his power through temptation and fear. His physical power, though formidable, is ultimately not enough to overcome the power of the human spirit. He can only dominate others if those others allow him to dominate them. This is evident throughout the prequel trilogy in the way Palpatine manipulates events; he never truly makes anything happen himself, he merely whispers in ears and dangles dark enticements. He could have been stopped at many points throughout the trilogy if someone had simply said "No" to what he was offering. He would have been rendered powerless, in spite of all his years of training in the unnatural powers of the dark side. This is how Luke Skywalker finally defeats him: He's perhaps the first person to truly say "No" to him. At that point, it doesn't matter that Luke is no match for the Emperor physically and will almost certainly be killed by him. Luke has already won. By rejecting evil, the forces of destiny have turned in his favor and the conditions have been created for the fulfillment of prophecy. Luke's personal victory, and the physical overthrow of evil at the hands of the Chosen One, though playing out in the material world, take on a greater meaning in the world of spirit. They become a victory for all beings, for all time. That's the power of prophecy, which is infinitely more resilient than all of the carefully laid plans and grand technological constructions of ambitious men like Palpatine.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Aug 20, 2020 22:39:18 GMT
Another one I'd add is; how much of the series of events which led to Kenobi discovering the clone army on Kamino was cooked up by Palpatine?
He obviously wanted Kenobi and Skywalker assigned to the protection of Senator Amidala, but what about the rest?
I had always been neutral and centered on the fence about this question. I mean, at the end of the day, all he really needs is for Kamino to contact the Republic/Jedi and to tell Dooku to start a war. I liked the idea that the movie was made that much more intriguing by through virtue of his skills and good intentions, Kenobi ended up serendipitously helping facilitate Palpatine's scheme even more fortuitously than he'd planned. And I like how Lucas leaves many things delightfully ambiguous, like Anakin's conception...
However, I was recently reminded that in the AotC commentary, Lucas states Palpatine wanted Kenobi to discover Kamino, which helped sway my stance. But again, how much of Obi-Wan's trek to Kamino was designed by Sidious?
There are a lot of events and variables: -Padme using herself as bait. -Kenobi & Anakin chasing and catching Zam. (Not in their mandate). -Taking Zam outside where Jango could shoot her, with a Kamino saber dart, mind you. (She was about to say "Jango Fett" though, so they might've gotten her to spill the beans). -Kenobi knowing someone who'd know where the dart is from. -Someone figuring out the planet should still be there, despite the records not showing it.
Which leads me to a second question: did Palpatine want Kenobi to discover the droid foundry and overhear the Separatist leaders on Geonosis?
RotJ set a precedent with everything going according to Palpatine's plan, as he echoes at the end of AotC, he even revealed that it was he who allowed the Rebels to learn of the location of the new Death Star. So how much can we apply the goings on of AotC to this?
|
|
|
Post by mikeximus on Aug 24, 2020 19:45:53 GMT
Another one I'd add is; how much of the series of events which led to Kenobi discovering the clone army on Kamino was cooked up by Palpatine? He obviously wanted Kenobi and Skywalker assigned to the protection of Senator Amidala, but what about the rest? I had always been neutral and centered on the fence about this question. I mean, at the end of the day, all he really needs is for Kamino to contact the Republic/Jedi and to tell Dooku to start a war. I liked the idea that the movie was made that much more intriguing by through virtue of his skills and good intentions, Kenobi ended up serendipitously helping facilitate Palpatine's scheme even more fortuitously than he'd planned. And I like how Lucas leaves many things delightfully ambiguous, like Anakin's conception... However, I was recently reminded that in the AotC commentary, Lucas states Palpatine wanted Kenobi to discover Kamino, which helped sway my stance. But again, how much of Obi-Wan's trek to Kamino was designed by Sidious? There are a lot of events and variables: -Padme using herself as bait. -Kenobi & Anakin chasing and catching Zam. (Not in their mandate). -Taking Zam outside where Jango could shoot her, with a Kamino saber dart, mind you. (She was about to say "Jango Fett" though, so they might've gotten her to spill the beans). -Kenobi knowing someone who'd know where the dart is from. -Someone figuring out the planet should still be there, despite the records not showing it. Which leads me to a second question: did Palpatine want Kenobi to discover the droid foundry and overhear the Separatist leaders on Geonosis? RotJ set a precedent with everything going according to Palpatine's plan, as he echoes at the end of AotC, he even revealed that it was he who allowed the Rebels to learn of the location of the new Death Star. So how much can we apply the goings on of AotC to this? I think that the biggest issue at hand that a lot of people tend to forget is that force users have the ability to see, at least partially, the future. That is the real take-a-way from ROTJ with Palpatine, which acts as the final piece of the puzzle for how Palpatine was able to do what he did in the Prequels: So it has always been my opinion that a great deal of what we see in TPM, AOTC, and ROTS is very much Palpatine's plan in action with very few deviations, because he is able to see at least some of the future, and is able to interweave his plan in what he sees. He of course doesn't set up Padme surviving the assassination attempt at the beginning of AOTC, but, he sees it, and knows it will happen, and he can take advantage of that to insert his plan and get it moving. He knows all the players, he knows all the pieces, he sees the whole board, where as no one else does. I think people tend to forget Palpatine's ability of foresight, and concentrate on the unknown details as if they are a problem for him, when they wouldn't be. What seems like unexpected factors to us or deviations from his plan, really aren't because the people watching the movie forget that because they don't know something doesn't mean he isn't aware of it. I think where Palpatine has issues with his ability to see the future is much in the same way with what we saw with Luke in ESB and even Palpatine in ROTS. "Always in motion the future is". To me, it seems that seeing the future gets tough when it comes to free will and free choice of individuals. Yoda could not see the fate of Han and Leia because their fate rested on the free will and free choice of Lando. Lando had to make a choice, and that choice could have gone either way, and that is why Yoda could not see their fate. In Revenge Of The Sith, Palpatine is not sure what Anakin will do when it comes to making his choice. So Palpatine sets up this fake kidnapping so Palpatine can see for himself where Anakin is at when it comes to his abilities and mindset. Once Palpatine sees that Anakin is open to using the Dark Side and has reached a certain level of power, he's more comfortable in moving forward with his overall plan. Finally in Return of the Jedi, Palpatine has become so arrogant about how things have worked out for him, he forgets that there is still a choice for Anakin. While he foresees Luke seeking out Vader, he gets messed up in the details surrounding the free choices that are being made. So he lets his guard down, and in doing so forgets to take into account, or at least feels Vader is too far gone for any free will or free choice to have an impact on his plan. So when it comes to Palpatine's plan in AOTC, it is very much the Hansel and Gretel plan of leaving breadcrumbs for the Jedi to follow. A lot of what we see is his doing because he knows ahead of time how certain events will transpire...
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Mar 14, 2022 22:29:17 GMT
Did Palpatine know about the Prophesy of the Chosen One? Did he convert Anakin knowing (thinking) that it would then eliminate his one threat?
|
|
|
Post by tonyg on Jul 27, 2022 17:15:09 GMT
Another one I'd add is; how much of the series of events which led to Kenobi discovering the clone army on Kamino was cooked up by Palpatine? He obviously wanted Kenobi and Skywalker assigned to the protection of Senator Amidala, but what about the rest? I had always been neutral and centered on the fence about this question. I mean, at the end of the day, all he really needs is for Kamino to contact the Republic/Jedi and to tell Dooku to start a war. I liked the idea that the movie was made that much more intriguing by through virtue of his skills and good intentions, Kenobi ended up serendipitously helping facilitate Palpatine's scheme even more fortuitously than he'd planned. And I like how Lucas leaves many things delightfully ambiguous, like Anakin's conception... However, I was recently reminded that in the AotC commentary, Lucas states Palpatine wanted Kenobi to discover Kamino, which helped sway my stance. But again, how much of Obi-Wan's trek to Kamino was designed by Sidious? There are a lot of events and variables: -Padme using herself as bait. -Kenobi & Anakin chasing and catching Zam. (Not in their mandate). -Taking Zam outside where Jango could shoot her, with a Kamino saber dart, mind you. (She was about to say "Jango Fett" though, so they might've gotten her to spill the beans). -Kenobi knowing someone who'd know where the dart is from. -Someone figuring out the planet should still be there, despite the records not showing it. Which leads me to a second question: did Palpatine want Kenobi to discover the droid foundry and overhear the Separatist leaders on Geonosis? RotJ set a precedent with everything going according to Palpatine's plan, as he echoes at the end of AotC, he even revealed that it was he who allowed the Rebels to learn of the location of the new Death Star. So how much can we apply the goings on of AotC to this? In the same commentary Ewan said something like: Anakin and Padme are going to these romantic places on Naboo and Obi Wan is going Dick Tracy mode (i.e. playing Jedi detective). I think this is the main "thread" in his subplot: can he be capable to discover the truth. While Palpatine would only win if Obi Wan discovers the Army and not the other way (the Kaminoans contacting the Republic saying that the order is ready) he couldn't know that Zam would fail or Obi Wan could know someone who have been on Kamino. Let's see how many opportunities we have here: first, Zam succeeds in killing Padme and is captured by the Jedi. In this case the main goal of Palpatine is achieved (the Military Creation act would be accepted) and also the Jedi would follow Jango Fett. But is also possible that Zam wouldn't be captured (no matter if she succeeds or not) so the relation to Jango Fett wouldn't be revealed. Is not that Palpatine wouldn't come with some new idea (he surely would figure out something that suits him at least partially), my point is that he didn't manipulate every step of Obi Wan. What Obi Wan pass through is the classic case of the detective: he is always one step behind the villians as they know the whole truth and he still has to discover it (if he could do that at all). That's why his journey looks so realistic, at least for me.
|
|