|
Post by thephantomcalamari on Dec 5, 2020 13:20:06 GMT
'Frames' trailer @ 0:34This moment from the 'Frames' trailer was eye-opening for me. It's Lucas casually acknowledging the powerful essence of juxtaposition between shots in the films. And as skgai1 suggests, the power of juxtaposition doesn't stop at shots within the films but also seems to exist quite intentionally between the films themselves. Worlds next to worlds.
Also, Lucas often distinctively uses the word "design" in talking about his films. It really stands out to me and reflects his very deliberate approach to filmmaking. Little left to chance.
I own a that. I can it see right now from where I'm typing, sitting on my shelf. Finally set aside some money and purchased a copy a couple-three years back, right around the release of The Last Jedi, if memory serves. It wasn't cheap, to be sure, because it isn't cheap: the volume is an achievement in 'collectors edition' of the highest order. And I'm not someone with a wall set aside for Star Wars merch, either; what few random featurette/RPG books or knick-knacks I own are what I've retained from childhood or picked up here and there mostly by whim happenstance. But this was something personal from Lucas -- the filmmaker -- himself. Something aimed entirely to contract his eye as a conjurer of cinema via a choice arrangement of specific visual mementos. Oddly, kind of a 'head shot' resume for a director, if you will. I've only looked it over a handful of times since I first got it. I really like to savor what's there and let it sink in, particularly leading up to when I revisit the movies on an annual basis.
I'm bragging but, to hell with it... this thing warrants a brag.
I really regret not picking this up back when it first came out. Like you said, it's basically impossible to acquire now without having to take out a mortgage. Oh well...someday....
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jan 18, 2021 21:20:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Mar 16, 2021 0:45:56 GMT
A teeny, tiny addition here. I was just re-reading this thread, or the opening post, and something there struck me: But keeping exclusively with ROTJ and the premise of the thread: ROTJ is really the installment where the prequels begin to poke through beyond the horizon, especially with respect to the tragic circumstances between the "holy triad" of Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Padme. We have Obi-Wan for the first time admitting (on some level) that he failed with Anakin and that he consequently doomed the galaxy to tyranny (cut line that I wish had been retained: "My pride has had terrible consequences for the galaxy"), while Luke echoes Qui-Gon in a number of respects, intuits that Leia is his sister, echoes Padme's insistence that there is "still good" in Anakin, and even utters his name for the first time in his own trilogy. Even Vader obliquely references Padme in the wistful line: "Obi-Wan once thought as you do" (can be read as a reference to the climactic events on Mustafar). There is also that discussion between Luke and Leia concerning their "real" mother, suggesting some gain in importance for Padme's role in the story (though not yet named), and Leia furnishes us with a description of Padme that the PT most certainly follows up on: "She was very beautiful. Kind... but sad." At some point in TPM, Qui-Gon (and Obi-Wan, maybe separately) intuits that Padme is the real Queen. Many prequel fans note that Qui-Gon appears to be teasing Padme about her concealed identity when she objects to them trusting their fate to a boy they hardly know. As he's entering Watto's shop, he turns back to her with a conspiratorial or mocking glance after reassuring her, "The Queen doesn't need to know." Later, when they're about to ascend in that observation tower at the start of the podrace, he gets right in her face after she scolds him for being reckless, baldly asserting, "The Queen trusts my judgement, young handmaiden. You should, too." Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan also share a knowing glance when Padme outs herself as the Queen in front of Boss Nass and her entourage. Luke intuiting that Leia is his sister is therefore a neat little echo of his Jedi "grandfather", you might say, outsmarting Padme right around the time that Anakin, his father, was discovered on that same backwater planet they both grew up on (and which Qui-Gon came dangerously close to stranding everyone on when he bet everything on Anakin). Leia's own ability to recall Padme -- still hotly-debated to this day amongst fans -- maybe now has more grounding as well. If Luke is Qui-Gon, or a "connection trace" of him, then Leia is Padme, or a "connection trace" of her. Platonic shadows on the homestead dome of the OT (or the "mundus" ball of the six-movie saga). Thus, Luke senses Padme when he gets "Padme" (Leia) to reveal her "identity" to him. He tugs on that rope and finds a glimmer of Padme ("images and feelings") at the end of it. In another light, Luke has "no memory" of Padme in a mirror of Anakin suppressing the memory of her -- in overseeing the father (Anakin), he undersees the mother. Luke is so attached to the innate good of Anakin that he needs other eyes to report consciously on the mother. No Force user can see it all. The Force summons people into groups and bands -- little symbiont circles -- in order that they may know each other and the universe better. The same applies to the Star Wars films (and conversation spaces established to discuss them!). The films are sustained and deepened by "living together for mutual advantage". Jedi/Menace. Empire/Clones. Hope/Sith. Just one set of endless configurations. A tapestry of rich interleaving.
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Apr 3, 2021 12:35:01 GMT
Yes. A number of people argue that Leia shouldn't be able to have images and feelings of Padmé through the Force. (?) And furthermore, they complain that if Leia can then Luke should be able to as well.
But I see Luke and Leia as a kind of yin/yang. Each complimenting the other. Both carrying traits of their parents in a symbiotic mix & match way. In this particular case, Luke carries Padmé’s ability to see the good in Anakin, and Leia able to possess shades and tones of who Padmé was.
They are twins after all, that's often how that works in fairy tales.
|
|
|
Post by Anthony on Apr 10, 2021 21:51:58 GMT
Interesting take. In my view, TESB is the most "prequel-ish" of the three, especially because of Anakin/Vader's active role and the presence of a beautiful high-tech planet.
|
|
|
Post by Seeker of the Whills on May 30, 2021 17:51:32 GMT
Interesting take. In my view, TESB is the most "prequel-ish" of the three, especially because of Anakin/Vader's active role and the presence of a beautiful high-tech planet. To me, ANH feels the most prequel-like as it's all Lucas. It's got a fast pace and it's "always on the move".
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Sept 26, 2021 19:28:55 GMT
Interesting take. In my view, TESB is the most "prequel-ish" of the three, especially because of Anakin/Vader's active role and the presence of a beautiful high-tech planet. Interesting take. In my view, TESB is the most "prequel-ish" of the three, especially because of Anakin/Vader's active role and the presence of a beautiful high-tech planet. To me, ANH feels the most prequel-like as it's all Lucas. It's got a fast pace and it's "always on the move". Nice perspectives -- and proof that there is nothing more complicated or variegated than perception. Last year, in the first week of my thread, inspired by a reply of Subtext Mining's, I actually listed two-dozen thematic, plot, and visual links between TESB and the PT ( Reply #7). ANH certainly has a lot in common with the PT, of course. Indeed, pieces of the prequels can be found in all three of the original movies, which is hardly original or a surprise revelation by itself, but certainly worth noting, because the OT is like a basic blueprint for the PT, establishing the "grammar" of Star Wars and a good deal of its thematic "way" of doing things -- and, of course, the six films are meant to stand as one total expression. However, I think the rhyming aspect of the saga only really comes into proper focus in ROTJ, and only in ROTJ is the Emperor, the grand weaver of illusions, shown in corporeal form -- helping to set the stage for his story, as much as Anakin's, in the PT. Then you have everything else that ROTJ is doing -- not to mention the "how" of its doing. This was a primary element of its makeup I tried to put across in my opening post with the following quote: Well, the other night, in the process of drafting up another reply in another thread, I read back through GL's interview with Rolling Stone in 1983, and came upon the following remark: Further down in the same interview, Lucas adds: He even looks forward -- a bit too optimistically, as it turned out -- to making the prequels back-to-back: Talk about hurrying your PhD! That "cheaper way" Lucas anticipated existing was, ultimately, to lean heavily into the nascent world of digital filmmaking, which enabled him to realise things that, in his own words in another interview, would have been "literally impossible" without digital technology. ROTJ wasn't just the final piece of the OT puzzle. It set the stage for the prequels: a much deeper puzzle. And the experience of making it allowed Lucas to refine his artistic expression and complete his original Star Wars screenplay/outline (echoing Lucas' general evocation of "that dumb screenplay" in the same interview). Perhaps it was getting to the finish line with his original concept for Star Wars that, after the initial burnout went away, created a hunger in him to return to the world he had created with the films we know as the prequels. He had done the impossible once and he was poised to do it again. The engrossing, deep-dish backstory was finally ready to be told.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Dec 14, 2021 17:56:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 20, 2022 2:28:12 GMT
Joe, in all honesty, this has nothing to do with my thread.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on Jun 20, 2022 2:42:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 20, 2022 12:46:31 GMT
But you're speculating based on an offshoot Disney series. My thread is mainly designed to elucidate how ROTJ served as a blueprint for the PT; and yes, even the ST films. In other words, I am interested -- and trying to make others interested -- in how much of ROTJ is baked into the DNA of the Saga entries. How it, in effect, made the Saga into, well: a saga.
|
|
|
Post by Darkslayer on Jun 26, 2022 4:32:14 GMT
Just rewatched this. I am a Prequel baby and feel blessed to have seen both TPM and ROTS in the theater, but you all have no idea how badly I wish I could have seen this gem in the theater. One of my favorite movies ever.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jun 26, 2022 4:38:19 GMT
Just rewatched this. I am a Prequel baby and feel blessed to have seen both TPM and ROTS in the theater, but you all have no idea how badly I wish I could have seen this gem in the theater. One of my favorite movies ever. I saw ANH and TESB in theaters when the SEs came out, but never made it to Return of the Jedi. It was my fault too. I saw TESB a second time instead of ROTJ, cuz my friend had never seen TESB before and I didn't want the Vader reveal to be spoiled. Well, he didn't care anyway, and slept through half the movie. Oh well, one day they'll put it back in theaters.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 26, 2022 13:40:07 GMT
Just rewatched this. I am a Prequel baby and feel blessed to have seen both TPM and ROTS in the theater, but you all have no idea how badly I wish I could have seen this gem in the theater. One of my favorite movies ever. I saw ANH and TESB in theaters when the SEs came out, but never made it to Return of the Jedi. It was my fault too. I saw TESB a second time instead of ROTJ, cuz my friend had never seen TESB before and I didn't want the Vader reveal to be spoiled. Well, he didn't care anyway, and slept through half the movie. Oh well, one day they'll put it back in theaters. You know, strangely, I saw ANH and TESB on their SE release, but never saw ROTJ, either. I'm not actually sure why. I was quite young at the time and I guess my parents didn't want to take me for some reason. ROTJ is the only one of the six Lucas films I've never seen on the big screen.
|
|
|
Post by Somny on Jun 26, 2022 14:43:50 GMT
I saw ANH and TESB in theaters when the SEs came out, but never made it to Return of the Jedi. It was my fault too. I saw TESB a second time instead of ROTJ, cuz my friend had never seen TESB before and I didn't want the Vader reveal to be spoiled. Well, he didn't care anyway, and slept through half the movie. Oh well, one day they'll put it back in theaters. You know, strangely, I saw ANH and TESB on their SE release, but never saw ROTJ, either. I'm not actually sure why. I was quite young at the time and I guess my parents didn't want to take me for some reason. ROTJ is the only one of the six Lucas films I've never seen on the big screen. Weird. I was 11 at the time and saw both ANH and TESB on the first weekends of their SE release. However, I would see ROTJ weeks after it debuted in theaters. There was definitely muted fanfare and excitement among the company I was with for the final installment. And to add insult to injury, my ROTJ screening took place in one of the smaller auditoriums of the cineplex we saw it at. Short-changed! This lapse may have had something to do with a last-minute change to the SE release schedule, IIRC. I believe ROTJ was pushed back to give ANH and TESB more breathing room given their wildly successful roll-outs.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on Jun 26, 2022 15:44:17 GMT
Exactly, i was all ready for ROTJ, and I remember hearing on the school bus that ROTJ was being delayed by a week, and then it kinda felt like, well, if they're just gonna stay in the theater, what's the hurry... And stuff just happened. After it left theaters, I had ANOTHER chance to see ROTJ in a drive-in movie theater that showed movies a few months late, but right around that time, my mom and I were in a car accident right outside the drive-in on way to see a movie (it could have been ROTJ, not sure), so I think that may have played a role in the decision to skip it.
|
|
|
Post by Somny on Jun 26, 2022 15:46:41 GMT
I have to be honest. My enthusiasm for seeing ROTJ in theaters at the time was primarily hinged upon an expectation of seeing a CG Rancor inserted into the film.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on Jun 26, 2022 16:43:03 GMT
I'm like Luke: I have "no memory" of any gap in the release schedule between ANH and TESB and ROTJ. I do remember being uncomfortably close to the screen for ANH. It was in a THX auditorium and there was no need to be so near to the front. But the seat numbers were printed on the ticket and you were meant to sit where you were assigned. Such a weird situation. For the screening of TESB, at a different cinema, I remember the sound being pretty loud, even though I think we were sat much farther back. That particular place always blasted the sound out. It was also where I saw TPM with a Star Wars-loving friend from school (coincidentally called Luke). Oddly, we didn't associate with each other much at school, and that was the one time we purposely met up after arranging to go see it. I still remember going to his large house and ringing the door to call for him to leave to head to the cinema. We were sixteen and had just finished secondary/high school. Hard to believe that was twenty-three years ago.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on Jun 26, 2022 20:28:07 GMT
I saw Return of the Jedi in theaters...in 1985, upon it's re-release.
And later the SE as well. *fist-pump*
|
|
|
Post by Subtext Mining on Jun 27, 2022 9:10:17 GMT
Not so fast. *as Ingram reaches for the pile of chips.
I saw RotJ in theatres in 1983.
And the the Special Edition releases in 1997, I saw ANH about 15 times, ESB about 12 times, and RotJ about 5 times. I still have the ticket stubs somewhere, I'd have to check, but these estimates are on the conservative side.
|
|