|
Post by Ingram on May 30, 2022 4:40:52 GMT
I suppose an explanation is due. Leia, Bail, the whole Organa venue, Alderaan—scrap it. The whole thing. It's called Obi-Wan Kenobi, not Obi-Wan Kenobi and One of the Skywalkers that is NOT a Main Saga Story, to be Clear: Just Something We're doing for TV. The little actress/character of Leia and the story setup surrounding her is all, I guess, innocuously affable, nor have I any canonical mindset that would take seriously a logical or dramatic continuity breach with Lucas' trilogies, even if the revisionism here is indeed awkward ("General Kenobi. Years ago you came to NeoTokyo and rescued my ass from Flea."). I'll tell you why I like this big wrenching plot device. Well, there are two reasons: i) It shows Obi-Wan offering Jedi protection to both Skywalker twins. Leia isn't abandoned and left to the mere mortals to look after. Perhaps Obi-Wan even made an error in thinking he could focus solely on Luke in ROTS: "I will take the child and watch over him." Extreme Luke-as-surrogate-for-Anakin focus. He commits the same fallacy in TESB when he mournfully declares that Luke was their last hope, only for Yoda to correct him: "No, there is another." The film then cuts to Leia pacing about in Cloud City. This new development ties him in more powerfully with the twins and means Leia isn't ignored. It's worth remembering that George Lucas himself probably didn't explicitly set up Luke and Leia as twins when writing ANH, even though it makes a heap of sense by ROTJ that they are. Obi-Wan must honour his debt to Padme by watching out for her two children -- who, of course, are Anakin's kids, too. The SW galaxy is a rough place and it's good to see Obi-Wan stepping into action and seeing Leia beyond being present at her birth. ii) It brings balance to Leia's story and fills in gaps in her characterisation. The prequels treated us to kid Anakin. In the OT, we see Luke before he is anything special. And Rey, if we're including her, is already pretty adept and gets swept up with various iconic legends from practically the first day we see her. Leia, on the other hand, is somewhat thinly sketched by comparison. Lucas essentially built his trilogies around boy wonders. We see their abodes, the people and places they call home, their daily grind for bread, but we never get any of this for Leia. Leia just enters the narrative effectively fully formed. Sure, she has flaws, weaknesses, but she already occupies a high station in life, and any hope of seeing her in a more relaxed or early setting comfortable and familiar to her is erased when the Empire blows up Alderaan. It's nice that this series is finally turning Leia into more of a three-dimensional entity with an early life history. Like Luke, she's a person that matters. By this, one might say the series has adopted the same general mindset as did the Sequel Trilogy in rounding Leia deeper into the macro-storyline as a Child of the Force proportionate to Luke's hero journey. Okay. You're arguing what can be considered reasonable storytelling expansions that supports said content; I'm thinking more about form. Because, cripes, is this Skywalker saga myth getting crowded. It's starting to feel less like pop-myth altogether and more like, well, shit...TV. I like figurative parameters of fading darkness (literal darkness that surrounds a movie theater screen), the myth itself selective in grand movements and narrated with brevity. Anachronistic, perhaps. This show like the rest of Disney-era definitely leans on modern sensibilities where every character is to be itemized and accessorized respectively with popular conventions. It's not unlike all those straight-to-video sequels to animated classics Disney would crank out.
I always liked Princess Leia precisely because she was that foreign -- and fully formed -- object thrown into a boys' adventure and throughout the OT would repeatedly play-or-break the rules to her persuasion. Luke, Han and Lando are all caught-off guard by her at one point or another and often more than once. I wouldn't call her any less dimensional opposite Luke the moment they meet aboard the Death Star on forward; the latter is simply the lead vehicle for larger thematic through-lines.
As for the hologram recording: Notice that Leia starts off the recording in ANH by speaking in a formal, solicitous tone: "General Kenobi, years ago you served my father in the Clone Wars." But at the end of the recording, she manifests a gentle, pleading tone and is far more personal and direct: "Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You're my only hope." The former is terse formality, the latter is an intimate request: a soft-voiced prayer charged with emotion. One is impersonal and vague: misdirection. The latter speaks to a more personal connection to Obi-Wan. No doubt, though, fans are going to flag up the "General Kenobi" line for years to come. That's okay, I guess -- fans will be fans. But I'm fine with it. I should say I literally rewatched the message scene just now in Obi-Wan's hovel and, in my opinion, it fits in perfectly with this miniseries. Yes, this too is reasonable. Or at least it can be made reasonable. I get that. I wouldn't say it fits perfectly but it's certainly not any kind of glaring incongruence either. I was only noting the parody potential to this level of constant and seemingly open-ended retooling. We're definitely now in the realm where nothing in Lucas' Star Wars is being left to chance, to its own finite premises or oblique impressions. Every page is to have an appendix. It's "magical". "A little cop show vignette". As Yoda would say: "Revealed your opinion is." Yes, if this were a sleek, humble affair, that might be all the series would be. But I completely understand them wanting to pad this into something more. More is more, then. "Revealed your opinion is" *searches for winking Yoda gif, finds none*I disagree, too, that Tatooine is long past its expiration date. Tatooine is certainly not Naboo or Coruscant, let's get that straight. But there's plenty of poetry about the place. I like the idea that in desolation, you can find salvation. Tatooine has always had an epic magic about it. I should have clarified, I mostly speaking in the context of these Disney+ series, all of them spending no small amount of time there. Or maybe it's a little radical and almost John Cage-like that they should dare to spend an episode focusing on a lost Obi-Wan just keeping his head down. But look, that's not all they're doing. The episode also draws a strong contrast between Obi-Wan's dissipated existence on a backwater planet and Leia's colourful, playful defiance in the paradise of Alderaan. An old-before-his-time, decaying man in the middle of nowhere, just trudging along, and a young, whimsical girl, running off into the trees and dreaming of a bigger universe in her little magical kingdom. A real duotone contrast. I've always said that Star Wars is all about those epic contrasts. This particular contrast made the first episode an absolute delight. I won't say there wasn't a bit of lethargy in the Obi-Wan stretches, but I think it mostly went in the episode's favour. I also think Obi-Wan's reactions and the passing details of his world do say something about the character. The Grand Inquisitor makes that little speech right at the beginning about the Jedi's compassion leaving a trail. It sets up the idea that Obi-Wan is unable to completely suppress his real self, even in his anonymous, beige-world existence. The little details matter. At this juncture I can only regress to my foundational argument. In this very thread, now 26 pages in, we could be hotly debating per the latest movie series the merits of characters and story developments from any new and effectively removed saga arc elsewhere in the Star Wars universe. Instead, we're debating the merits of Princess Leia: The Mattel Years and Obi-Wan sleeping in a cave. It's not exactly lighting up my Christmas tree. I appreciate the nod to John Cage-like experimentalism, but I get no such reverb as this sorta thing just feels very much the norm of long-form television. And I recognize the scenes on Tatooine do indeed say something about the character. My contention is that it is done outside and at the expense of a leaner moving plot, and that Part II of the series thus far did a better job of such for reasons detailed in my previous posts. Her past with who? I never said Reva has a past with Obi-Wan. On the contrary: If she did, that would constitute the beginnings of an explanation. You say she's a "career woman" and that's that. If that explanation suffices for you, that's okay. Certainly, that might be what they're going with. Although that reduces her to something of a simplistic feminist archetype. No reason to put that past Disney, of course. I just feel there needs to be a bit more of an explication of her psyche and her motives. Not just anyone becomes an Inquisitor, after all. I like my women hot messes.
|
|
|
Post by Samnz on May 30, 2022 7:51:48 GMT
Yeah, as crooked as his rationalisation may have been, J.J. Abrams had a point that there's nothing quite like natural sunlight in a real desert environment. Except for the very end of ROTS, Tatooine was always a real place in the Lucas films. Well, fake-real, but you get my meaning. There were sets built and even a very decent miniature for the Mos Espa Grand Arena. As impressive as the new technology is, doing it all in "The Volume" is kind of a copout and a slur against the chimerical beauty of the Star Wars Saga. But, I dunno... It's television? I let them off a bit? I ask myself: "Does this look better than anything on TV ten years ago?" And I think, in many ways, the answer is "yes". Good enough for me, provided there's some decent cinematography and a reasonably artistic eye at work. I haven't spoiled myself on the other Disney shows. I come to Obi-Wan as a virgin. Wait, let me start that again: I have starting watching this new series almost entirely innocent of the other shows. Nothing to taint the experience for me. You're right on both accounts. There is something about a location that can't be captured otherwise just as there are locations that can't be realized without visual effects and Lucas was actually very good at finding a balance between location shooting when it was beneficial while not limiting himself to the locations of the world we live in. I'm actually being extra critical concerning the Disney productions on purpose, because of their dirty "real desert" anti-PT marketing ploy when TFA was made and released. Lucas actually went to a desert and now their marketing machine suddenly treats "The Volume" as the second coming, although it's got nothing to do with a "real desert". The neverending expanses of sand in those other shows was a huge deterrent for me. TFA-bad or worse (TFA's most striking environment, or where the most interesting stuff happens, is Takodana, a forest/lake world). There's only so many ways you can shoot a desert; and, even then, not all of those ways are accessible to limited minds. I don't mind Tatooine or sand planets, but please, only do it when the story calls for that -- don't say "we need sand planets" and then contort the story around your stupid desire. And yes, Alderaan seemed like it was the way Lucas would have depicted it, had he gone into television like Disney have. They may have cheated a bit and gone for slightly more of a Cloud City look, however. I don't care too much. It's just that we don't see interiors in ROTS (or, of course, ANH), but what's shown implies quite a different design aesthetic for the inside. But it works like a dream here. So Flash Gordon! Most prequel world by far? I think what The Mandalorian does really well is that it feels like just an ordinary day in the GFFA. It's a simple man making his way in the universe and on that path, he gets to meet some key players from the Saga and Lucasverse. In that sense, being just that (a simple man, an ordinary day), it does kind of work pretty well and the desert focus isn't a big problem. Not yet, at least. Samnz She remembers through the Force I know and I've always loved the romantic view that Padmé passed on a bit of herself to each of her children. Leia memorized images and feelings of her dying mother, Luke inherited his mother's last thoughts and convictions ("There is good in him."). It's not spelled out on screen, though, and people being as stupid and literal as they are have whined about that "plot hole" for years, so I could see them giving it a try to "explain" it in whatever way. Jesus Christ, there are actually people (read: fanboys) who think Obi-Wan was referring to Satine in the conversation with little Leia in Part II. I mean, for heavens sake, Padmé exists. She was one of the main characters in the PT, not a minor character in a spin-off cartoon to the prequels.
I'll gladly defend TCW wherever I can, I'm a true fan of it, but Obi-Wan is definitely not referring to a long gone, very brief romance he had before Episode I (ie 30 odd years ago). He's referring to his bloody friend, the wife of his best friend, the deceased mother of the child beside him. How more obvious can it get? Why is it people think every reference has to be a 4-dimensional riddle like in The Matrix? This is Star Wars, it never seeks to be unnecessarily complicated. Does the director have to spell it out to you? If you believe Satine is more important in Star Wars than Padmé, then you need to get your head examined.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to return to Reddit to remind everyone who Padmé was... I just don't get it. Why does Padmé get such kind of a treatment? Just because she hasn't been perfect as a human being? I always thought she was a great character - actually one of the best - and I liked how Lucas didn't write her as a carbon-copy of Leia while still giving them similarities. So I finished the first episode... Good but not great- I think if there is one thing that I find lacking from these Disney plus live action shows is the pace. Star Wars was always characterized by a fast paced, yet direct and clear storytelling. Shame this didn't see the light as a film, as it was originally intended. I agree that there is a tendency these days to take an easier path with making tv series' instead of movies, which is not always a good thing (especially when the show is serialized). The Mandalorian has a fairly procedural approach and that works quite well as a series, but there many shows that simply drag a thin story to length and it doesn't do the storytelling any favour. I think many filmmakers delude themselves by saying a tv series offers more time to tell a story (which is technically right, if done right) when they are probably more afraid of being tasked to tell the same story and character arc with less time. Of course, studios are also more inclined to go for a series nowadays because there's a lot less risk involved. But yes, there is definitely something about a well-made movie with good editing and pacing. Overall, I’m having a lot of fun. It’s hard to compare this to a film, but I’m happy with the direction it’s going and while it may not be canon to Lucas’s personal saga, I have no hard time believing this to be a great companion piece like a well-written EU story. That's my approach too.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 8:15:57 GMT
I'll tell you why I like this big wrenching plot device. Well, there are two reasons: i) It shows Obi-Wan offering Jedi protection to both Skywalker twins. Leia isn't abandoned and left to the mere mortals to look after. Perhaps Obi-Wan even made an error in thinking he could focus solely on Luke in ROTS: "I will take the child and watch over him." Extreme Luke-as-surrogate-for-Anakin focus. He commits the same fallacy in TESB when he mournfully declares that Luke was their last hope, only for Yoda to correct him: "No, there is another." The film then cuts to Leia pacing about in Cloud City. This new development ties him in more powerfully with the twins and means Leia isn't ignored. It's worth remembering that George Lucas himself probably didn't explicitly set up Luke and Leia as twins when writing ANH, even though it makes a heap of sense by ROTJ that they are. Obi-Wan must honour his debt to Padme by watching out for her two children -- who, of course, are Anakin's kids, too. The SW galaxy is a rough place and it's good to see Obi-Wan stepping into action and seeing Leia beyond being present at her birth. ii) It brings balance to Leia's story and fills in gaps in her characterisation. The prequels treated us to kid Anakin. In the OT, we see Luke before he is anything special. And Rey, if we're including her, is already pretty adept and gets swept up with various iconic legends from practically the first day we see her. Leia, on the other hand, is somewhat thinly sketched by comparison. Lucas essentially built his trilogies around boy wonders. We see their abodes, the people and places they call home, their daily grind for bread, but we never get any of this for Leia. Leia just enters the narrative effectively fully formed. Sure, she has flaws, weaknesses, but she already occupies a high station in life, and any hope of seeing her in a more relaxed or early setting comfortable and familiar to her is erased when the Empire blows up Alderaan. It's nice that this series is finally turning Leia into more of a three-dimensional entity with an early life history. Like Luke, she's a person that matters. By this, one might say the series has adopted the same general mindset as did the Sequel Trilogy in rounding Leia deeper into the macro-storyline as a Child of the Force proportionate to Luke's hero journey. That's right. And since you put it that way, while tangential to your objections and this particular exchange, you just made me think of a crucial meeting reported in "The Art Of Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker" (2020, Phil Szostak, p. 34-35), held on May 21st 2014, with several key Lucasfilm creatives (referred to as the Intellectual Property Development Group), in which Dave Filoni pontificates on the idea that Leia should rightfully be the Obi-Wan of the Sequel Trilogy: That is broadly of a piece with Lucas' own ideas for the sequels (in terms of the basic elevation and centrality of Leia), revealed a little later in "The Star Wars Archives. 1999-2005" (2020, Paul Duncan, p. 585): I think what Lucas handed over to them -- and here, specifically, I am referring to his sequel trilogy outlines -- exerted a strong pressure. It's not that the outlines were followed necessarily, but that they formed the basis of various decisions that have been made since. So, seeing Leia riding high here, so to speak, in the limelight as a child, is a consequence of Lucas' outlines, or even them not following his outlines but then desiring to compensate: to give Leia a more balanced part in the wider meta-text. Now, again, I acknowledge that this is tangential to what you're talking about, or the particular affinities you're adumbrating, but it isn't from nowhere; or even, necessarily, because they're pursuing an agenda or too uncreative to think up alternatives. (I know you haven't said that, per se. Just clarifying here). Well, yeah, I hear what you're saying, but: thinking about form might (in some sense) be your undoing. As you say, perhaps the series is trending away from pop-myth, or that uber-rich, Homeric "Saga" form, and becoming a bit more frivolously episodic and prosaic. But what can we do about it? Lucas himself wanted to get into television: live-action television. But he abandoned things before technology had matured just enough for him to be comfortable to risk (and/or desire) pulling it off. Nothing can quite beat the monolithic power of the cinema screen. Star Wars was born into that medium and found its highest expression there. If it is being dragged away from the stars and into a morass of modern conventions, that's Disney for ya. However, I think it is salvageable, or at least still palatable, still able to offer something, because there remain mythic tropes binding it together. Or in simpler language: the Force. No other franchise can quite offer something on that level. Star Wars is still humming with something, well: uncanny. I think you're here talking about film-form again: pop-majesty. Which is fine. Leia works exceptionally well as you describe her. The OT presents a condensed yet tailored and carefully-contoured documentary-montage view of things. But at some point, Star Wars has to go beyond that. It must break out of that dreamspace a little, because nobody can beat Lucas at his own game, nor should they try. I mean, they should certainly be impressed with his choices and have ambition of their own, of course. But how do you maintain such a careful fabric, and such an enchanting film canvas, if you're no longer even operating in that medium? In the land of television, and in the somewhat duller confines of a "mass-media franchise", I think Star Wars is fated to become a little more "normal": a little less of an inviting infusion; a tad banal. But how much it shrivels away in that direction is up to the people in charge and factors both controllable and less-so. Things do tend to get pounded into the ground in time, so I don't know optimistic I am, but I haven't given up all hope. At least the real titans of the franchise -- George Lucas, John Williams (and we can add people like Ben Burtt and Doug Chiang if you like) -- are still with us. This is the interregnum phase. We should be more concerned about what comes after. Then again: "Always in motion, the future is."
"Don't center on your anxieties, Obi-Wan."Yeah, Star Wars is being transformed into a busy mandala, and those oblique impressions may soon have little space to form or titillate the imagination. But, in fairness to them a little, we're here arguing over 45-year-old lines in the first film (which itself underwent furious rewrites so Lucas could at least put something on-screen that didn't alienate people or blow his limited budget). Lucas himself violated the sealed-up sanctity of many of them. Just take the first line that forms this discussion: "General Kenobi, years ago you served my father in the Clone Wars." Lucas fucked that line over by having Obi-Wan serve the Republic, not so much Bail himself. Bail wasn't giving Obi-Wan instructions, nor did he have the authority to command a troupe of Jedi, in other words. But, of course, if you apply a bit of elliptical thinking, it still works. However, my fundamental point here is: It's George Lucas who violated the line and asked us to rethink things, so we make allowances. Then there's him actually depicting the Clone Wars, rather than leaving it to the imagination. Sure, he tried to make it artisanally abstract: robots vs. clones... clones who come from a strange world, manufactured by "grey" aliens... fighting each other on Mars, inhabited by termite people. Fucking weird. But just depicting this event at all sapped it of some of its ethereal power when the term itself was just originally thrown out and left completely unexplained. Lucas clearly didn't want to be boxed in by his original ur-text. He even quipped to Dave Filoni a few times in the making of TCW: "Continuity is for wimps." We are basically knocking new creatives for -- at root -- doing what The Maker himself already did. Okay, you might say, but Lucas was depicting a rich backstory, while these people are just exploiting little nuggets and cracks. Yeah, I guess. There's a play-it-safe aspect to Disney's handling that is undeniable. I don't think they've snuffed out all the potential of Star Wars, though. And I think some degree of playing-it-safe is understandable. Even George himself went back and polished up the OT movies to try out some new technological toys and make a quick buck. They do it different ways, Lucas and Disney, but they're both sensitive to the bottom line. If Star Wars is getting eroded in that process, okay, shit... it was good while it lasted. I suppose that is my opinion here, yeah. That said, I did say, way back in 2019 on Naboo News, I'd have essentially been alright with a slower-paced, more meditative take on Obi-Wan's lost years in the desert. I'm okay with them changing it, however, to pull in more people. Seeing a half-way competent adventure tale, that is also a character study (and which treats the prequel-era with basic respect), would at least be a sizeable improvement on the Sequel Trilogy. Yeah, look, don't get me wrong there: I was inclined away from shows like "The Mandalorian" and "The Book Of Boba Fett" because of all the desert imagery. I think showing Tatooine is unavoidable with a between-trilogies Obi-Wan, however. Moreover, it simply fits the mystical nature of a Jedi in hiding better. LOL. You put that little film-strip together for little ol' me? "Impressive. Most impressive."Yea-owww-woooie... I suppose that's accurate (in a way). A little unfair, though. It's not like Obi-Wan has spent the whole series in a cave. It's literally just a few scenes in the first episode. There was already no Tatooine in the second episode. I understand it's probably coming back and might take up a big chunk of the series, but Obi-Wan is obviously going back there a changed man. I guess I'll take a pass on The Mattel Years label (funny, though). Leia imperils herself because she's sensitive and hates assholes (or is too stubborn to look people in the eye and make nice with them). It already seems to be more characterisation than the whole Sequel Trilogy. Yep, there I go again, making a negative comparison. I dunno. I guess some of little Leia's traits are what I hoped to see in Rey. Plus, Leia lives on a far nicer planet, and even the horrible one she goes to is far more memorable than virtually anything in the ST. D'oh! There I go again. But Part I was setting everything up. Trudgebowl Kenobi is quite meme-able. There's a chic attitude about his chillax existence there. As Stampid alluded to, it's a bit THX-y. I'm not saying the momentum of the first episode is perfect, but there's at least an interesting counterbalance with Leia's scenes on Alderaan that have a very different feel and move at a lighter, brisker pace. I'd rather just take 'em hot. Although I've started to doubt you can have "hot" without the "mess".
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 9:44:48 GMT
Arch Duke -- I don't wanna leave you out here, so here's my commentary on some of your notes pertaining to the first two episodes: Notes on Episode I the first episode:I guess you all instantly recognised Alderan as I did, eh? An OT planet first fully realised in the PT I never expected us to get this Alderan heavy, or little Leia heavy for the matter. I assumed she'd play a very minor, non-speaking part, as until now Disney Lucasfilm via the sequel trilogy had shown a strong distaste for child acting, something that had been such a prominent part of the PT. I thought she'd be just there in the background as Obi-Wan did a quest. I was nervous they might try to completely ape the distinctiveness of Naboo, but I'm glad they didn't. Alderan will want its own style, it has to stand out in its own way. Very much Switzerland in Space, it seems, so you can definitely see the wealth. Alderaan, my dear fellow! And yes, as I've said in a few replies already, it's a beautifully realised location. Probably the most Narnia-esque planet in Star Wars. Well, now we've seen it in its full glory, at least. Did you get a PT-OT vibe going on in the first episode in the "tussle" between Alderaan and Tatooine? I sure did. The lush romanticism of forests, mountains, and palaces where everyone dresses perfectly and everything sparkles... meets the sparse, arid world that time forgot: a rugged frontier full of lumbering aliens, chugging transports, and gloomy, bearded men. I want to process Tatooine more fully on a second viewing. It came off well, just not especially varied or eye-catching compared to the Saga films. But it was good to see it again after the insipid substitute used in the Sequel Trilogy. You can't beat seeing the homestead again or those twin suns. Alien diversity remains an issue under Disney, but didn't seem especially blighting here. The interplay between Tatooine and the other planets just reminds me how much I love Star Wars. I'm still quite the Trek addict, but other franchises just don't do it for me like Star Wars does. You pretty much summed it up here. The one bit of shakycam that annoyed me was when that Jedi finds Obi-Wan on Tatooine and Obi-Wan tells him to go and lead a normal life. The cameraman seemed to be having an epileptic seizure in that scene. Otherwise, I didn't notice it too much. I just accept that this is the "style" now. I think I'm going to agree with you. Look at us lot. We're not up in arms about it. We're not saying the series is terrible and beyond all hope. We're not complaining about retcons, Mary Sues, token gestures, broken promises, and empty plot gestures that go nowhere. It feels like something has changed here. The prequels are suddenly respected and there's at least the semblance of a story being told that honours them. Y'know: Something moderately Star Warsian and engaging. Quite amazing, really. Notes on Episode II the second episodeIt wasn't bad either. The Leia actress has a little bit of Anakin in her, doesn't she? Very good casting like Jake Llyod, I must say. As I said on my comments on the first episode, it's good to see child actors returning to Star Wars, it makes thing feel that much more Phantom Menacey. A youthful vibrancy is with us once more. You make an excellent point here. I knew there was something that I liked about this that I couldn't put into words. You just did. Kids don't appear in the OT and only fleetingly in the ST. Just something else that sets the prequels apart and now "Obi-Wan Kenobi". Interesting. What's funny is: Ewan McGregor is 51 years old. Jimmy Smits is 66. Execute Order Jimmy Smits. Anyway, that's a fifteen-year age gap! I guess Ewan was okay with that scene. Maybe it was explained to him along the lines you just suggested and they're poking some fun or setting something up. And Obi-Wan keeps shouting "Leia!" in that part. Reminds me of Luke shouting after his sister when she quickly decides to jump on that speeder bike on Endor, almost bolting through the forest without him.
The dynamic is surprising, but very welcome. I hope it isn't now over, but it could be. At some point, the story will presumably transition to featuring a bit more of Luke. Or who knows? It's kinda fun being in the dark here and just embracing what comes up.
Not sure how they're going to tackle this. Maybe that's all we're getting. Mind you, that horrible cousin tells Leia she isn't a "real Organa", which obviously shakes her up. Perhaps there will be some follow-up. A few things: i) I think that scene is a little busy, but it gives Reva some believable character: an edge. That is, she kills her boss and then immediately tells Obi-Wan about Anakin/Vader, like she is letting out some of her rage and adrenaline over the murder she just committed. This has all been a bold gambit on her part. Even if she fails to capture Obi-Wan, she knows for sure now he also lives and she wants to leave him changed by their encounter. ii) Reva just seems to have done her homework on Obi-Wan and his past. Maybe not many people are privy to the knowledge that Anakin Skywalker became Darth Vader, but I think there can be exceptions. Dare I bring up the sequels? How did Rey know? Yeah, I know: Mary Sue information kiosk. How hidden that knowledge is within the galaxy hasn't been well-established thus far. iii) You might argue that Obi-Wan has sensed it in the Force and that's what the nightmare scene is about. He's just been suppressing it. Like Padme, he will take flight somewhere and try and confirm it. It might be that then he truly senses it in the Force -- maybe when Vader is near. Vader could even sneak up beside him. I think Ewan has already hinted at something like that in some interviews. The makeup here was pretty impressive, but it's a bit of an exaggeration: a real horror-movie vibe. Even when Vader was being assembled at the end of ROTS, Anakin's face looked... normal. All scarred and burned, of course, but you could tell it was Hayden. This image of Vader was more brutal-looking. I guess there is no one exact "look" he should have and different directors will do it different ways. LOL. Sorry to disappoint you, but I believe that cousin was just visiting. That was why Leia tricked her mother and ran away. Her distant family was flying in and she really didn't want to see them. Wasn't there a ship scene later on where the extended family is waved goodbye? I mean, yeah, ships can ferry people to different parts of the same planet. I can't remember, now, actually. Need to watch again.
|
|
|
Post by Seeker of the Whills on May 30, 2022 10:00:28 GMT
Cryogenic Yeah, the man leading the child to safety is an old trope, but there was a pretty recent movie I had in mind, and now on my third watch of the series I figured it out: Logan, one of the two movies cited as an influence by the director. It was on the tip of my tongue this whole time, but now it really clicked for me what kind of tone they are going for. More so than Joker, I think this series owes a lot to Logan. You have the punished hero, the gifted little girl, mercenaries hunting them, the desert, Logan had Professor X while Obi-Wan communes with Qui-Gon or at least tries to, etc. I think the series holds up well on rewatches. I'm getting more and more from it each time I watch it. It's more rewatchable for me than Book of Boba Fett or even The Mandalorian. Those feel a little more "disposable" in comparison, save for a few scenes or episodes. Obi-Wan on the other hand has tapped right into the core of the Star Wars saga, as it literally takes place between the two trilogies. It's up there with Rogue One as a valuable Lucas-adjacent piece of Star Wars. So Filoni and Favreau did have a hand in this. That's pretty cool. While Chow definitely proved herself with the episodes of The Mandalorian she directed, I wonder why they decided to go with her and new writers instead of relying more on Favreau and especially Filoni, who already touched on the Obi-Wan/Vader story in Rebels. And I thought it was good that The Mandalorian had many directors, while this series only has one director. It's a gamble, especially with this series being a much bigger thing than the previous two, but we'll se if it paid off when all the episodes are released. Obi-Wan revealing the saber. That I find interesting. And it got me to think about Qui-Gon seemingly accidentally revealing the saber to Anakin. Or did he want Anakin to know he was a Jedi? To test him? Perhaps Obi-Wan assumes that everybody thinks the Jedi are dead, so they would either think that he killed a Jedi and took their saber or scavenged a Jedi ship like Teeka. I kind of find it cool too that he seemingly dons what appear close to Jedi robes again at the end of episode one, when he's ready to go to work again. Of course in ANH he wears Jedi robes and uses his lightsaber in the cantina, and no one seems too bothered. Maybe no one believes any real Jedi exist anymore. He can hide in plain sight. There is an intimacy to this series more so than the other ones. There are a lot of shots of Obi-Wan's face, particularly from a lower angle. That is probably the influence of Joker. Maybe they consciously took some of the attention off the spectacular vistas to focus more on what the character is feeling. The first episode certainly feels like that. The second episode put some more focus into the Blade Runner-esque world around him. There is a lot to chew on with this series, but here's some things I noticed with repeat viewings: The main theme is really growing on me. First I thought it was a bit generic and too understated, but now I think it perfectly fits the more somber tone of the series. It is a bit similar to Rey's theme, but both are up there with classic John Williams. The general feel of the show is pretty close to the prequels. It's not as "prestige" as I imagined from the trailers. Joker and Logan are clear influences, but I think the prequel influence is stronger. There is a certain B-quality, and charm that comes with it. I noticed that space travel is not as important to this series as the previous two, just like it isn't in the prequels. Characters travel from planet to planet, with nothing more than the beginning and end of the trip shown at most. No lenghty scenes inside ships while travelling through hyperspace. It's borderline experimental how the series starts with the prequel recap that rocks your world with the emotional high point of the entire saga, the end of RotS, and then drops you into a very quiet Tatooine setting. Well, there is the Order 66 scene which is kind of a bridge, but still. If you thought that going from the explosive end of RotS to the by today's standards slow and quiet beginning of ANH was a jerky shift, this series amps up that tonal shift even more. This series also got me to reflect on the Lucas films from new angles. Seeing glimpses of Luke and Leia's fairly normal childhoods reinforces what a special child Anakin was. Both Luke and Leia have an adoptive father and mother, while Ankin only had a mother, and a series of temporary father figures. Watto, Qui-Gon, Obi-Wan and Palpatine. All tragic relationships in one form or another. Also, just watching the very beginning of TPM after Obi-Wan, I now noticed a feature that makes the Lucas films unique: You're thrust into a very formal world where there are a lot of different titles and classes, and few ordinary people. Chancellor, Jedi, ambassadors, master, viceroy, droids. Solo parodied this aspect of Lucas' Star Wars with Qi'ra introducing herself as some representative on Kessel. Which actually is similar to the fake Jedi Haja. Disney Star Wars is a bit meta like that sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 11:33:49 GMT
Cryogenic Yeah, the man leading the child to safety is an old trope, but there was a pretty recent movie I had in mind, and now on my third watch of the series I figured it out: Logan, one of the two movies cited as an influence by the director. It was on the tip of my tongue this whole time, but now it really clicked for me what kind of tone they are going for. More so than Joker, I think this series owes a lot to Logan. You have the punished hero, the gifted little girl, mercenaries hunting them, the desert, Logan had Professor X while Obi-Wan communes with Qui-Gon or at least tries to, etc. Nice. Star Wars seems so flexible in what it is able to draw upon for inspiration. It's good that it is able to borrow from present-day big boys while retaining its own look and feel. You never know what could influence it next. I'm encouraged you're finding it more rewatchable. They only had six episodes to play with, so I guess they've given this series their all. I think it's a stroke of genius to set it right in the middle of two giants (the PT and the OT). That genius has now revealed itself in the subplot -- main plot device? -- involving Obi-Wan and Leia. Any earlier and Leia is too close to the baby or toddler phase. Any later and she would be in her teens. This exact time setting enables her to echo Anakin in Episode I (ditto Luke). It even leaves some mystery surrounding what happens before this little period and after. Just feels like the perfect choice. I love how they've given the whole series (it is, of course, a "mini") to one director. Perhaps in picking Chow, they are fulfilling a diversity quota. I mean, for God's sake, that can't be the only reason, of course! But since she is female and Asian-American, and clearly very competent and passionate for the material, she just became exactly the right choice. Bravo. This is what should have happened on the Sequel Trilogy. The white men fucked it up. We need more ethnically-diverse women helming Star Wars, clearly, if this series is anything to go by. I'd like to know what Chow's personal angle is. What drew her to the project? She deserves credit for being the first person at Disney/LFL to helm a pro-prequel live-action project. It's a pretty big job (or a gamble as you said) to be steering something of this magnitude. Disney need to win fans back round to the idea that they can handle Star Wars and bring compelling stories to the screen. Messing up Kenobi, one of the most beloved and rock-steady characters in the whole franchise, will come with a price. Wow! Solid reasoning. I'm kind of embarrassed I didn't think of that. You're right: People don't care, or they assume he's dangerous and might have killed a Jedi and wears the saber as a trophy, or he got it via scavenging (or from a scavenger like Teeka), or that it's some imitation-thing, or just a fancy flashlight. I suppose being a Jedi, or implying you are one, is all about the theatricality. The meta moments with Haja perhaps highlight this later on. Hiding in plain sight seems to be something characters do in Star Wars a lot. I'm liking it here. It works for television. It's hard to fault the visual style, other than noting it isn't all that Lucasian. It might not be super-exciting, but it works. In fact, a bit less flash and sizzle, with more emphasis on character emotion and storytelling, is welcome after a somewhat desperate bells-and-whistles approach in the ST. It's early days, but perhaps the liveliness of this thread is already bearing that statement out? I love the YouTube upload. Always a delight to read the positive comments. And they've actually gone with an artistic animation for the video graphic, should you desire to gaze at it while listening (a bit surplus-to-requirements when it's John Williams, mind you), which I like (I actually find it quite hypnotic): They're just hunkering down with the storytelling, I would guess. There isn't time to waste with only six episodes and that's your lot. It is hard for me to comment on the tone of this show compared to the others. I imagine it's kind of "the same, but different". But, even with all my present ignorance about the other shows, I get the impression this one is more focused. I think that maybe they were trying to flesh out thin concepts and create meme-moments in the other shows to fill up all the blank spaces, while the Kenobi series is demonstrating more discipline. It also has a lot more weighty material to work with, since it is splitting the difference between the PT and the OT and constantly busy at creating connections. I have the sense that this show is "happy" in its work. Like Jar Jar, it is honoured to accept dissa heavy burden. I had a strange thought that Vader is putting these images in Obi-Wan's head. I mean, Palpatine might have done it to him, and Anakin spends a lot of time in his healing chamber -- i.e., plenty of time to meditate and "focus" his Force powers in a psychic/telekinetic sense? Obi-Wan just doesn't know it yet. Besides the stylistic effect, it's really interesting to think about where these images/montages may be coming from. Probably nowhere, maybe somewhere. Yeah, I think that's kind of the "method" behind this setting and these storytelling choices. They want to really emphasise how the twins had a very different upbringing, and a better shot of coming out better-adjusted, than their father. That after the Titanic-like tragedy of ROTS, there was still hope to be found in giving Luke and Leia loving families. I like how strongly attached their adoptive parents are. Bad outcomes befell Anakin and Padme, but their kids are (relatively) safe and cared for. And destined for great things, no less. It's an incredibly poignant connection between the trilogies. Sadly, I'm not sure Disney found anything like that to connect the ST with the OT (they probably did a better job connecting it with the PT when they brought back Palpatine and gave him all those prequel lines and gestures). But this: this is really stirring and epic. This Vanity Fair article probably describes, in a handful of words, the "high society" aspect of the PT best: www.vanityfair.com/news/2005/02/star-wars-george-lucas-storyLucas replaced some of the heroic hijinks and rag-tag goofiness of the OT with a much more opulent and lavish allegory about a good person going bad and a democracy falling into ruin. I think the ambition of the PT confounds people to this very day. A series focusing mainly on Obi-Wan might be more manageable for many people. It appeals to staunch prequel fans like us and hopefully is watchable and liked by more casual or closet prequel fans, too. I hope Disney/LFL realise what a popular character Obi-Wan is and how favourably fans have always treated Ewan in the role.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on May 30, 2022 12:14:34 GMT
By this, one might say the series has adopted the same general mindset as did the Sequel Trilogy in rounding Leia deeper into the macro-storyline as a Child of the Force proportionate to Luke's hero journey. That's right. And since you put it that way, while tangential to your objections and this particular exchange, you just made me think of a crucial meeting reported in "The Art Of Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker" (2020, Phil Szostak, p. 34-35), held on May 21st 2014, with several key Lucasfilm creatives (referred to as the Intellectual Property Development Group), in which Dave Filoni pontificates on the idea that Leia should rightfully be the Obi-Wan of the Sequel Trilogy: That is broadly of a piece with Lucas' own ideas for the sequels (in terms of the basic elevation and centrality of Leia), revealed a little later in "The Star Wars Archives. 1999-2005" (2020, Paul Duncan, p. 585): I think what Lucas handed over to them -- and here, specifically, I am referring to his sequel trilogy outlines -- exerted a strong pressure. It's not that the outlines were followed necessarily, but that they formed the basis of various decisions that have been made since. So, seeing Leia riding high here, so to speak, in the limelight as a child, is a consequence of Lucas' outlines, or even them not following his outlines but then desiring to compensate: to give Leia a more balanced part in the wider meta-text. Now, again, I acknowledge that this is tangential to what you're talking about, or the particular affinities you're adumbrating, but it isn't from nowhere; or even, necessarily, because they're pursuing an agenda or too uncreative to think up alternatives. (I know you haven't said that, per se. Just clarifying here). I'm just gonna come right out and say it: I was never all that keen on OT heroes returning for a sequel chapter even where such was included in Lucas' own outlines. What we eventually got has only solidified my stance. I'm also skeptical of just how sincere Lucas was with those ideas as something he would have pursued himself had he chose to stick it out for yet a third trilogy versus in some way an artistic compromise he thought might've worked best, safest, commercially speaking in the hands of others. Just my gut instinct speaking, but, I feel like his once proposed microscopic adventures of the Whills rang more batshit true to his intentions with pushing the very idea of Star Wars in a different direction. And, yes, I would have been all for that over bringing back older Luke, Han, Leia etc. even were Lucas the helming the latter. Well, yeah, I hear what you're saying, but: thinking about form might (in some sense) be your undoing. As you say, perhaps the series is trending away from pop-myth, or that uber-rich, Homeric "Saga" form, and becoming a bit more frivolously episodic and prosaic. But what can we do about it? Express opposing perspectives and insight.
You're right of course: the machine now is, and there's no point griping over that very fact. But for my part I'm always attempting to understand that machine -- even appreciate it when 'n' where I can -- and argue its distinction adverse to what Lucas did; to highlight differences in standards and sophistications while Star Wars continues to no longer be an island onto itself but increasingly homogeneous with everything else... and also to opine what Star Wars still possibly can be past everything we've gotten thus far post-Lucas.
I worded that so weirdly, I even confused myself.
Lucas himself wanted to get into television: live-action television. But he abandoned things before technology had matured just enough for him to be comfortable to risk (and/or desire) pulling it off. Nothing can quite beat the monolithic power of the cinema screen. Star Wars was born into that medium and found its highest expression there. If it is being dragged away from the stars and into a morass of modern conventions, that's Disney for ya. However, I think it is salvageable, or at least still palatable, still able to offer something, because there remain mythic tropes binding it together. Or in simpler language: the Force. No other franchise can quite offer something on that level. Star Wars is still humming with something, well: uncanny. I should perhaps set straight that I'm not contra to television on principle. I do think the modern era of television/streaming content is extremely overrated and I miss the days of short-form narrative. I remain forever bummed that Lucas' small-screen ambition fell short precisely because I sensed from it a potential for, how to put this, comparably ingenuous fast-and-loose narratives amidst a seedy Star Wars underworld as produced by a studio when it was still independent; episodes written/directed in less modish and more punk-cornball style, and with a touch of that anti-filmic, live-broadcast videographic effect somewhat akin to the nascent digital of Attack of the Clones. Star Wars TV that is...dumber..? Honestly, the trailer for Disney's upcoming Willow series is the closest analogy to something that exists. Clumsy like that but even less corporate in its production value; there was something about the crudeness of those test footage clips that I found charming. I think you're here talking about film-form again: pop-majesty. Which is fine. Leia works exceptionally well as you describe her. The OT presents a condensed yet tailored and carefully-contoured documentary-montage view of things. But at some point, Star Wars has to go beyond that. If only...
Hell, that's what I want. But so far they're mostly just going beneath, and in circles with the story content.
It must break out of that dreamspace a little, because nobody can beat Lucas at his own game, nor should they try. I mean, they should certainly be impressed with his choices and have ambition of their own, of course. But how do you maintain such a careful fabric, and such an enchanting film canvas, if you're no longer even operating in that medium? In the land of television, and in the somewhat duller confines of a "mass-media franchise", I think Star Wars is fated to become a little more "normal": a little less of an inviting infusion; a tad banal. But how much it shrivels away in that direction is up to the people in charge and factors both controllable and less-so. Things do tend to get pounded into the ground in time, so I don't know optimistic I am, but I haven't given up all hope. At least the real titans of the franchise -- George Lucas, John Williams (and we can add people like Ben Burtt and Doug Chiang if you like) -- are still with us. This is the interregnum phase. We should be more concerned about what comes after. Andor being a separate topic, I will not indulge here as I might elsewhere in an upcoming thread I'm working on; suffice to say, I'm feeling some cognitive dissonance with its trailer that, believe it or not, has my interest sparked.
Yeah, Star Wars is being transformed into a busy mandala, and those oblique impressions may soon have little space to form or titillate the imagination. But, in fairness to them a little, we're here arguing over 45-year-old lines in the first film (which itself underwent furious rewrites so Lucas could at least put something on-screen that didn't alienate people or blow his limited budget). Lucas himself violated the sealed-up sanctity of many of them. Just take the first line that forms this discussion: "General Kenobi, years ago you served my father in the Clone Wars." Lucas fucked that line over by having Obi-Wan serve the Republic, not so much Bail himself. Bail wasn't giving Obi-Wan instructions, nor did he have the authority to command a troupe of Jedi, in other words. But, of course, if you apply a bit of elliptical thinking, it still works. However, my fundamental point here is: It's George Lucas who violated the line and asked us to rethink things, so we make allowances. Then there's him actually depicting the Clone Wars, rather than leaving it to the imagination. Sure, he tried to make it artisanally abstract: robots vs. clones... clones who come from a strange world, manufactured by "grey" aliens... fighting each other on Mars, inhabited by termite people. Fucking weird. But just depicting this event at all sapped it of some of its ethereal power when the term itself was just originally thrown out and left completely unexplained. Lucas clearly didn't want to be boxed in by his original ur-text. He even quipped to Dave Filoni a few times in the making of TCW: "Continuity is for wimps." We are basically knocking new creatives for -- at root -- doing what The Maker himself already did. Okay, you might say, but Lucas was depicting a rich backstory, while these people are just exploiting little nuggets and cracks. Yeah, I guess. There's a play-it-safe aspect to Disney's handling that is undeniable. I don't think they've snuffed out all the potential of Star Wars, though. And I think some degree of playing-it-safe is understandable. Even George himself went back and polished up the OT movies to try out some new technological toys and make a quick buck. They do it different ways, Lucas and Disney, but they're both sensitive to the bottom line. If Star Wars is getting eroded in that process, okay, shit... it was good while it lasted. I think of it this way... Lucas struck his own claim. He mined it, then mined it further but with the intent to complete a thing, those resources then having served their purpose. Disney and their creative workforce? They haven't any claim of their own. If Star Wars is the greater land, they're just showing up to the same creeks and mine shafts. Someone give them a map and some metal detectors or something. I suppose that is my opinion here, yeah. That said, I did say, way back in 2019 on Naboo News, I'd have essentially been alright with a slower-paced, more meditative take on Obi-Wan's lost years in the desert. I'm okay with them changing it, however, to pull in more people. Seeing a half-way competent adventure tale, that is also a character study (and which treats the prequel-era with basic respect), would at least be a sizeable improvement on the Sequel Trilogy. Look, I ALREADY prefer Obi-Wan Kenobi over the Sequel Trilogy. That's a goddamn given. A-motherfuckin-priori.
LOL. You put that little film-strip together for little ol' me? No, I found it on the internet. Everyone knows about you, Cryo. And we're all worried.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 12:40:37 GMT
Well, yeah, I hear what you're saying, but: thinking about form might (in some sense) be your undoing. As you say, perhaps the series is trending away from pop-myth, or that uber-rich, Homeric "Saga" form, and becoming a bit more frivolously episodic and prosaic. But what can we do about it? Express opposing perspectives and insight.
You're right of course: the machine now is, and there's no point griping over that very fact. But for my part I'm always attempting to understand that machine -- even appreciate it when 'n' where I can -- and argue its distinction adverse to what Lucas did; to highlight differences in standards and sophistications while Star Wars continues to no longer be an island onto itself but increasingly homogeneous with everything else... and also to opine what Star Wars still possibly can be past everything we've gotten thus far post-Lucas.
I worded that so weirdly, I even confused myself.
No, you didn't. I mean, no more weirdly than you word anything else.
You got a smart mouth, Cryo.Seriously, you actually put that in a mushy but sincere way. There is something powerful glinting in that response: a hope for something better that won't die. Anyway, I'm quite tired now and must rest a while (odd work shifts, along with my excitement for this series, have screwed up my waking-sleeping pattern). I'll try not to disappear into the Force like Yoda. If I do, I hope there are some tank-topped babes in the afterlife. Other than that, I'll be back to address a few points later.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 13:58:00 GMT
Can I just take the opportunity to thank Entertainment Weekly for this splendid headline: Now there's a writer who can connect the OT with the PT Contrast Devan to the clown from Time magazine (see page 20) who had the nerve to write a "Time to forgive Hayden Christensen" article at the onset of the new series, which we then firmly debunked, and Twitter tore her to shreds. The EW piece is worth reading:
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 14:32:21 GMT
We have another thread dedicated to Disney's overall handling of Star Wars. Whilst comparisons to other films are inevitable, it's certainly out of place to be discussing the minute development process of the sequels, and the supposed idea that Disney carried out Lucas vision for it.
|
|
|
Post by Ingram on May 30, 2022 19:23:50 GMT
We have another thread dedicated to Disney's overall handling of Star Wars. Whilst comparisons to other films are inevitable, it's certainly out of place to be discussing the minute development process of the sequels, and the supposed idea that Disney carried out Lucas vision for it. He started it, it's not my fault, gosh!
*folds arms, stares out backseat window*
|
|
|
Post by Seeker of the Whills on May 30, 2022 19:30:58 GMT
Cryogenic Yeah, the man leading the child to safety is an old trope, but there was a pretty recent movie I had in mind, and now on my third watch of the series I figured it out: Logan, one of the two movies cited as an influence by the director. It was on the tip of my tongue this whole time, but now it really clicked for me what kind of tone they are going for. More so than Joker, I think this series owes a lot to Logan. You have the punished hero, the gifted little girl, mercenaries hunting them, the desert, Logan had Professor X while Obi-Wan communes with Qui-Gon or at least tries to, etc. Nice. Star Wars seems so flexible in what it is able to draw upon for inspiration. It's good that it is able to borrow from present-day big boys while retaining its own look and feel. You never know what could influence it next. I'm encouraged you're finding it more rewatchable. They only had six episodes to play with, so I guess they've given this series their all. I think it's a stroke of genius to set it right in the middle of two giants (the PT and the OT). That genius has now revealed itself in the subplot -- main plot device? -- involving Obi-Wan and Leia. Any earlier and Leia is too close to the baby or toddler phase. Any later and she would be in her teens. This exact time setting enables her to echo Anakin in Episode I (ditto Luke). It even leaves some mystery surrounding what happens before this little period and after. Just feels like the perfect choice. I love how they've given the whole series (it is, of course, a "mini") to one director. Perhaps in picking Chow, they are fulfilling a diversity quota. I mean, for God's sake, that can't be the only reason, of course! But since she is female and Asian-American, and clearly very competent and passionate for the material, she just became exactly the right choice. Bravo. This is what should have happened on the Sequel Trilogy. The white men fucked it up. We need more ethnically-diverse women helming Star Wars, clearly, if this series is anything to go by. I'd like to know what Chow's personal angle is. What drew her to the project? She deserves credit for being the first person at Disney/LFL to helm a pro-prequel live-action project. It's a pretty big job (or a gamble as you said) to be steering something of this magnitude. Disney need to win fans back round to the idea that they can handle Star Wars and bring compelling stories to the screen. Messing up Kenobi, one of the most beloved and rock-steady characters in the whole franchise, will come with a price. Wow! Solid reasoning. I'm kind of embarrassed I didn't think of that. You're right: People don't care, or they assume he's dangerous and might have killed a Jedi and wears the saber as a trophy, or he got it via scavenging (or from a scavenger like Teeka), or that it's some imitation-thing, or just a fancy flashlight. I suppose being a Jedi, or implying you are one, is all about the theatricality. The meta moments with Haja perhaps highlight this later on. Hiding in plain sight seems to be something characters do in Star Wars a lot. I'm liking it here. It works for television. It's hard to fault the visual style, other than noting it isn't all that Lucasian. It might not be super-exciting, but it works. In fact, a bit less flash and sizzle, with more emphasis on character emotion and storytelling, is welcome after a somewhat desperate bells-and-whistles approach in the ST. It's early days, but perhaps the liveliness of this thread is already bearing that statement out? I love the YouTube upload. Always a delight to read the positive comments. And they've actually gone with an artistic animation for the video graphic, should you desire to gaze at it while listening (a bit surplus-to-requirements when it's John Williams, mind you), which I like (I actually find it quite hypnotic): They're just hunkering down with the storytelling, I would guess. There isn't time to waste with only six episodes and that's your lot. It is hard for me to comment on the tone of this show compared to the others. I imagine it's kind of "the same, but different". But, even with all my present ignorance about the other shows, I get the impression this one is more focused. I think that maybe they were trying to flesh out thin concepts and create meme-moments in the other shows to fill up all the blank spaces, while the Kenobi series is demonstrating more discipline. It also has a lot more weighty material to work with, since it is splitting the difference between the PT and the OT and constantly busy at creating connections. I have the sense that this show is "happy" in its work. Like Jar Jar, it is honoured to accept dissa heavy burden. I had a strange thought that Vader is putting these images in Obi-Wan's head. I mean, Palpatine might have done it to him, and Anakin spends a lot of time in his healing chamber -- i.e., plenty of time to meditate and "focus" his Force powers in a psychic/telekinetic sense? Obi-Wan just doesn't know it yet. Besides the stylistic effect, it's really interesting to think about where these images/montages may be coming from. Probably nowhere, maybe somewhere. Yeah, I think that's kind of the "method" behind this setting and these storytelling choices. They want to really emphasise how the twins had a very different upbringing, and a better shot of coming out better-adjusted, than their father. That after the Titanic-like tragedy of ROTS, there was still hope to be found in giving Luke and Leia loving families. I like how strongly attached their adoptive parents are. Bad outcomes befell Anakin and Padme, but their kids are (relatively) safe and cared for. And destined for great things, no less. It's an incredibly poignant connection between the trilogies. Sadly, I'm not sure Disney found anything like that to connect the ST with the OT (they probably did a better job connecting it with the PT when they brought back Palpatine and gave him all those prequel lines and gestures). But this: this is really stirring and epic. This Vanity Fair article probably describes, in a handful of words, the "high society" aspect of the PT best: www.vanityfair.com/news/2005/02/star-wars-george-lucas-storyLucas replaced some of the heroic hijinks and rag-tag goofiness of the OT with a much more opulent and lavish allegory about a good person going bad and a democracy falling into ruin. I think the ambition of the PT confounds people to this very day. A series focusing mainly on Obi-Wan might be more manageable for many people. It appeals to staunch prequel fans like us and hopefully is watchable and liked by more casual or closet prequel fans, too. I hope Disney/LFL realise what a popular character Obi-Wan is and how favourably fans have always treated Ewan in the role. Yeah, kid Leia grew on me fast. First I thought "No, they wouldn't do that", but now I see it as a nice echo of kid Anakin, like you say. It's kind of interesting that we all probably expected Obi-Wan to take young Luke under his wing like Qui-Gon did with Anakin, but they switched it with Leia and really pulled the rug from under us. I thought Bail's "She's as important as he is" was a little on the nose and didn't really need to be said, since everyone knows Leia is the other hope, but I dig the direction they've gone. Chow certainly seems to get Star Wars. I especially appreciate that she championed the inclusion of Vader into the show when Lucasfilm wasn't sure. And she understands that Anakin is a part of Vader. Also from Wikipedia: All sounds very promising. She clearly has a vision for the series. I love that YouTube upload also, with the light shining on the logo. It's like "This is it, what we've all been waiting for." Also brings to mind the theme of a glimmer of hope. And I really like the whole brown/sand thing they're going for with the opening title. You're right that the lack of space travel scenes probably is due to time reasons, but that speaks to a propulsion and immediacy in the story being told. Not ragging on the OT or anything, but some of the longer sections in the Millennium Falcon in TESB feel a bit extraneous in comparison to Luke's side of the story. Only TPM, which might be the most OT-like in some ways of the prequels, has a few longer scenes inside a ship like Padmé comforting Anakin. AotC and RotS have a lot of planet-hopping, where there's important action in different locales, which doesn't leave time for scenes of space travel. I think that is a good sign. You're also right that The Mandalorian doesn't have such a clearly focused story to tell, so there might have been some filler needed. I had an idea or a wish that the series would include some sort of "meditation battle" between Obi-Wan and Vader, instead of a physical confrontation, just to preserve the continuity of Lucas' films. It looks like they are actually going to meet, but I would still like to see them use their Force powers over great distances to try and influence each other. Your idea that it's Vader sending Obi-Wan these visions is spot on. Something like that does have precedent in Star Wars. That's a very good quote on the prequels, especially "ambitious characters jostling for space". That's what I tried to say about there being no time for space travel. The characters and their stories take all the space. Especially AotC comes to mind with Obi-Wan going from Coruscant to Kamino to Geonosis, and Anakin/Padmé going from Coruscant to Naboo to Tatooine to Geonosis. I feel there is some of that same urgency in the Obi-Wan show, that maybe the previous shows lacked. This is just something I noticed now on YouTube, and I don't think it has been posted here yet: The title of the video is maybe a bit sensationalistic, since the actors don't really say that, but Ewan does go there again about the difficulties of bluescreen and whatnot. He did previously say that the Obi-Wan series will feel more "real" than the prequels. But I have to say that I'm not really seeing that. The effects are good, especially for TV, but the whole thing does feel more constrained than the prequels. Of course the prequels are films with a bigger budget, so a comparison may not be fair, but Ewan made the claim himself. I think he personally had a more "realistic" Star Wars experience on set with the "Volume" technology, but the finished product doesn't quite bear it out.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 19:39:37 GMT
I think we're only getting warmed up in this series. The real meat and potatoes is yet to come, it's going to go up several more gears.
I'd agree with your hunch, Cryro, that Leia will go head back to Alderaan now, and take a seat for the remainder of the series. It would be logical that they bring Luke into the following two episodes. If its anything like the Saga's Episodic III and IV, then we're in for quite a ride.
Still, if they continue with Leia, and put the fanboy confusion over the Padmé reference to bed, I can't say I'll be unhappy. We've never had the mother-daughter dynamic in the Saga before, there is an opportunity to do something fresh here. I feel like they haven't gone far enough yet. Leia obviously knows that she was adopted, and one wonders how curious she is about her real parents. I think we deserve to see some of that most human of curiosities depicted on screen, as we got it with Luke in the OT. I'm guessing Bail told Leia a very sad story at some point, much as Obi-Wan told Luke in its more poetic form in IV - it would be cool to see a new scene mirroring the original.
I've zero interest in seeing Leia do Jedi business, or more chases. I want to see something much more human, and that is the subject of adoption and how it affects those people. It would be cool to see an interviewer mention Padmé in an interview with the director, it's never been raised. She must surely have a lot of thoughts. I trust her to honour her. I notice a few people on Twitter complaining that making Anakin-Leia comparisons dishonours Bail and Breia, the parents who really did raise her. I think this is utter nonsense, it doesn't have to be one set of parents or the other. The reason we do so, the reason it has meaning to us, is the simple fact that Padmé and Anakin were tragically deprived of the ability to become mother and father - we have no indication that they would have turned out awful patents. There was a disaster at the end of ROTS, killing one parent and metaphorically killing the other, so Leia became an orphan and had to be adopted. Besides, I'm sure Bail would be very open for telling the truth, he was essentially a godfather, being a friend of Padmé, he's not going to take any offence. Also, be mindful my fellow prequelists, "this whole [gifted young child] operation was [George Lucas'] idea":
I thought Bail's "She's as important as he is" was a little on the nose and didn't really need to be said, since everyone knows Leia is the other hope, but I dig the direction they've gone. I doubt Bail is championing grand notions of gender equality here. I don't see this line as trying to make Leia into Luke, as TROS awkwardly attempted. I think this is simply the case of a father standing up for his daughter (as he should), one of the orphaned Skywalker twins whose very adoption plan he decided with this man back in Episode III. I think we're viewing the story too retrospectively, with too much 20-20 vision, knowing how all turns out in Episode IV with Luke showing a giftedness with the Force, and him saving his father in Episode VI. If you block that out of your mind for a few moments, pretend that you're in Bail or Obi-Wan shoes, and you are someone who has no certainty that the Empire will ever de taken down or democratised again. You have hope for Luke, that the Force could be usually strong in him, but neither can you see the future, you know that even Master Yoda failed to defeat Sidious. There's a chance that Leia could emulate her mother as a key figure in a rebellion, but you don't know if that will be her true calling in life, maybe she'll get sick of politics as a teenager, maybe the task will be too overwhelming. I love the idea Bail and Obi-Wan are minding the twins as a commitment to their late friends. Even if the children aren't strong enough to lead and fight the Empire, they can rest easy in the knowledge that by offering them some form of a comforting childhood, they've at least honoured Padmé and Anakin.
Our friends over on Tumblr are poetic.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on May 30, 2022 21:42:34 GMT
Yes, like Hitler in The Sound of Music, or God in Jesus Christ Superstar.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 23:15:23 GMT
We have another thread dedicated to Disney's overall handling of Star Wars. Whilst comparisons to other films are inevitable, it's certainly out of place to be discussing the minute development process of the sequels, and the supposed idea that Disney carried out Lucas vision for it. He started it, it's not my fault, gosh!
*folds arms, stares out backseat window* LOL! We've been told! Arch Duke is right, though. It's a digression and quite the gnarly topic to be getting into in this 'ere Obi-Wan thread. But I will just push back on one thing: and the supposed idea that Disney carried out Lucas vision for it. That wasn't quite what I was saying. I was merely contending that the enlargement of Leia in the sequels, or her undeniably bigger and unexpected presence in this series (so far), partly stems from what Lucas said -- per the "Star Wars Archives" book (for the prequels) -- were his own plans for the sequels (i.e., the Leia-centric story he intended). It was something of a seed he planted. If anything, I was using that notion to defend the Obi-Wan series against the complaint that the whole Leia/Alderaan thing feels superfluous. Which, of course, doesn't necessarily constitute a robust, Fort Knox defence of that aspect, but I was at least trying to situate it in Lucas' own choices. Now, let's return to the subject matter at hand.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 23:24:49 GMT
A lot of people are theorising that Reva is in the Order 66 scene.
Let's do some basic math: Youngling age = 10 years at the very most Time between Episode III and Obi-Wan series = 10 years 10 + 10 = 20 years old Reva does not look 20 years on Tatoinne. More like 30 years. Even if we try to be very generous at 25, that means she would be 15 as a youngling. Teenage youngling anyone?! Conclusion: Reva cannot be in the Order 66 scene at the beginning of Part I. She's much closer to the age of Anakin/Vader, who would be around 33 by this series.
If I were to bet, she's some 15-20 year old padowan in the Jedi Temple, who may well have been present during its storming. She's certainly someone with a lot of insider information anyway, which raises quite a lot of questions.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 23:51:56 GMT
A lot of people are theorising that Reva is in the Order 66 scene.
Let's do some basic math: Youngling age = 10 years at the very most Time between Episode III and Obi-Wan series = 10 years 10 + 10 = 20 years old Reva does not look 20 years on Tatoinne (sic). More like 30 years. Even if we try to be very generous at 25, that means she would be 15 as a youngling. Teenage youngling anyone?! Conclusion: Reva cannot be in the Order 66 scene at the beginning of Part I. She's much closer to the age of Anakin/Vader, who would be around 33 by this series. If I were to bet, she's some 15-20 year old padowan in the Jedi Temple, who may well have been present during its storming. She's certainly someone with a lot of insider information anyway, which raises quite a lot of questions.
Who the heck looks young on Tatooine???!! I'd have pegged Reva's age at somewhere around 25-30. However, it's Star Wars and black don't crack. I think we're allowed to be a little flexible. Also, Jedi Younglings can be as old as 13 years of age, which means Reva would be in her early 20s in the series, or the same age as Anakin in ROTS. Which sounds about right to me. She's a bit unbalanced like Anakin and even removes that poor lady's hand(s) with her lightsaber in the square on Tatooine, just like Anakin removes Dooku's hands with his saber at the beginning of ROTS. Star Wars loves its rhyming. And she might be working directly for Vader (secretly) or trying to curry his favour with her aggressive pursuit of Obi-Wan. If you consult Seeker of the Whills screencap from a little earlier in the thread, notice there is a dark-skinned Youngling in the middle in the opening shot (i.e., a classic technique for discreetly spotlighting someone of importance). It's a little hard to tell the sex/gender, but Reva does have a somewhat androgynous appearance anyway: You yourself even posted some press-tour images before, and while it may be apropos of nothing, Moses Ingram is stood in the middle of Ewan and Hayden, too: Reply #263: Reply #320: Tellingly, we don't see what happens to those particular Younglings after their Jedi teacher is gunned down by the invading clones, do we? You can imagine her being mentored by bad people after the Jedi Purge. People who are able to convince her that the Jedi path is a weak and inferior way to use the Force and keep the galaxy from falling into chaos. If the Jedi couldn't save themselves from destruction, what good are they? A further clue rests in the line: "Jedi hunt themselves."
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on May 31, 2022 0:12:21 GMT
A lot of people are theorising that Reva is in the Order 66 scene.
Let's do some basic math: Youngling age = 10 years at the very most Time between Episode III and Obi-Wan series = 10 years 10 + 10 = 20 years old Reva does not look 20 years on Tatoinne. More like 30 years. Even if we try to be very generous at 25, that means she would be 15 as a youngling. Teenage youngling anyone?! Conclusion: Reva cannot be in the Order 66 scene at the beginning of Part I. She's much closer to the age of Anakin/Vader, who would be around 33 by this series.
If I were to bet, she's some 15-20 year old padowan in the Jedi Temple, who may well have been present during its storming. She's certainly someone with a lot of insider information anyway, which raises quite a lot of questions.
Her Actress is 27/28
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 31, 2022 0:13:22 GMT
13 year old youngling?! No way, those are pre-puberty children. Reva looks much more mature than Anakin did in ROTS. I'm in my 20s, I can tell the difference between a late 20s and an early 20s pretty decently (although not 100% of the time)
If she is 30 playing 20, then I guess she joins good company with Luke Skywalker.
I don't mean to say 30 is old either. Some people look excellent at that age, and some of us age faster than others.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 31, 2022 0:22:51 GMT
A lot of people are theorising that Reva is in the Order 66 scene.
Let's do some basic math: Youngling age = 10 years at the very most Time between Episode III and Obi-Wan series = 10 years 10 + 10 = 20 years old Reva does not look 20 years on Tatoinne. More like 30 years. Even if we try to be very generous at 25, that means she would be 15 as a youngling. Teenage youngling anyone?! Conclusion: Reva cannot be in the Order 66 scene at the beginning of Part I. She's much closer to the age of Anakin/Vader, who would be around 33 by this series. If I were to bet, she's some 15-20 year old padowan in the Jedi Temple, who may well have been present during its storming. She's certainly someone with a lot of insider information anyway, which raises quite a lot of questions.
Her Actress is 29 Her exact date of birth isn't available. Weirdly, there's even confusion about the year. From Wikipedia: 1993/1994 (age 27–28)
She would have been in her late twenties when filming the series. It's quite conceivable she is a playing a character in her early twenties. Not that much of an age difference. Mark Hamill was 24 when principal photography began on Episode IV. Luke is meant to be 19. Alec Guinness turned 64 [correction: 62] not long after principal photography began (they had a birthday party for him in Tunisia), but he looked older than Ewan will likely look at the same age. Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen are very close in age, but Padme is meant to be five years Anakin's senior in the prequels. There's ample precedent that Moses Ingram isn't playing a character who perfectly matches her real age. If she is 30 playing 20, then I guess she joins good company with Luke Skywalker. Well, yeah. Look how impatient she is on Tatooine. Now try to imagine her as a vengeful, agitated version of Anakin in Episode II, who displays similar traits, especially when he goes on the hunt for his mother and her captors.
|
|