|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 29, 2022 17:59:15 GMT
Jesus Christ, there are actually people (read: fanboys) who think Obi-Wan was referring to Satine in the conversation with little Leia in Part II. I mean, for heavens sake, Padmé exists. She was one of the main characters in the PT, not a minor character in a spin-off cartoon to the prequels.
I'll gladly defend TCW wherever I can, I'm a true fan of it, but Obi-Wan is definitely not referring to a long gone, very brief romance he had before Episode I (ie 30 odd years ago). He's referring to his bloody friend, the wife of his best friend, the deceased mother of the child beside him. How more obvious can it get? Why is it people think every reference has to be a 4-dimensional riddle like in The Matrix? This is Star Wars, it never seeks to be unnecessarily complicated. Does the director have to spell it out to you? If you believe Satine is more important in Star Wars than Padmé, then you need to get your head examined.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to return to Reddit to remind everyone who Padmé was...
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 29, 2022 18:42:32 GMT
To the punks who ridiculed the Anakin and Padmé age gap in the prequels: 1) Have you noticed the age of Leia in this Obi-Wan series? 2) Have you also seen the movie Solo, which stars her future husband? He is clearly an adult.
3) Do you realise that these two dramas are roughly set in the same time period, half way between Episodes III and IV?
4) Go f*** yourself.
|
|
|
Post by jppiper on May 29, 2022 20:29:16 GMT
ArchdukeOfNaboo HE TALKED TO LEIA ABOUT HER MOTHER WHO IS PADME ARE FANS THIS DENSE?!
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 29, 2022 21:21:26 GMT
ArchdukeOfNaboo HE TALKED TO LEIA ABOUT HER MOTHER WHO IS PADME ARE FANS THIS DENSE?!
No female character in Star Wars history has suffered the level of abuse that Padmé has. It's been non-stop for 17 years, or "relentless" as Darth Sidious would say. The amount of fanboys who don't immediately grasp what Obi-Wan is talking about couldn't better encapsulate the problem we have. There is a ungratefulness, there is a forgetfulness, there is an deliberate ignorance towards her.
Ewan's Obi-Wan has long been re-embraced, we're seeing the same with Hayden and Anakin the past few years. But there has never been that for Natalie's Padmé, only imbecilic comments about her appearance. Absolutely no love whatsoever, beyond a niche groups like us or her female fans on Tumblr and Stan Twitter.
It's really disheartening. You would think people could put 2 + 2 together, and understand that Padmé actually had a daughter, but unfortunately people can't see that, they compartmentalise the two. It is extremely sad when any mother is deprived of the opportunity to raise her children, I wish there was some understanding, some empathy for this tragic character.
I thought it was quite interesting, nonetheless, of how the theme of adoption was raised in the first episode. It's fertile territory, something Star Wars has never really delved into, despite it always being their in the background for such a long time (before I was even born, in fact). It offers a great opportunity to explore Leia's relationship to the parents she never had, and thus tying her to our beloved prequels. Bail and Padmé of course were fierce close friends, nobody still alive and not in a mechanical suit knew her better.
Obi-Wan and Bail became mutual friends through Padmé.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on May 29, 2022 21:26:55 GMT
To the punks who ridiculed the Anakin and Padmé age gap in the prequels: 1) Have you noticed the age of Leia in this Obi-Wan series? 2) Have you also seen the movie Solo, which stars her future husband? He is clearly an adult.
3) Do you realise that these two dramas are roughly set in the same time period, half way between Episodes III and IV?
4) Go f*** yourself.
Even Marcia Lucas was guilty of this sadly.
In TPM, it would be a massive stretch to find clues that Padme has those feelings for young Anakin already.
|
|
|
Post by emperorferus on May 29, 2022 21:46:42 GMT
I was cautiously optimistic going in, largely because Disney Lucasfilm finally seems to be giving the PT the treatment that it did the OT (not that it ultimately respected the OT with the ST, but it paid homage nonetheless with Rogue One and more).
I have nothing new to say about Ewan, this felt like no time had passed since 2005- it could very well have been Episode IV after ROTS for the familiarity he seemed to have with the character.
I was disappointed that we didn't hear Qui-Gon but there will be plenty of time for that- Liam is definitely not opposed to coming back and is reprising his role for Tales of the Jedi, so I'd be surprised if he didn't make any appearance at all. Young Leia was a surprise, but I don't think she was misused. I found her to be slightly annoying during their walk through the city, but her interactions with Obi-Wan after he saved her made up for it. It was interesting to see the social dynamics on Alderaan between the Organas and her cousins. I always pictured Bail to be a relatively laid-back parent.
As for the Inquisitors, I'm sure that either the Grand Inquisitor isn't dead, or he isn't the Rebels character (which might explain why Jason Isaacs isn't back). Either way, I'm not too concerned with how that plot element will be resolved. Reva makes for a compelling antagonist- she is cruel in her own right, and the narrative has no delusions about that, but she is also trying to prove herself among other villains.
One criticism I have is that I found it silly that the Grand Inquisitor literally saved Obi-Wan without realizing it twice. He was a deus ex machina both on Tatooine and during Obi-Wan and Leia's escape.
I was not expecting to see Vader so soon, and it absolutely succeeded in keeping me hooked for more. While I would have chosen a non-Imperial faction as the villains, I am pleased with the Empire/s role so far. I think it might be a stretch to have Obi-Wan actually meet Vader before ANH, but I think it could be told as a compelling story nonetheless. I am interested in seeing what happens, even if it is a slight breach.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 29, 2022 22:51:13 GMT
How more obvious can it get? Why is it people think every reference has to be a 4-dimensional riddle like in The Matrix? This is Star Wars, it never seeks to be unnecessarily complicated. It doesn't seek to be unnecessarily complicated, nor does it do "riddles", per se, and there is beauty in simplicity. Star Wars definitely excels in that regard. I also think fans are being a bit dense here, if what you say is true (I haven't sought out fan reactions very much yet, besides reading and responding to fellow Naberrie Fielders). However, sometimes, people clearly underthink the franchise. Many examples come to mind, like the dogmatic refusal to believe Leia has recollections of Padme through the Force in ROTJ, the obstinacy surrounding major prequel elements like Qui-Gon, Jar Jar, and midi-chlorians, the tedious whining that Anakin turns to the Dark Side because of "a bad dream", or making out that Anakin displays zero traits that Padme would find attractive. To the punks who ridiculed the Anakin and Padmé age gap in the prequels: 1) Have you noticed the age of Leia in this Obi-Wan series? 2) Have you also seen the movie Solo, which stars her future husband? He is clearly an adult.
3) Do you realise that these two dramas are roughly set in the same time period, half way between Episodes III and IV? 4) Go f*** yourself. Some fans are definitely in deep denial here. I tried raising that issue a few years ago on TFN (when I briefly returned under a new account), and I did this in the Sequel Trilogy forum, where raging fanatics obsessed with race and gender congregate (e.g., try saying that Rey friendzones Finn in TFA and see what happens). I pointed out that Han is practically a sugar daddy to Leia. They instantly tried dismissing my wider point on a technicality ("Leia is already rich"). Yet they're the sort that would likely have a bone to pick with the prequels over Anakin's "stalker" behaviour, Padme's tragic death (which is apparently "sexist" and belongs to "19th Century romance fiction"), or the PT's alleged infusion of "racial stereotyping". I said how the real-life situation was no better: Carrie Fisher was still a teenager in ANH, while Harrison Ford was a married man in his thirties with children, who cheated on his wife with Carrie. But forget it. They don't want to know. Anyway, this sort of negativity is something I think goes against the grain of discussion here. So far, it's nice to see a basic sense of unity and interest in Star Wars again, thanks to the new series.
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on May 29, 2022 23:10:21 GMT
Yeah, I saw them saying that too Archduke, about Satine. I'm reading these comments like, "You stupid, stupid, stupids."
I don't know how I wasted so much time there. Though, it might be even worse now than it was before.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 29, 2022 23:13:03 GMT
Okay, to pick up on another point here: It's really disheartening. You would think people could put 2 + 2 together, and understand that Padmé actually had a daughter, but unfortunately people can't see that, they compartmentalise the two. It is extremely sad when any mother is deprived of the opportunity to raise her children, I wish there was some understanding, some empathy for this tragic character. Yeah, the generational, parents-and-kids aspect of Star Wars is so central to the storytelling, it's been really cool to see the Obi-Wan series tapping into it. I honestly didn't think Leia would be in it much. A spoiler I shared in March ( Reply #200) mentioned "scenes of Leia's life on Alderaan", implying we'd be seeing Leia in the show but perhaps in a limited capacity; allowing her scenes to be cut if necessary. I'm glad that spoiler was, as it turned out, barely half the story! I think there's something else going on here with the mentality you describe. I think it goes back to the OT and how Leia is more of a supporting character. She's a strong character, certainly. But the focus is really all on Vader and Luke. Even in the ST, Leia never quite comes forward in the narrative with an arc or a presence to match Luke's in TLJ. She has always been somewhat neglected or sidelined to make way for Skywalker males. Thus, when you add in Padme's tragic death, there's a sense that the female side of the equation just doesn't matter as much beyond the PT. Maybe this development in the Obi-Wan show comes from the series having a female director and various other women with influential positions within Lucasfilm. If so, great. But whoever is responsible, we're seeing some balance brought to the Force. Leia is deserving of being shown as a young girl and having a bond with Obi-Wan. Why should all the spoils here go to Luke? I hope, wherever Carrie is, she's smiling at the young Leia right now. That's right. This series seems to really understand the prequels and the importance of Padme through these surrogate, adoptive fathers: people that knew Padme and came to know each other through Padme (excellent point there, AD). My one criticism, which I made earlier, is that it would be nice to see more of Breha. Leia has an adoptive mother, too, and Star Wars could do well to focus a bit more on mother-child relationships. Plus, like Owen and Beru, Bail and Breha seem to have a happy marriage, and there is scope for showing them as a couple. It would certainly make Alderaan's destruction in ANH all the more shocking and senseless.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 29, 2022 23:55:53 GMT
Yeah, I saw them saying that too Archduke, about Satine. I'm reading these comments like, "You stupid, stupid, stupids." Hahaha, well put.
And it's a shame really, because I have to waste all my energy on a point that should be instantly understandable to the fanbase - I have to pour out sweat spelling out the obvious. What I'd prefer to spend my time on is talking about how much I enjoyed that little bit of writing, it was my favourite moment in the 2nd episode.
I've lost interest in debating how good or bad the show is, all that seems to concern me now is educating the fanboys. Defending the legacy of the PT is my highest priority.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 0:12:38 GMT
I was cautiously optimistic going in, largely because Disney Lucasfilm finally seems to be giving the PT the treatment that it did the OT (not that it ultimately respected the OT with the ST, but it paid homage nonetheless with Rogue One and more). Yeah, this series represents the first time a live-action project from Disney/Lucasfim isn't treating the prequels like a scab that should be removed, but is according them due in-universe historical relevance. And it also isn't shy of the meta touches, like the prequel recap at the beginning and Obi-Wan's nightmare montage. Well, he looks a bit older, his eyes heavier, his face more worn, but yeah, he's right back into character, with all the gentility, concern, quiet disdain, fateful resignation, and do-gooder traits he showed in the PT. Same Obi-Wan, just with a heavy heart. I'm wondering about that, too. I expect he'll show up at some point, but I'm not making stringent demands about it. They have already set the scene, though, so to speak, by having Obi-Wan call on him in both of the first two episodes. I bet, on Daiyu, Obi-Wan regretted calling Anakin (and indirectly Jar Jar) "[another] pathetic lifeform". Anakin and Jar Jar gave Obi-Wan little trouble compared to Leia's rude and defiant ways, right when their lives are at stake and they're being hunted! I think some annoyingness was the point there. We see that Obi-Wan is more mature now, but even an ex-Jedi Master has difficulty controlling a feisty girl. Regarding Bail: Me, too. Perfect writing and acting. Proof that Lucas got the casting exactly right in both his trilogies. Even with all his wealth and privilege and myriad responsibilities, Bail is a wonderfully relaxed, caring, compassionate man. An ideal believer of democracy and supporter of the Jedi, and the kind of patient, encouraging father that Anakin almost had in Qui-Gon. I've always felt that Qui-Gon and Bail are very alike. Yeah, Star Wars always frames nasty villains as just that: nasty. They can still be relatable or sympathetic, but there's never much mincing around about their evil ways. From her first scene, Reva leaves a strong impression. He did? Huh. I guess he's not the bald, black-suited, pasty-skinned, Force-powered, British-accented foe Obi-Wan should be worried about. Maybe the subtext here is that doing things by-the-book tends to produce mediocre results. Obi-Wan was very by-the-book in TPM and, as Qui-Gon said, he still had "much to learn of the Living Force". I think the basic idea behind bringing in the Empire and Vader and the Inquisitors is to give this thing maximum stakes. They could have done a much more low-key take on Obi-Wan's life in the desert and it would have worked well. But it wouldn't have drawn the same level of attention or interest. It's actually a bit audacious because it raises expectations and it could all come crashing down. I really hope not. At least there's not the same level of viewer tension that there would be with an ongoing series. The whole series is already one and done. They can't screw it up or overreach later down the line nor try and retcon their earlier decisions. It's a tight, complete thing, with a beginning, a middle, and an end. I don't know about other fans, but I'm quite relieved about that. If I have any sadness, then I wish we could maybe have had 8-10 episodes. Never mind. Six is probably enough if they've done it right.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 0:15:58 GMT
Even in the ST, Leia never quite comes forward in the narrative with an arc or a presence to match Luke's in TLJ. She has always been somewhat neglected or sidelined to make way for Skywalker males.
Oh, I don't know. Did you not get strong vibes from TROS of "Let's make Leia do everything, let's retrospectively make her the master of everything" now? I can understand the motivation given the untimely passing of Carrie Fisher, but it felt like overcompensation for me, a bit too try-hard. I did not like how they handled the character by doctoring footage either, felt rather artificial like the CGI Leia in Rogue One did.
What Abrams should have done from day 1 on TFA was show us the New Republic (or 2nd Galactic Republic, as I would call it) in action, and show us Leia in action there. Instead, we get a rehash of the original film, and all the spaceship mumbo jumbo, because the environment at Lucasfilm through 2012-2015 was so toxically anti-prequels and dismissive of Lucas.
I hope this series can continue to show Leia to be her own thing. Aping all that we love about Padmé - the most ridiculed female character in the mythology - and attaching it to an already loved character from the OT is surely not the way to go.
Padmé is the real senator of Star Wars, the true political titan. Show, don't tell, and my did GL do it in style in the PT.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 0:41:58 GMT
Even in the ST, Leia never quite comes forward in the narrative with an arc or a presence to match Luke's in TLJ. She has always been somewhat neglected or sidelined to make way for Skywalker males. Oh, I don't know. Did you not get strong vibes from TROS of "Let's make Leia do everything, let's retrospectively make her the master of everything" now? I can understand the motivation given the untimely passing of Carrie Fisher, but it felt like overcompensation for me, a bit too try-hard. I did not like how they handled the character by doctoring footage either, felt rather artificial like the CGI Leia in Rogue One did. Well, yeah -- they tried to give her an arc. And it's an arc that works reasonably well, but wants for a certain depth and comes off as weirdly truncated. It didn't help matters that Carrie died before the ST had been seen to completion. The doctored footage can come off as a bit awkward. Abrams said they would never recast the part and I can understand his tremendous reluctance. But maybe they could have. I don't know. I prefer what they did to CG Leia and CG Tarkin in "Rogue One". Too much Uncanny Valley for me there. Leia was meant to emerge as a tremendous force in her own right in the Sequel Trilogy. Lucas himself planned it that way. Of course, the end result from Disney/LFL can be debated, but I was honestly trying to avoid raising too much of an ST debate. You nailed it there. TFA will always be a mega disappointment compared to what they could -- and should -- have done. Even looking aside this decision or that decision, the scale and scope of the film are so wrong, so tiny, so narrow. I definitely didn't want Foxhole Star Wars after the mighty expansiveness of the PT. They went in totally the opposite direction and it had a paralysing effect on the entire Sequel Trilogy.
Yep. But will Leia be in it much more? I'd like to think so, but I'm really not sure. I think it's fairly obvious that the first two episodes constitute the first act of a three-act story. That act comes to an end after Obi-Wan rescues Leia and leaves Daiyu with her, narrowly fleeing Reva but learning that Anakin still lives. He could deposit Leia right back on Alderaan at the start of the next episode and we might not see her again. That would be a shame. However, I am really trying to suspend judgement and just enjoy whatever the series throws at us. Then we can discuss the whole thing in more detail and form our opinions.
That is a wonderful valentine to the PT, Arch Duke. Yes, indeed.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 1:46:54 GMT
Anakin and Leia. Father and daughter... in a better universe
|
|
|
Post by stampidhd280pro on May 30, 2022 2:26:22 GMT
Yeah, I saw them saying that too Archduke, about Satine. I'm reading these comments like, "You stupid, stupid, stupids." Hahaha, well put.
And it's a shame really, because I have to waste all my energy on a point that should be instantly understandable to the fanbase - I have to pour out sweat spelling out the obvious. What I'd prefer to spend my time on is talking about how much I enjoyed that little bit of writing, it was my favourite moment in the 2nd episode.
I've lost interest in debating how good or bad the show is, all that seems to concern me now is educating the fanboys. Defending the legacy of the PT is my highest priority.
what I loved is that Leia's little moment there immediately reminded me of Padme, and then Obi-Wan immediately said what we were all thinking.
|
|
|
Post by eljedicolombiano on May 30, 2022 2:53:06 GMT
So I finished the first episode...
Good but not great- I think if there is one thing that I find lacking from these Disney plus live action shows is the pace. Star Wars was always characterized by a fast paced, yet direct and clear storytelling. Shame this didn't see the light as a film, as it was originally intended.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 2:56:07 GMT
Notes on Episode II the second episodeIt wasn't bad either. The Leia actress has a little bit of Anakin in her, doesn't she? Very good casting like Jake Llyod, I must say. As I said on my comments on the first episode, it's good to see child actors returning to Star Wars, it makes thing feel that much more Phantom Menacey. A youthful vibrancy is with us once more. Obi-Wan tells little Leia to pretend to be his daughter, then she responds by saying she'd be more like a granddaughter. McGregor is old enough to be a grandfather, sure, but this must also be an in-joke about the speculation during the ST, right? Some fans thought, even demanded, Rey be Kenobi's granddaughter, as preposterous an idea it was (I would not have mind niece or grandniece etc). Interestingly, Kathleen Kennedy spoke about the subject in the week before the premiere, debunking it as going against Lucas' wishes for the character and the vows of the Jedi Order, and that can't be a coincidence? For once, Kennedy was speaking some sense. There's also a reference to the Hong Kong-inspired city of Daiyu as being in a lockdown. A little Easter Egg for people watching in the future. Anyone find any on-screen characters with in-universe mask wearing? Besides Vader!
I thought the chase sequence between Leia and Obi-Wan was executed terrifically, reminding us all of its Episode II namesake. I liked seeing the different alien species here, there was a bit of Lucasian goofyness to be sure. And it was very touching when Obi-Wan used the Force to save Leia's life from a catastrophic fall. While I can see why some people might say meh to this episode (the people who never enjoyed Home Alone), there's no denying that the director handled that part effectively The chemistry between McGregor and the actress playing little Leia was very powerful. Forget the Inquisitor show, we have the Leia show, and I can't say I'm complaining. I love the Obi-Wan - little Leia dynamic. And why wouldn't I? I love all the Home Alones, I loved young Anakin in Episode I. I was dreading that Reva would get more screentime than Obi-Wan. And my highlight? It has to be Obi-Wan reminiscing to Leia about her real mother - that definitely got me. I suppose he can't exactly tell her the full truth, can he? She only finds out she shares the same mother with Luke in ROTJ, right? I guess we have had the dialogue reference to Padmé, and the visual callback in the first episode, but her name still hasn't been said aloud, correct? We've had "Anakin" name-checked in both episodes, by multiple characters. We need Padmé invoked to clear up the unnecessary fanboy confusion. Now I'm not fully convinced its dawned on Obi-Wan that Anakin survived at the end of this episode, because if that's it then, well, it is a lot more clumsy than I would have preferred it to be. Why did the Grand Inquisitor have to die at the exact same time? It draws attention away. The Inquisitor woman seems to shout out Vader and then Anakin haphazardly, like throwing names out there, and it doesn't make sense that she would know his true identity. I was hoping the revelation would come to Obi-Wan in a face-to-face with his former apprentice, whereby Vader would mention it and/or Obi-Wan would sense it in the force (as Luke soon did after Vader told him in TESB). Hopefully we see the true realisation is all its glory in the third episode. We sure will learn all the juicy details about Reva's past, anyway. Did you notice the visual reference of Trinity in the rooftop chase in The Matrix? McGregor's accent appears more familiar in this episode. I really don't want him steering off into a pale imitation, he just has to be who he is, even the bashers loved him in the prequels, for crying out loud. The shot of unsuited Vader in the bacta tank, or Anakin with all his Mustafar burns, really got me excited for the next one. Do you think they put too much prosthetics on Christensen's face, or is it reasonable? It's not as elegant as the shots we got in Rogue One, though that wasn't a close-up, to be fair. A tad too cauliflower for my tastes, but we'll see how it goes out, we've only had a few seconds. I'm really anxious to see the 3rd episode. I think that sums up my feelings on the programme more than anything
Oh, and sidenote, we now have now a positive twist to Alderaan being blown up in ANH: the asshole cousin dies
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 3:19:41 GMT
So I finished the first episode... Good but not great- I think if there is one thing that I find lacking from these Disney plus live action shows is the pace. Star Wars was always characterized by a fast paced, yet direct and clear storytelling. Shame this didn't see the light as a film, as it was originally intended. Well, that was basically my impression after one watch, as well (I haven't yet sat down and watched it again). But talking about it in here, milling over the details, has already caused the series to go up a little in my estimation and made me eager to watch the first two episodes again. I can understand what you mean about the pacing. Although, it's a miniseries, so it's bound to feel a little different to the hyper-dense, rhythmic storytelling of the films. Maybe the first episode struggled to gain momentum on Tatooine, but I didn't mind that. The Alderaan scenes with Leia were much more lively; and, I guess, have a concision that the Tatooine segments lack. It's like two different vehicles awkwardly welded together. But I think it might feel a bit more natural on repeat viewings. There are boons to it being done as a miniseries. Cinema is great, but shortform. TV allows a bit more exploration. That said, if the whole series is some shitty length, if all the episodes total a mere three hours or something, I'll be a little annoyed. I want four, at least. You know: two feature films run-time equivalent. It kinda defeats the purpose if it's any shorter. I also think it's a bit sad to lose the audience reaction you get in a movie theater. There are some funny moments with Leia that would surely have raised some laughter if shown theatrically. Instead, we have to imagine the reaction, and so the miniseries immediately feels slightly flat by comparison. Still, I think the quality is holding up so far.
|
|
|
Post by ArchdukeOfNaboo on May 30, 2022 3:29:07 GMT
Episode II and Part II :
Come on, live a little, guys. This was cute.
|
|
|
Post by Cryogenic on May 30, 2022 4:11:58 GMT
Episode II and Part II : Come on, live a little, guys. This was cute. Heh. I thought that felt familiar. Kenobi keeps in shape with these pesky Skywalkers keeping him busy!
|
|